Automated summary
Runs a structured debrief in four passes — what was expected, what actually happened, why the gap, and what to do next — to extract lessons from a past event.
Strengths
- Fill-in-the-blank scaffold with tables (timeline, expected-vs-actual gaps, root causes, actions) that removes the blank-page problem
- Explicitly separates raw facts from analysis, which curbs jumping to explanations and finger-pointing
- Forces an owner and a deadline on every improvement, plus a follow-up date to check whether changes stuck
- Asks for what worked and how to protect it, not just a list of failures
Limitations
- Provides only the structure — output quality depends entirely on participants' honesty and recall
- The 'no blame' guideline is stated but the skill offers no method for handling tension or disagreement during the session
- Assumes a finished, reasonably documented event; without concrete facts the tables stay vague
Use it right after a launch, project, presentation, or any significant event where the team needs concrete lessons and assigned follow-up actions.
Avoid it for resolving interpersonal conflict, reviewing an individual's performance, or running a technical incident post-mortem that needs deeper causal analysis.
Security analysis
SafeThis skill is a pure Markdown prompt/template with no declared allowed-tools, no shell commands, no network or file access, and no instructions to exfiltrate data, disable safeguards, or run obfuscated payloads. It only asks the model to guide a structured after-action review conversation, so listing it carries no meaningful execution risk.
No concerns found
How this analysis is madeExamples
Run an after-action review of our homepage redesign launch on March 12. Here's what we planned: ship by 9am, 5% conversion lift, no more than 1 hour downtime. Here's what happened: we shipped at 2pm, conversion dropped 2% for three days, and we didn't post in Slack until hour 3.Do a structured AAR on yesterday's presentation to the executive committee — three of us presented, we had 20 minutes, and the Q&A ran long. Ask me for the details you need.AAR on last weekend's database server migration: planned 2-hour window, actual 6 hours, one rollback attempt. Walk me through the four questions.name: aar description: After-Action Review—structured debrief asking what was expected, what happened, why the difference, and what next. Use after projects, launches, presentations, or any significant event. user-invocable: true
After-Action Review
Conduct a structured debrief to extract learning from any significant event or experience.
Instructions
Work through the four core questions honestly and specifically. Focus on events and systems, not blaming individuals.
Output Format
Event: What are we reviewing? Date: When did it happen? Participants: Who was involved?
1. What Was Expected?
Before the event, what did we think would happen?
Goals/Objectives
- [What were we trying to achieve?]
Plan
- [What was the plan to achieve it?]
Success Criteria
- [How would we know if we succeeded?]
Assumptions
- [What did we assume would be true?]
2. What Actually Happened?
Facts only—what occurred, not why
Timeline | Time | Event | |------|-------| | [When] | [What happened] |
Outcomes
- [What results did we get?]
Compared to Expected | Expected | Actual | Gap | |----------|--------|-----| | [expectation] | [reality] | [+/-] |
3. Why the Difference?
Analysis of the gap between expected and actual
What Went Well (sustain these) | Success | Contributing Factors | |---------|---------------------| | [what worked] | [why it worked] |
What Didn't Go Well (improve these) | Problem | Root Cause | |---------|-----------| | [what failed] | [why it failed] |
Surprises
- [Things we didn't anticipate]
4. What Do We Do Next?
Specific actions to sustain or improve
Sustain (keep doing these) | Action | Owner | How to Protect It | |--------|-------|-------------------| | [what to continue] | [who] | [mechanism] |
Improve (change these) | Action | Owner | By When | |--------|-------|---------| | [what to change] | [who] | [deadline] |
Key Takeaways Top 3 lessons from this review:
- [Lesson]
- [Lesson]
- [Lesson]
Follow-up When will we check if improvements are working?
Guidelines
- Do this soon—memory fades fast
- Be specific: "Communication failed" → "We didn't update Slack until hour 3"
- Balance: Include what went well, not just problems
- Assign owners: Insights without ownership become forgotten
- Make it safe: Blame shuts down honesty
$ARGUMENTS
From the file to a first result
The download contains exactly the content displayed on this page. This copy may differ from the latest version in the source repository.
View the source and supporting filesThis download contains SKILL.md only. Any scripts, references, templates and dependencies are not included. Get the required files from the source, preserving their directory structure, before continuing.
1. Download the file
Download SKILL.mdFrom the root of a test project, save the file as .skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md, or use the command below. This folder is for inspecting the skill before installation.
Command for macOS/Linux or WSL: requires a POSIX shell and curl. On Windows without WSL, use the download button and create the folder manually.
mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/download' --output '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md'2. Check prerequisites
Read SKILL.md before using it. If it references scripts or external services, inspect them and prepare the required access in your test environment.
No recognized prerequisites section in this file. This does not mean it is self-contained: libraries, tools and access requirements may be mentioned elsewhere in the content or source repository.
The platforms on this page are catalog indications. The paths below follow tool documentation; they do not prove this skill has been run in those tools. No minimum tool version is confirmed for this listing.
3. Load the skill
After inspection, copy the complete folder into your project using one of the commands below, then open a new tool session. The command stops if a folder with the same name already exists: compare the files before replacing it.
Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/aar' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1' '.claude/skills/aar'Cursor
test -f '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.cursor/skills' && test ! -e '.cursor/skills/aar' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1' '.cursor/skills/aar'Codex
test -f '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.agents/skills' && test ! -e '.agents/skills/aar' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1' '.agents/skills/aar'OpenSkills
OpenSkills must already be installed. The local install/read procedure is checked with OpenSkills 1.5.0, which requires Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Catalog slugs are not resolved automatically.
Official OpenSkills installationopenskills install './.skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1'openskills read 'after-action-review-mrwakbs1'Reading should display the installed file content and its base directory. It does not run the skill or install its dependencies.
For an agent that reads AGENTS.md, then sync the index. This command changes AGENTS.md: review the diff before using it.
openskills syncManual method or another tool: attach SKILL.md to a conversation, or open it in an agent that can read files. Include any required supporting resources. No universal folder is recognized by every tool.
4. Try a first task
Use a short, synthetic input: an API endpoint, a small document or an interface brief. In a new conversation, attach the file or give the agent its path, then adapt this request:
Read .skill-downloads/after-action-review-mrwakbs1/SKILL.md and apply its instructions to this example: [describe a test input]. Identify any missing files, dependencies or access. Produce the result requested by the skill without inventing data or running unreviewed scripts.Expected result: output matching the skill instructions, or a precise list of missing prerequisites. A read confirmation alone does not validate a first use. If an external resource is unavailable, that path remains untested.
PDF Reader
Productivity
Read and extract text from PDF files, including documents, reports, contracts, and spreadsheets. Works with local files, URLs, and WhatsApp attachments. Use whenever PDF content is needed, even if not explicitly requested.
Discord Messaging Workflows
Productivity
Use the message tool to send, edit, and moderate Discord messages with interactive components.
Interactive Verdict Preview
Productivity
Generate an interactive HTML preview of keep/drop verdicts for maintainer review, then process the pasted feedback JSON.