Our review
Provides a structured workflow for agent teams to work autonomously in parallel on a single feature branch, with a team lead orchestrating planning, spawning teammates, and reviewing integration.
Strengths
- Clear separation of file ownership to avoid conflicts
- Automated failure recovery with retry and logging
- Integration of sub-agents for testing, code review, and e2e validation
- Standardized git branch strategy for parallel development
Limitations
- Requires careful task breakdown to ensure no overlapping file ownership
- Relies on manual plan approval before execution
- Sub-agents may introduce overhead if not properly configured
Use this workflow when you have a large, multi-file feature that can be broken into independent tasks and multiple agents are available.
Avoid this workflow for small, single-file changes or when you need tight coordination on overlapping files.
Security analysis
SafeThe skill provides operational guidance for AI agent teams, with no executable commands, no destructive instructions, and no data exfiltration risks.
No concerns found
Examples
/workflow-team lead/workflow-team teammateCreate an agent team with 2 teammates: 1. "FeatureA" — Read feature-a-plan.md. Own files: src/featureA/**/*. 2. "FeatureB" — Read feature-b-plan.md. Own files: src/featureB/**/*. Use Opus for all teammates. Require plan approval.name: workflow-team description: | Workflow for Agent Teams autonomous parallel development. Provides team lead orchestration guide and teammate execution protocol. Covers file ownership, communication, and merge strategy. argument-hint: "[lead|teammate]"
Agent Teams Workflow
Autonomous parallel development workflow for Agent Teams.
Invoke with: /workflow-team lead or /workflow-team teammate
For Team Lead (/workflow-team lead)
Phase 1: Plan
| Step | Action |
|------|--------|
| 1 | Enter PlanMode |
| 2 | Read CLAUDE.md, docs/PROJECT-STRUCTURE.md, docs/ROADMAP.md |
| 3 | Analyze task scope, identify required files and dependencies |
| 4 | Break work into tasks with clear file ownership (no overlapping files) |
| 5 | Create detailed step-by-step plan with task breakdown |
| 6 | Exit PlanMode → wait for plan approval |
After plan approval, create tasks via
TaskCreateand spawn teammates immediately. No separate confirmation needed.
Phase 2: Execute (after user approval)
| Step | Action |
|------|--------|
| 1 | Switch to development branch, create a working branch for the team |
| 2 | Spawn teammates with detailed prompts (see Spawn Example below) |
| 3 | Use Delegate Mode (Shift+Tab) — do NOT implement yourself |
| 4 | Monitor teammate progress, unblock as needed |
Enable Plan Approval for complex/risky tasks. All teammates work on the same feature branch (file ownership prevents conflicts).
Spawn Example
Create an agent team with N teammates:
1. "{name}" — Read {task-file-path}. Own files: {file-list}.
2. "{name}" — Read {task-file-path}. Own files: {file-list}.
Use Opus for all teammates. Require plan approval.
Phase 3: Review & Merge (after all teammates complete)
| Step | Action |
|------|--------|
| 1 | Run the project's test command (see CLAUDE.md Commands) to verify integration |
| 2 | Run code-reviewer sub-agent on all changed files |
| 3 | Run e2e-tester sub-agent to validate user flows |
| 4 | Read report in /docs/reports/code-review/ → fix ALL issues where status ≠ "complete" |
| 5 | Merge working branch → development |
| 6 | Update ROADMAP.md and PROJECT-STRUCTURE.md |
Merge Strategy
main
└── development
└── {working-branch} ← single branch, all teammates work here
├── teammate-A commits (owns: file-list-A)
├── teammate-B commits (owns: file-list-B)
└── teammate-C commits (owns: file-list-C)
After all teammates done → Phase 3
Git Conventions
For Teammates (/workflow-team teammate)
Execution Steps
| Step | Action |
|------|--------|
| 1 | Read CLAUDE.md, docs/PROJECT-STRUCTURE.md, assigned task file |
| 2 | Run unit-test-writer sub-agent (Red Phase). NEVER analyze patterns or write test code yourself — always delegate to the unit-test-writer subagent. |
| 3 | Implement code to pass tests (Green Phase) → run the project's test command (see CLAUDE.md Commands) |
| 4 | Run the project's coverage command (see CLAUDE.md Commands) |
| 5 | Commit per workflow-commits.md |
| 6 | Message lead: files changed, test results, remaining issues |
Teammate Rules
- ONLY modify files assigned to you
- NEVER touch files owned by another teammate
- Shared files (barrel
index.ts,routes.ts): message lead before modifying - New files: create freely within your task scope
- Do NOT create branches — work on the feature branch created by lead
Failure Recovery (Autonomous)
IF any step fails:
1. Log to docs/reports/failures/{teammate-name}-{timestamp}.md
2. Retry SAME approach (1 attempt)
3. Retry DIFFERENT approach (1 attempt)
4. After 3 failures:
→ Message lead: "Blocked on [issue]. Attempted [approaches]."
→ Pick up next available task
→ DO NOT STOP
Communication
| Event | Action | |-------|--------| | Task complete | Message lead with summary | | Blocked by another task | Message lead, pick up next task | | Found issue in shared code | Message lead (don't fix directly) | | Need design decision | Message lead with options + recommendation |
Cost Notes
- Use
opusmodel for teammates - Teammates: NO code-reviewer — TDD cycle is the quality gate, lead handles all review in Phase 3
- Lead runs
code-reviewer+e2e-testeras the single review gate post-merge - Minimize sub-agent calls per teammate
- Avoid broadcast messages — message lead directly
Next.js App Router Expert
Development
A skill that turns Claude into a Next.js App Router expert.
README Generator
Development
Creates professional and comprehensive README.md files for your projects.
API Documentation Writer
Development
Generates comprehensive API documentation in OpenAPI/Swagger format.