Am I a Tiger?

VerifiedCaution

Analyze your real organizational impact by examining git, Slack, and issue tracker contributions to determine if you're a key invisible person. Identify invisible work, prepare for performance reviews, and recognize your true value.

Sby Skills Guide Bot
ProductivityBeginner
3/4/2026
Claude CodeCursorWindsurf
#career-growth#self-assessment#invisible-work#contribution-analysis#performance-review

Recommended for

Automated summary

Walks the user through a self-assessment of their real organizational weight, combining a structured interview with analysis of git, Slack and issue-tracker data to produce a "Tiger Score" and a map of their invisible contributions.

Strengths

  • One-question-at-a-time interview that surfaces invisible work: emergencies, out-of-scope requests, and mental load.
  • Mines concrete signals from GitHub, Slack, Jira or Linear when the matching MCP servers are connected.
  • Delivers reusable artifacts: Tiger Score, Contribution Map, Invisible Work Inventory, and a Visibility Strategy.
  • Pushes back when answers are too vague or too modest.

Limitations

  • Without MCP access to repos, Slack or tickets, the assessment is purely self-reported.
  • The Tiger Score is a homegrown heuristic, not a validated measurement.
  • Its strong self-advocacy framing may not land well in every company culture.
When to use it

Use it before a performance review, or when you suspect your workload is heavier than your recognition.

When not to use it

Not suitable for team-level capacity planning or as a substitute for a compensation conversation with your manager or HR.

Security analysis

Caution
Quality score84/100

The skill is not destructive or exfiltrating: it does not instruct secret transmission, curl|sh, obfuscated payloads, or safety disabling. However, it uses broad GitHub/Slack/Jira/Linear and Bash access to analyze sensitive workplace activity, including DMs and off-hours work, so it warrants caution rather than a clean safe rating.

Findings
  • •Wildcard MCP access to GitHub, Slack, Jira, and Linear could expose sensitive organizational data beyond the user's intended scope.
  • •The skill encourages analysis of Slack mentions, DMs during crises, off-hours activity, and incident participation, which are privacy-sensitive workplace signals.
  • •Bash is declared as an allowed tool even though the instructions do not require shell execution; this expands the execution surface unnecessarily.
  • •No explicit data-minimization, retention, or consent boundaries are described for handling workplace communications and contribution data.
How this analysis is made

Examples

Before my review
I have my performance review next week and I want to know whether I'm actually carrying more than my job title says. Can you look at my GitHub activity and Slack mentions from the last six months and tell me if I'm a tiger?
Invisible work audit
Help me figure out what invisible work I do that never shows up in tickets — start by asking me about the emergencies I've been pulled into over the last few months.
Bus factor check
Walk me through what would break if I left tomorrow, and which of those things only live in my head and aren't documented anywhere.

name: am-i-a-tiger description: | For individual contributors who suspect they're carrying more organizational weight than their job title suggests. Analyzes your actual contribution patterns across git, Slack, and issue trackers to reveal if you're a "tiger" - one of those key people who actually keeps things running when something breaks. Use when you want to understand your real organizational impact, prepare for performance reviews, or figure out if you're being undervalued. Keywords: am I important, my contributions, invisible work, undervalued, tiger team, performance review, impact assessment, what do I actually do, recognition, career growth allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__github__, mcp__slack__, mcp__jira__, mcp__linear__

Am I a Tiger?

You are helping me figure out whether I'm a "tiger" in my organization - one of those key people who actually keeps things running, especially when something goes wrong.

Why This Matters

Every organization has an official structure and an unofficial one. The official structure is job titles and org charts. The unofficial structure is who actually gets called when something is on fire. Tigers are the people in that second structure - they carry invisible load, handle emergencies, and often do work that doesn't show up in formal metrics.

If you're a tiger and don't know it, you might be:

  • Undervalued in performance reviews because your real work isn't visible
  • Burning out from carrying weight others don't see
  • Missing opportunities because leadership doesn't know what you actually do
  • Unable to articulate your impact when it matters

I want to find out:

  • Whether I'm actually a tiger (or just think I am)
  • What specific patterns show my real organizational impact
  • Where my valuable work is falling through the cracks
  • How to make this visible without becoming insufferable about it

What We'll Build

Based on our conversation and available data, I'll help you create:

  • Tiger Score: A quantified assessment of your tiger-ness based on concrete signals
  • Contribution Map: What you actually do vs. what your job description says
  • Invisible Work Inventory: Valuable contributions that don't show in formal systems
  • Visibility Strategy: How to surface this work appropriately

How This Works

  • I'll ask you ONE question at a time
  • Start with what you actually spend time on, then dig into the data
  • Push back if your answers are too vague or too modest
  • Help you see patterns you might be too close to notice
  • If you have access to git, Slack, or issue trackers, I'll analyze actual data

Exploration Areas

Emergency Patterns

  • Think about the last 3-5 real emergencies at work. Were you involved? How did you get pulled in?
  • When something breaks at 10 PM, does your phone ring? Who calls you?
  • Have you ever been added to a war room or incident channel? How often?

The Go-To Factor

  • What do people come to you for that isn't in your job description?
  • When someone new joins, do people say "talk to [you] about X"? What's X?
  • Are there questions that get routed to you even though someone else "owns" that area?

Off-Hours Signals

  • Do you find yourself working weekends or evenings on things that "just need to get done"?
  • Have you ever shipped something because you knew it wouldn't happen otherwise?
  • Do you carry mental load about systems or processes others don't think about?

Review & Mention Patterns

  • Who asks you to review their PRs or documents? Is it always the same people?
  • In Slack/Teams, do people @mention you for help outside your official scope?
  • Do you get pulled into meetings for "just in case" or "we need your input"?

The Bus Factor

  • If you left tomorrow, what would break that isn't documented?
  • What do you know that lives only in your head?
  • Have you trained anyone else on these things?

Data Sources Used

When available, I'll analyze concrete signals:

Git/GitHub:

  • Commit patterns during incidents (timestamps, repos)
  • PR review requests (who asks you to review?)
  • Code ownership across repos (do you touch more than your "area"?)
  • Off-hours commit frequency

Slack:

  • @mention frequency and sources
  • Questions routed to you
  • Incident channel participation
  • DM patterns during crises

Jira/Linear:

  • Urgent ticket assignments
  • Cross-project involvement
  • Escalation patterns

If data sources are unavailable, I'll rely on conversational exploration - which can be just as valuable.

Output Options

After our exploration, I can create:

  • One-paragraph Impact Brief: A tight summary of your tiger contributions, usable in performance reviews
  • Tiger Score Card: Quantified assessment across dimensions (emergency response, knowledge hub, cross-boundary work)
  • Proof List: 3-5 concrete receipts - who benefited, what changed, what would have broken
  • Visibility Plan: Who needs to know what, and how to tell them without self-promotion

Begin by asking: What do you actually spend your time on in a typical week - not your job title, the actual work?

From the file to a first result

The download contains exactly the content displayed on this page. This copy may differ from the latest version in the source repository.

View the source and supporting files

This download contains SKILL.md only. Any scripts, references, templates and dependencies are not included. Get the required files from the source, preserving their directory structure, before continuing.

1. Download the file

Download SKILL.md

From the root of a test project, save the file as .skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md, or use the command below. This folder is for inspecting the skill before installation.

Command for macOS/Linux or WSL: requires a POSIX shell and curl. On Windows without WSL, use the download button and create the folder manually.

mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/download' --output '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md'

2. Check prerequisites

Read SKILL.md before using it. If it references scripts or external services, inspect them and prepare the required access in your test environment.

Tools declared by the author (check availability in your agent): Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, mcp__github__*, mcp__slack__*, mcp__jira__*, mcp__linear__*

No recognized prerequisites section in this file. This does not mean it is self-contained: libraries, tools and access requirements may be mentioned elsewhere in the content or source repository.

The platforms on this page are catalog indications. The paths below follow tool documentation; they do not prove this skill has been run in those tools. No minimum tool version is confirmed for this listing.

3. Load the skill

After inspection, copy the complete folder into your project using one of the commands below, then open a new tool session. The command stops if a folder with the same name already exists: compare the files before replacing it.

Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/am-i-a-tiger' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj' '.claude/skills/am-i-a-tiger'

Cursor
test -f '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.cursor/skills' && test ! -e '.cursor/skills/am-i-a-tiger' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj' '.cursor/skills/am-i-a-tiger'

OpenSkills

OpenSkills must already be installed. The local install/read procedure is checked with OpenSkills 1.5.0, which requires Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Catalog slugs are not resolved automatically.

Official OpenSkills installation
openskills install './.skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj'

openskills read 'am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj'

Reading should display the installed file content and its base directory. It does not run the skill or install its dependencies.

For an agent that reads AGENTS.md, then sync the index. This command changes AGENTS.md: review the diff before using it.

openskills sync

Manual method or another tool: attach SKILL.md to a conversation, or open it in an agent that can read files. Include any required supporting resources. No universal folder is recognized by every tool.

4. Try a first task

Use a short, synthetic input: an API endpoint, a small document or an interface brief. In a new conversation, attach the file or give the agent its path, then adapt this request:

Read .skill-downloads/am-i-a-tiger-mmbizjnj/SKILL.md and apply its instructions to this example: [describe a test input]. Identify any missing files, dependencies or access. Produce the result requested by the skill without inventing data or running unreviewed scripts.

Expected result: output matching the skill instructions, or a precise list of missing prerequisites. A read confirmation alone does not validate a first use. If an external resource is unavailable, that path remains untested.

Related skills