Architecture Decision Records (ADR)

VerifiedSafe

This skill helps document and manage architecture decisions using structured ADR templates. It guides users through context, decision drivers, options, and consequences for technical choices. Use it when evaluating new frameworks, database technologies, API designs, or security architecture.

Sby Skills Guide Bot
DocumentationBeginner
1406/2/2026
Claude CodeCopilotCursor
#architecture#decision-records#technical-documentation#adr#best-practices

Recommended for

Our review

This skill helps document significant technical decisions using structured ADR templates and best practices.

Strengths

  • Provides ready-to-use templates for different decision complexities
  • Enforces a review and approval process with senior engineers
  • Captures context, alternatives, and consequences before implementation
  • Enables long-term traceability and knowledge sharing

Limitations

  • Requires discipline to write ADRs before implementing
  • Can be time-consuming for small or reversible decisions
  • Does not cover non-technical or operational decisions
When to use it

When making important architectural or technical choices that need documented rationale, team alignment, and future reference.

When not to use it

For routine maintenance, minor version upgrades, or implementation details that don't affect the system's architecture or design.

Security analysis

Safe
Quality score95/100

The skill is a documentation guideline with no executable code or system-altering instructions. It uses only the Read tool to access reference files, posing no execution risk.

No concerns found

Examples

Database Selection ADR
Create an Architecture Decision Record for choosing PostgreSQL as our primary database. Include context about our need for ACID compliance and JSON support, list 2 alternatives (MySQL and MongoDB), and document the consequences.
ADR Review
Review our existing ADRs in the docs/adr/ directory and provide a summary of the key architectural decisions made, highlighting any that are now deprecated or superseded.
ADR Template Draft
Draft an ADR template for our team that includes sections for context, decision drivers, options considered, decision, consequences, and mitigations. Use the MADR format.

name: architecture-decision-records description: This skill should be used when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes. It provides ADR templates and best practices. allowed-tools: Read

Architecture Decision Records

Capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions using structured ADR formats.

When to Use This Skill

| Write ADR | Skip ADR | | -------------------------- | ---------------------- | | New framework adoption | Minor version upgrades | | Database technology choice | Bug fixes | | API design patterns | Implementation details | | Security architecture | Routine maintenance | | Integration patterns | Configuration changes |

Quick Start

  1. Copy the template: cp docs/adr/template.md docs/adr/NNNN-your-title.md
  2. Fill in: Context, Decision Drivers, Options, Decision, Consequences
  3. PR for review (2+ senior engineers)
  4. Update docs/adr/README.md index after merge

Core Concepts

An Architecture Decision Record captures:

  • Context: Why we needed to make a decision
  • Decision: What we decided
  • Consequences: What happens as a result

ADR Lifecycle

Proposed --> Accepted --> Deprecated --> Superseded
                |
             Rejected

Read reference/adr-lifecycle.md for status transitions, deprecation patterns, and review checklists.

Process

1. Choose a Template

Pick the format that fits the decision's complexity:

| Decision Complexity | Template | |---------------------|----------| | Simple tech selection | Y-Statement (one paragraph) | | Medium decision | Lightweight ADR (0.5-1 page) | | Significant architecture change | Standard MADR (1-2 pages) | | Retiring a decision | Deprecation ADR | | Major cross-team proposal | RFC Style (2-4 pages) |

Read reference/adr-templates.md for all template formats ready to copy-paste.

2. Write the ADR

  • Start with context -- explain the problem before the solution
  • List 2-3 real alternatives with honest pros/cons
  • State the decision clearly
  • Document both positive and negative consequences with specifics

3. Review and Approve

  • Submit as PR with 2+ senior engineer reviewers
  • Consult affected teams
  • Assess security, cost, and reversibility implications

4. Maintain

  • Update ADR index after acceptance
  • Create implementation tickets
  • Never edit accepted ADRs -- write new ones to supersede

Read reference/adr-examples.md for complete worked examples (PostgreSQL selection, TypeScript adoption, MongoDB deprecation, event sourcing RFC).

Minimal Template (Copy-Paste Starter)

# ADR-NNNN: [Title]

## Status
Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-XXXX

## Context
[Why do we need to decide this? What's the problem?]

## Decision
We will [decision].

## Consequences
- **Good**: [benefits]
- **Bad**: [drawbacks]
- **Mitigations**: [how we'll address the bad]

Common Mistakes

| Mistake | Fix | |---------|-----| | Writing ADR after implementation | Write during design phase | | Listing only one option | Always include 2-3 real alternatives | | Vague consequences | Be specific: "Adds ~200ms latency to checkout" | | Editing accepted ADRs | Write new ADR that supersedes | | No decision drivers | List explicit criteria with priorities | | Missing rejected ADRs | Document rejected options too |

Directory Structure

docs/adr/
  README.md           # Index of all ADRs
  template.md         # Team's ADR template
  0001-use-postgresql.md
  0002-caching-strategy.md

Reference Files

| File | Contents | |------|----------| | reference/adr-templates.md | All formats: MADR, lightweight, Y-statement, deprecation, RFC | | reference/adr-examples.md | Complete worked examples for each format | | reference/adr-lifecycle.md | Status transitions, review checklists, automation with adr-tools |

Resources

Error Handling

Conflicting ADRs: When a new decision contradicts an existing ADR, create a superseding ADR that explicitly references and deprecates the old one.

Missing context: If the decision rationale is unclear or incomplete, flag it and request clarification before recording.

Related skills