Automated summary
The CLARIFYING phase of a design workflow that discusses each work item one at a time to pin down requirements before moving into design.
Strengths
- Enforces strictly sequential handling: one question at a time and no batching of items
- Updates the design document via MCP after each answer, so context survives compaction
- Flags oversized items (more than 5-6 files, more than 2 distinct concerns) and proposes splitting them into sub-items
- Can render multiple-choice questions in a browser UI when a collaborative session is active
Limitations
- Depends on supporting infrastructure: collab-state.json, the mermaid-collab MCP plugin, and a readable design doc
- Not user-invocable (user-invocable: false), so it only runs as a step inside a larger workflow
- Output quality rests entirely on the questions asked; there is no automated validation that requirements are complete
Use it when a set of work items needs to be clarified individually before the design document is written.
Avoid it for quick exploration or immediate prototyping, where one-question-at-a-time elicitation adds too much delay.
Security analysis
SafeThe skill is a procedural workflow guide for a clarifying phase. It declares Bash and broad MCP tools but does not instruct destructive, exfiltrating, or obfuscated actions; tool use is limited to reading context, asking questions, updating design docs, and completing the workflow.
No concerns found
How this analysis is madeExamples
Start the clarifying phase for the work items in my design doc and ask me about each one, one question at a time.Focus only on the current item and ask me clarifying questions about it until nothing is left to discuss.This item touches the API, the UI and the auth layer. Check whether it should be split into smaller work items before we move to designing.name: brainstorming-clarifying description: The CLARIFYING phase discusses each item one at a time to fully understand requirements user-invocable: false allowed-tools:
- Read
- Glob
- Grep
- Bash
- AskUserQuestion
- mcp__plugin_mermaid-collab_mermaid__*
CLARIFYING Phase
The CLARIFYING phase discusses each item one at a time to fully understand requirements before designing.
Purpose
- Discuss ONE item at a time (never batch multiple items)
- Ask questions to refine each item
- Ensure all requirements are captured
- Confirm nothing else needs discussion
Process
-
Present first item:
- State the item clearly
- Ask clarifying questions about it
-
For each item:
- Ask questions to refine understanding
- Prefer multiple choice questions when possible
- One question at a time
- Wait for answer before next question
-
After each item is discussed:
- Summarize understanding
- Move to next item
-
After all items discussed:
- Ask: "Is there anything else?"
- Only proceed when user confirms nothing else
Single-Item Mode (CLARIFYING)
When currentItem is set in collab-state.json:
- Ask questions about this specific item (one at a time)
- Do NOT explore other items or expand scope
- Ask: "Is there anything else about this item?"
Incremental Design Doc Updates
After each substantive user answer during CLARIFYING phase:
- Output: "Updating [field] for Item [N]..."
- Read current design doc via MCP
- Update the relevant field (Problem/Goal, Approach, Success Criteria, or Decisions)
- Write updated doc via MCP
- Output: "Updated [field] for Item [N]"
This ensures context survives compaction - the design doc is the persistent record.
Question Best Practices
Prefer multiple choice:
Which approach do you prefer?
1. Option A - [brief description]
2. Option B - [brief description]
3. Other (please specify)
Use browser-based questions when collab session active:
Tool: mcp__plugin_mermaid-collab_mermaid__render_ui
Args: {
"project": "<absolute-path-to-cwd>",
"session": "<session-name>",
"ui": {
"type": "Card",
"props": { "title": "Select an option" },
"children": [{
"type": "MultipleChoice",
"props": {
"options": [
{ "value": "1", "label": "Option 1" },
{ "value": "2", "label": "Option 2" }
],
"name": "choice"
}
}],
"actions": [{ "id": "submit", "label": "Submit", "primary": true }]
},
"blocking": true
}
Auto-Decomposition Check
REQUIRED before transitioning to DESIGNING, for each work item:
-
Analyze item scope:
- Count affected files mentioned in approach
- Count distinct concerns (auth, API, UI, tests, etc.)
- Estimate number of tasks
-
If item looks large (any of these triggers):
- More than 5-6 files affected
- More than 2 distinct concerns
- Would result in more than 10 tasks
-
Present decomposition proposal:
This item looks large: - Files: [N] affected - Concerns: [list distinct areas] - Estimated tasks: [N] I see [N] pieces: 1. [Sub-component 1]: [files/concern] 2. [Sub-component 2]: [files/concern] 3. [Sub-component 3]: [files/concern] Split into separate work items? 1. Yes - split into [N] items (Recommended for complex work) 2. No - keep as single item -
If user selects 1 (Yes):
- Create new work items in design doc for each sub-component
- Mark original item as superseded
- Continue CLARIFYING with new items
-
If user selects 2 (No):
- Keep as single item
- Proceed to DESIGNING
Why auto-decomposition matters:
- Smaller items create smaller per-item documents
- Smaller documents reduce context bloat
- Parallel execution of independent items
Exit Criteria
- Each item discussed individually (not batched)
- Asked "Is there anything else?"
- User confirmed nothing else to discuss
Transition to DESIGNING
Prerequisites:
- Each item discussed individually (not batched)
- Asked "Is there anything else?"
- User confirmed nothing else to discuss
Announce: "All items clarified. Now let me present the design approach."
Completion
At the end of this skill's work, call complete_skill:
Tool: mcp__plugin_mermaid-collab_mermaid__complete_skill
Args: { "project": "<cwd>", "session": "<session>", "skill": "brainstorming-clarifying" }
Handle response:
- If
action == "clear": Invoke skill: collab-clear - If
next_skillis not null: Invoke that skill - If
next_skillis null: Workflow complete
From the file to a first result
The download contains exactly the content displayed on this page. This copy may differ from the latest version in the source repository.
View the source and supporting filesThis download contains SKILL.md only. Any scripts, references, templates and dependencies are not included. Get the required files from the source, preserving their directory structure, before continuing.
1. Download the file
Download SKILL.mdFrom the root of a test project, save the file as .skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/SKILL.md, or use the command below. This folder is for inspecting the skill before installation.
Command for macOS/Linux or WSL: requires a POSIX shell and curl. On Windows without WSL, use the download button and create the folder manually.
mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/download' --output '.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/SKILL.md'2. Check prerequisites
Read SKILL.md before using it. If it references scripts or external services, inspect them and prepare the required access in your test environment.
No recognized prerequisites section in this file. This does not mean it is self-contained: libraries, tools and access requirements may be mentioned elsewhere in the content or source repository.
The platforms on this page are catalog indications. The paths below follow tool documentation; they do not prove this skill has been run in those tools. No minimum tool version is confirmed for this listing.
3. Load the skill
After inspection, copy the complete folder into your project using one of the commands below, then open a new tool session. The command stops if a folder with the same name already exists: compare the files before replacing it.
Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/brainstorming-clarifying' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd' '.claude/skills/brainstorming-clarifying'OpenSkills
OpenSkills must already be installed. The local install/read procedure is checked with OpenSkills 1.5.0, which requires Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Catalog slugs are not resolved automatically.
Official OpenSkills installationopenskills install './.skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd'openskills read 'clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd'Reading should display the installed file content and its base directory. It does not run the skill or install its dependencies.
For an agent that reads AGENTS.md, then sync the index. This command changes AGENTS.md: review the diff before using it.
openskills syncManual method or another tool: attach SKILL.md to a conversation, or open it in an agent that can read files. Include any required supporting resources. No universal folder is recognized by every tool.
4. Try a first task
Use a short, synthetic input: an API endpoint, a small document or an interface brief. In a new conversation, attach the file or give the agent its path, then adapt this request:
Read .skill-downloads/clarifying-phase-ms1aw4hd/SKILL.md and apply its instructions to this example: [describe a test input]. Identify any missing files, dependencies or access. Produce the result requested by the skill without inventing data or running unreviewed scripts.Expected result: output matching the skill instructions, or a precise list of missing prerequisites. A read confirmation alone does not validate a first use. If an external resource is unavailable, that path remains untested.
React Hook Form Best Practices
Development
Master React Hook Form: avoid anti-patterns, manage subscriptions, and handle reset, dirty state, and controlled inputs correctly.
Emotion to Mantine Migration
Development
Migrate Emotion styled-components to Mantine components with style props and CSS modules. Use when converting .styled.tsx files or removing @emotion imports.
Scope Creep Detector
Development
Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad PRs, and oversized changes, then suggests keep, split, or justify actions.