name: pr description: Create a pull request
Create a pull request
I'll create a pull request for the current branch by following these steps. If any steps fail, stop.
Mode — check the arguments passed to this skill (shown at the end). If they
include reviewed (or skip-review), an upstream step already ran the
code-reviewer and fixed its findings (e.g. /deliver's code-review phase), so
skip steps 5–7 to avoid reviewing identical code twice. Otherwise (standalone
/pr), run the internal review as normal.
Also skip steps 5–7 when the branch changes no Swift — code review is for Swift, so a docs-only / config-only PR needs none:
git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD | grep -qE '\.swift$' || echo "no-swift → skip review"
-
Run
/formatto format code -
Commit all outstanding work. Run
git status. If the working tree has any uncommitted or unstaged changes (the feature work, plus the formatting from step 1), stage and commit them — the PR reflects committed history only, so anything left uncommitted will be missing from the PR. First verify no secrets,.env, or build artifacts are included (per CLAUDE.md —.envmust stay gitignored; checkgit statusbeforegit add). Use a descriptive gitmoji message (or several logical commits if the work spans concerns); formatting-only changes can use "🎨 apply code formatting". If the tree is already clean (e.g. work was committed during/deliver), this is a no-op. -
Rebase onto the latest
origin/main. Fetch the remote and rebase the feature branch directly ontoorigin/main— do this beforemake ciso the gate (and the eventual PR) reflects the real merge result, not stale code:git fetch origin git rebase origin/main- Rebase onto
origin/main, not localmain— this is worktree-safe. A/deliverruns inside a git worktree, andgit checkout mainthere fails (fatal: 'main' is already used by worktree …) whenever the main checkout is onmain; rebasing ontoorigin/mainavoids checkingmainout at all and uses the true remote base directly. - If
git rebasereports conflicts, stop, resolve them, then continue. Never skip or force past a conflict you don't understand. - The rebase rewrites the branch tip, so a branch that was already pushed will need
git push --force-with-leaseat the push step below. - Already branched off an up-to-date
origin/mainwith nothing to replay → this is a fast no-op.
- Rebase onto
-
Run the pre-PR gate — MANDATORY; it must pass before going further. Run it directly (do not delegate). If it fails, stop and fix — commit the fixes — then re-run; never open a PR on a red gate. Scale the gate to the diff:
-
Default — full
make ci. The gate CLAUDE.md requires before any PR: lint, markdown lint, unit tests, integration tests, the release build, and the docs build. Use this whenever any code or build-affecting file changed. -
Docs/config-only fast gate. When the diff touches no build- or test-affecting files — i.e. no
*.swiftand none ofMakefile,Package.swift,Package.resolved,*.xctestplan, or.github/workflows/**— the test/release-build legs ofmake cihave nothing to exercise. Run only the meaningful checks instead:make lint && make lint-markdown && make build-docs(dropbuild-docsif no*.docc/**changed). Detect this with:git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD \ | grep -qE '\.swift$|^Makefile$|^Package\.(swift|resolved)$|\.xctestplan$|^\.github/workflows/' \ && echo "code/build touched → full make ci" \ || echo "docs/config-only → fast gate"The PR's own CI still runs the full matrix regardless, so this only trims the local gate; it never lowers what actually guards
main. When in doubt, run fullmake ci. -
Re-lint new Swift files without the cache.
make ci's lint leg isswiftlint --strict .(Makefile), and SwiftLint caches results (~/Library/Caches/SwiftLint). On newly-added.swiftfiles this has been seen to report a false green locally — passingfile_length/type_body_lengththat the PR's CILintjob (a clean checkout, no cache) then fails on. So when the diff adds any new.swiftfile (git diff --name-only --diff-filter=A origin/main...HEAD | grep -q '\.swift$'), run a cache-bypassing lint before trusting the gate:swiftlint lint --strict --no-cache .Fix anything it flags (oversized files: split, or add a
// swiftlint:disabledirective matching theAccountService+Pagination.swiftprecedent) and re-run. This catches file-size violations locally instead of on a CI round-trip.
-
-
(skip in
reviewedmode or when no Swift changed) Spawn thecode-revieweragent to perform a code review of all changes (pass the git diff output as context) -
(skip in
reviewedmode or when no Swift changed) Summarize the code review findings:- List any critical or high-severity issues that should be addressed
- List any medium-severity suggestions for improvement
- Note any low-severity or stylistic recommendations
-
(skip in
reviewedmode or when no Swift changed) If there are critical/high-severity issues:- Recommend specific changes needed
- Ask user for confirmation before proceeding (fix issues or continue anyway)
- If user wants to fix issues, stop and let them address the feedback
-
Ensure a clean working tree before pushing. Re-run
git status; commit anything still outstanding (e.g. review fixes from steps 5–7, ormake cifixes) so the push includes everything. The tree must be clean before proceeding. Then rungit diff origin/main...HEADto understand all changes going into the PR. -
Analyze the commits and changes to generate an appropriate title and summary
-
Push the current branch to remote (
git push -u origin <branch>if not yet pushed; otherwisegit push— usegit push --force-with-leaseif you rebased in step 3) -
Create a PR with the GitHub MCP —
mcp__github__create_pull_request(owner/repo from theoriginremote,base: main,head: <branch>, plustitle/body). The branch must already be pushed (step 10). If the call fails with 401/403 (PAT expired or missing scope), fall back togh pr createwith the same title/body.Title — MUST start with a gitmoji prefix matching the change:
| Emoji | Code | Use for | |-------|------|---------| | ✨ |
:sparkles:| New features | | 🐛 |:bug:| Bug fixes | | 📝 |:memo:| Documentation updates | | ♻️ |:recycle:| Refactoring | | ✅ |:white_check_mark:| Adding/updating tests | | 🔧 |:wrench:| Configuration changes | | ⚡️ |:zap:| Performance improvements | | 🎨 |:art:| Code style/formatting |Example:
✨ Add createdBy property to TVSeries.Body — fill this skeleton, keeping only the sections that apply, and end with the attribution line exactly as shown:
## Summary [Brief description of what this PR does and why] ## Changes **New Model/Feature/Component:** - ✨ [Description] **Existing Files:** - 📝 [Description] **Tests:** - ✅ [Description of test coverage] **Documentation:** - 📚 [Description] ## Benefits - **[Benefit Category]**: [Description] 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
$ARGUMENTS
Next.js App Router Expert
Development
A skill that turns Claude into a Next.js App Router expert.
README Generator
Development
Creates professional and comprehensive README.md files for your projects.
API Documentation Writer
Development
Generates comprehensive API documentation in OpenAPI/Swagger format.