Our review
Creates a conventionally named branch, splits work into atomic commits, pushes it, and opens a pull request with a terse title and a body explaining the why.
Strengths
- Consistently enforces the `<type>/<description>` branch scheme and Conventional Commits, including renaming auto-generated branches in place via `git branch -m`.
- Drives atomic commits and per-file staging while explicitly refusing to stage secret files (.env, keys, certificates).
- Keeps context small by reading only the relevant per-file hunks instead of running a full `git diff`.
- Constrains the PR itself: title under 70 characters, explanatory body, `!` marker plus `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer for breakages.
Limitations
- Requires git and an authenticated `gh` CLI, and assumes a GitHub remote (gh repo view, gh pr create).
- Stops at PR creation — it does not handle review, conflict resolution, or merging.
- Triggering leans on explicit phrasings (create pr, open pull request, /create-pr) rather than broad intent detection.
Use it when local changes are ready to ship and you want a clean branch, readable commits, and a well-formed pull request produced in one pass.
Avoid it for repos not hosted on GitHub, for editing or reviewing an existing PR, or when the user wants to hand-craft each commit individually.
Security analysis
SafeThe skill uses scoped git and gh CLI commands for standard version control and pull request creation. It includes safeguards like avoiding `git add -A`, never staging secret files, and selective diff reading. No destructive, exfiltrating, or obfuscated actions are present, and allowed tools are narrowly restricted to legitimate operations.
No concerns found
Examples
I'm done with the login redirect fix — commit it and open a pull request against main.create pr/create-prname: create-pr allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash(git checkout:), Bash(git add:), Bash(git status:), Bash(git diff:), Bash(git log:), Bash(git branch:), Bash(git rev-parse:), Bash(git push:), Bash(git commit:), Bash(git worktree:), Bash(gh pr create:), Bash(gh pr list:), Bash(gh repo view:), Bash(gh label list:) description: > Create branch, atomic commits, push, and open a pull request with terse, exact messages. Conventional branch + commit format. PR title ≤70 chars, body says "why", not "what". Use when the user says "create pr", "create pullrequest", "create pull request", "make pr", "open pr", "open pullrequest", "open pull request", "submit pr", "raise pr", "/create-pr", or asks to ship/send changes as a pull request (PR/pullrequest/pull-request, any spelling).
Context
- Current git status: !
git status --short - Diff summary vs HEAD (file + line counts): !
git diff HEAD --stat - Current branch: !
git branch --show-current - Default branch: !
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name' 2>/dev/null || echo "main" - Recent commits on this branch: !
git log --oneline -10
The full diff is intentionally NOT loaded above. To write the PR body, read only what you need:
- Per-file hunks:
git diff <base>...HEAD -- <file>(replace<base>with the default branch) - Branch-wide stat:
git diff <base>...HEAD --statDo not run unfilteredgit diff— it floods context for nothing.
Your task
Create a branch (if needed), commit changes as atomic commits, push, and open a pull request. Terse and exact at every layer: branch name, commit messages, PR title, PR body.
Steps
-
Detect base branch — use the default branch from context above. Target the PR against this branch.
-
Ensure a valid branch name —
<type>/<short-description>convention before pushing.- Valid types:
feat,fix,chore,refactor,docs,style,perf,test,build,ci,revert - Pick a name based on the changes (e.g.,
feat/add-user-export,fix/login-redirect) - If on the default branch: create a new branch with
git checkout -b <type>/<short-description> - If on a non-conventional branch (e.g., auto-generated worktree branches like
claude/..., or any name not matching the convention): rename it in place withgit branch -m <type>/<short-description>. This works inside worktrees too. - If already on a conventional branch: keep it.
- Valid types:
-
Analyze and stage changes — read the code to understand what changed and why. Stage specific files by name. Do NOT use
git add -Aorgit add .. NEVER stage secret files (.env,*.key,*.pem, credentials, tokens). -
Create atomic commits — split into multiple commits when changes involve different concerns, types, or file patterns. Each commit must build and make sense on its own.
Subject line:
<type>(<scope>): <imperative summary>—<scope>optional- Types:
feat,fix,refactor,perf,docs,test,chore,build,ci,style,revert - Imperative mood: "add", "fix", "remove" — not "added", "adds"
- ≤50 chars when possible, hard cap 72
- No trailing period
- Match project convention for capitalization after the colon
Body (only if needed):
- Skip when the subject is self-explanatory
- Add for: non-obvious why, breaking changes, migration notes, linked issues
- Wrap at 72 chars, bullets
-not* - Reference issues at end:
Closes #42,Refs #17
Always include body for: breaking changes, security fixes, data migrations, reverts.
Breaking changes: mark subject with
!and add aBREAKING CHANGE:footer.What NEVER goes in: "This commit does X", "I"/"we"/"now"/"currently", "As requested by...", AI attribution, emoji (unless project convention), filename restated when scope covers it.
Use HEREDOC for commit messages.
-
Push the branch — use
git push -u origin <branch>. -
Create the PR using
gh pr create:Title:
- Same format as a commit subject:
<type>(<scope>): <imperative summary> - Under 70 chars, no trailing period
- If the branch has one commit, reuse its subject. If multiple, summarize the overall change.
Labels:
- Infer appropriate labels from the change type and content. Use
--labelflags (one per label). - Common labels:
bug,enhancement,documentation,refactor,dependencies,breaking-change. - Only apply labels that exist in the repository. Run
gh label listfirst to check. If none match, skip labeling.
Body — terse, why over what:
gh pr create --title "title" --label "label1" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' - why this change exists (not a diff restatement) - notable decisions or tradeoffs ## Test plan - [ ] concrete step a reviewer can run - [ ] edge case covered EOF )"Body rules:
- No
## Summaryheading — open the body directly with why-bullets. The PR title already names the change; a heading would just repeat it. ## Test planis mandatory — always include it with concrete, actionable steps a reviewer can run (commands, URLs, edge cases). Avoid vague items like "test it works".- Analyze ALL commits on the branch for the why-bullets, not just the latest
- Why-bullets state the why, not a list of files touched
- Bullets
-not* - No AI attribution, no "Generated with Claude Code"
- No emoji unless project convention requires
- Add other sections only when applicable (skip otherwise):
## Related issues— when commits reference issues (#123,fixes #456), listCloses #N## Breaking changes— for breaking changes, include migration notes## Screenshots— for UI changes, include before/after images or a short clip
- Same format as a commit subject:
-
Output the PR URL after creation.
Edge Cases
- No changes at all: say so and stop. Do not create an empty PR.
- Branch already has an open PR: surface the existing URL instead of creating a duplicate (
gh pr list --head <branch>). - Push fails due to diverged history: do NOT force push. Inform the user and stop.
Next.js App Router Expert
Development
A skill that turns Claude into a Next.js App Router expert.
README Generator
Development
Creates professional and comprehensive README.md files for your projects.
API Documentation Writer
Development
Generates comprehensive API documentation in OpenAPI/Swagger format.