Our review
Transforms AI-generated technical documents into a more natural human writing style by removing common AI patterns.
Strengths
- Removes decorative symbols and rigid tables
- Adds colloquial tone and first-person pronouns for subjectivity
- Incorporates real-world examples and speculative analysis
- Simplifies section structure to avoid rigid numbering
Limitations
- May not suit formal documents requiring an objective tone
- Subjective opinions might be inappropriate in some contexts
- Relies on user judgment to apply each rule appropriately
When you have AI-generated technical content that reads synthetically and you want it to feel like it was written by a human expert.
When you need to maintain strict formal language or objective factual reporting without personal opinions.
Security analysis
SafeThe skill only instructs text transformation (removing emojis, adjusting tone, etc.) without any code execution, network access, or file system operations beyond reading/writing documents for the user. No dangerous commands or tools are invoked.
No concerns found
Examples
/de-ai /path/to/rendering_guide.md/de-ai 本段内容是由AI生成的,它包含很多符号和表格,需要被改写为更自然的风格。✓ 检查点 ✅ 完成项 ⚠️ 注意项。以下是一些技术要点:Please humanize this game development document: The rendering pipeline can be optimized using occlusion culling. Advantages include reduced draw calls and improved performance. Disadvantages include added complexity.name: de-ai description: Remove AI-style patterns from technical documents, making them read more naturally like human-written content. Trigger when user asks to "de-AI", "humanize", or "polish" a document.
De-AI: Remove AI Writing Patterns
Transform AI-assisted technical documents (especially game development & rendering docs) into more natural, human-like writing.
Usage
/de-ai <file path or text content>
Instructions
You are helping the user remove AI-style patterns from technical documents. Apply the following transformations:
1. Remove Decorative Symbols
- Delete all emoji-like symbols: ✓ ✗ ❌ ✅ ⚠️ 💡 🎯 📌 🔥 ⭐ etc.
- Express "correct/incorrect" or "pros/cons" using plain text instead
2. Minimize Table Usage
- Do not use tables for comparisons or summaries
- Convert tables to concise prose paragraphs or simple bullet lists
- Example: Instead of a comparison table, write: "方案A的优点是xxx,缺点是xxx;方案B则..."
3. Add Colloquial Tone and Subjectivity
- Use first-person pronouns: "我们"、"我认为"、"我的理解是"
- Allow uncertainty expressions: "也许"、"可能"、"大概"、"应该是"
- Be honest about uncertain information rather than stating everything as fact
- Add personal judgments: "我觉得这样做的原因可能是..."
4. Include Subjective Opinions and Real-World Examples
- When introducing a technique, proactively mention how other games or projects use it
- Examples:
- "《原神》的渲染管线也采用了类似的方案"
- "UE5的Nanite在处理这个问题时..."
- "我猜测他们这样设计是因为..."
- Add speculative analysis: "这可能是出于性能考量"
- These examples and opinions add depth and authenticity
5. Simplify Section Structure
- Avoid deep nested numbering (like 1.1.1, 1.1.2)
- Use flexible structure instead:
- Major sections:
##headings - Subsections:
###or bold text as lead-ins - No strict numbering required; use descriptive titles
- Major sections:
- Humans rarely maintain rigid hierarchical numbering due to high maintenance cost
6. Additional Guidelines
- Vary sentence length; avoid uniform sentence patterns
- Use colloquial connectors: "说白了"、"换句话说"、"简单来说"
- Add transitional sentences between paragraphs instead of rigid enumeration
- Don't end every section with a summary sentence
Output Requirements
- If user provides a file path, read the file and rewrite it
- If user provides text directly, rewrite that text
- Output the rewritten result directly without explaining what was changed
- Preserve technical accuracy; only adjust the writing style
Content Repurposer
Content
Transforms a single piece of content into platform-adapted publications.
SEO Blog Post Writer
Content
Writes SEO-optimized blog posts with proper structure and keywords.
YouTube Script Writer
Content
Writes engaging YouTube scripts with hooks, structure, and retention.