Dify Docs Terminology Check

VerifiedSafe

Audit terminology consistency across documentation against the codebase UI labels and the glossary. Covers full files, not just diffs; excludes env var docs.

Sby Skills Guide Bot
DocumentationIntermediate
7/29/2026
Claude CodeCursorCodex
#terminology#glossary#i18n#docs-audit#consistency

Recommended for

Automated summary

Performs a read-only terminology audit of a Dify documentation file, checking it against the glossary and the UI labels defined in the codebase i18n files.

Strengths

  • Clearly separates general body-text terms (glossary) from UI labels (codebase i18n), with a deterministic classification procedure.
  • Pins an exact git ref (commit) and cites it in the report, making every check reproducible.
  • Covers whole files and their zh/ja siblings rather than just the diff, and correctly excludes environment-variable documentation.
  • Flags casing or wording drift through a fallback case-insensitive search.

Limitations

  • Assumes local access to the Dify repo and its specific glossary/i18n layout, so it is not reusable as-is on other projects.
  • The audit is strictly read-only: it reports findings but never fixes the terms.
  • Result quality depends on the branch the user selects and on how current the glossary is.
When to use it

Run it after finalizing a documentation draft, before review or opening a PR, to confirm terms match the glossary and the product's actual UI strings.

When not to use it

Avoid it when the Dify repo is not available locally, or when you want terms fixed automatically instead of a findings report.

Security analysis

Safe
Quality score90/100

The skill is explicitly read-only and instructs the agent not to modify files, checkout branches, or pull in the Dify tree. It uses only non-destructive inspection commands (git fetch, git rev-parse, git grep, grep) to compare documentation terminology against a glossary and codebase i18n files. No data exfiltration, obfuscation, or destructive actions are present.

No concerns found

How this analysis is made

Examples

Pre-PR terminology check
I just finished the draft at en/guides/workflow/nodes.mdx — check terminology against the glossary and the Dify codebase before I open the PR. Use the main branch.
Verify glossary terms
Run a terminology audit on this file: verify glossary terms and bolded headings, and tell me which ones are actually UI labels in the en-US i18n.
Include translated siblings
Check terms in docs/en/features/knowledge-base.mdx plus its zh and ja siblings, and cite the commit ref you checked against.

name: dify-docs-terminology-check description: > Audit terminology consistency across documentation against the codebase UI labels and the glossary. Covers full files, not just diffs; excludes env var docs. Use after finalizing a draft, or when the user says "check terminology", "check terms", "verify glossary", or "terminology audit".

Terminology Consistency Check

Read-only audit. Verify that documentation terms match the glossary (general terms) and the Dify codebase i18n (UI labels). Covers the whole file, not just the diff. Do NOT modify any files during the audit; report findings and stop.

Step 1 — Read the sources of truth

  1. Read writing-guides/glossary.md. Two sections matter here:
    • ## General Terms — standard body-text terms with English/Chinese/Japanese columns.
    • ## UI Labels — product UI strings with an i18n Key column mapping each label to the codebase.
  2. Locate the Dify codebase. If it is available as an additional working directory, use it; otherwise ask the user for the local path to their Dify repo.
  3. Ask the user: "Which branch in the Dify codebase should I check UI labels against?" (e.g., main, a feature branch). Default to main if they have no preference.

Step 2 — Pin the codebase ref

  1. Sync and read the Dify codebase per writing-guides/index.md → "Syncing the Dify codebase safely". Never git checkout or git pull in the Dify tree.
  2. Fetch, then resolve the ref once and record it for the report. In the Dify repo:
    git fetch --tags origin
    REF=$(git rev-parse origin/<branch>)
    
    All i18n lookups below use "$REF"; the report cites it (short form, e.g. 61d2ad572a).

Step 3 — Set the scope

  1. Default scope: the whole file(s) currently under review (not just the diff), plus their zh/ja siblings when they exist. Expand to a directory or the full docs tree only if the user says so.
  2. Skip zh/ja checks for files whose translations don't exist yet.
  3. Always exclude (env var names are not UI labels):
    • en/self-host/deploy/configuration/environments.mdx
    • zh/self-host/deploy/configuration/environments.mdx
    • ja/self-host/deploy/configuration/environments.mdx

Step 4 — Extract candidate terms

For each file in scope, in the docs repo:

grep -anoE '\*\*[^*]+\*\*' <file>    # bolded terms, prints line:**term**
grep -anE '^#{2,3} ' <file>          # section headings, prints line:## Heading

The -a flag is required: some legacy zh/ja pages contain stray NUL bytes, and without it grep prints only Binary file … matches and silently drops the term inventory.

Every bolded term and every heading is a candidate. Step 5 decides deterministically which are UI labels; do not pre-filter by intuition.

Step 5 — Classify and verify UI labels against codebase i18n

The codebase i18n is the source of truth for UI labels: web/i18n/en-US/ (flat JSON files with dot-flattened keys, e.g. "menus.apps": "Studio"), plus zh-Hans/ and ja-JP/ siblings. The glossary's i18n Key column maps to them: common.menus.apps → file common.json, key "menus.apps".

For each candidate term (use the English term; for zh/ja files, take the candidate from the same position in the en sibling):

  1. If the term has a ## UI Labels row in the glossary, read its i18n Key; skip to substep 3 to confirm the codebase still agrees.
  2. Otherwise search the en-US i18n values. In the Dify repo:
    git grep -nF '"<Term>"' "$REF" -- 'web/i18n/en-US/*.json'
    
    • Exact-value hit (e.g., <REF>:web/i18n/en-US/common.json:285: "menus.apps": "Studio",) → it is a UI label; note the file and key.
    • No hit → retry case-insensitively: git grep -inF '<term>' "$REF" -- 'web/i18n/en-US/*.json'. A hit here means the doc's casing or wording deviates from the UI string — flag it.
    • Still no hit → not a UI label. Headings fall out of scope here; bolded terms go to Step 6 (general terms) instead.
  3. Confirm the exact string at the key:
    git grep -nF '"<key>"' "$REF" -- web/i18n/en-US/<file>.json
    
    The doc's English term must match the printed value exactly (casing included). If the glossary row disagrees with the codebase, the codebase wins — record a glossary gap.
  4. For zh/ja siblings, look up the same key in the matching locale:
    git grep -nF '"<key>"' "$REF" -- web/i18n/zh-Hans/<file>.json
    git grep -nF '"<key>"' "$REF" -- web/i18n/ja-JP/<file>.json
    
    Each prints one line with the localized string; the zh/ja doc's bolded term must match it exactly.

Step 6 — Check general terms against the glossary

For candidates that are not UI labels, and for terms noticed while reading the prose:

  1. Find the term's row: grep -in '<term>' writing-guides/glossary.md. Expected output: the table row(s) containing the term; no hit means the term is not standardized (consider it for Glossary Gaps if it recurs).
  2. Verify the file's usage against the column for its language — English column for en/, Chinese for zh/, Japanese for ja/. Honor the row's Notes (casing rules, context restrictions). Flag every deviation with its line number.

Step 7 — Report

Report findings in this format, then STOP. Do not edit any file until the user responds.

## Terminology Check Results

Checked against Dify codebase `origin/<branch>` at `<short REF>`.

### File: {path}

**General Terms**
- ✅ No issues found
  OR
- ⚠️ Line {n}: "{found}" should be "{expected}" per glossary

**UI Labels**
- ✅ All UI labels (bolded terms and feature section headings) match codebase
  OR
- ⚠️ Line {n}: **{label}** — codebase says "{expected}" (web/i18n/<locale>/<file>.json, key "<key>")

**Glossary Gaps**
- Terms used in docs but missing from glossary: {list}
- Glossary entries outdated compared to codebase: {list}

Step 8 — Glossary updates (only after user approval)

If the user approves fixes for Glossary Gaps:

  1. Edit writing-guides/glossary.md with the approved rows.
  2. Regenerate the termbase. In the docs repo:
    python3 tools/translate/derive-termbase.py
    
    Must print Generated .../tools/translate/termbase_i18n.md.
  3. Verify sync:
    python3 tools/translate/derive-termbase.py --check
    
    Must print termbase_i18n.md is in sync with glossary.md. and exit 0. git diff tools/translate/termbase_i18n.md must show only rows corresponding to the approved glossary edits.

From the file to a first result

The download contains exactly the content displayed on this page. This copy may differ from the latest version in the source repository.

View the source and supporting files

This download contains SKILL.md only. Any scripts, references, templates and dependencies are not included. Get the required files from the source, preserving their directory structure, before continuing.

1. Download the file

Download SKILL.md

From the root of a test project, save the file as .skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md, or use the command below. This folder is for inspecting the skill before installation.

Command for macOS/Linux or WSL: requires a POSIX shell and curl. On Windows without WSL, use the download button and create the folder manually.

mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/download' --output '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md'

2. Check prerequisites

Read SKILL.md before using it. If it references scripts or external services, inspect them and prepare the required access in your test environment.

No recognized prerequisites section in this file. This does not mean it is self-contained: libraries, tools and access requirements may be mentioned elsewhere in the content or source repository.

The platforms on this page are catalog indications. The paths below follow tool documentation; they do not prove this skill has been run in those tools. No minimum tool version is confirmed for this listing.

3. Load the skill

After inspection, copy the complete folder into your project using one of the commands below, then open a new tool session. The command stops if a folder with the same name already exists: compare the files before replacing it.

Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/dify-docs-terminology-check' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77' '.claude/skills/dify-docs-terminology-check'

Cursor
test -f '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.cursor/skills' && test ! -e '.cursor/skills/dify-docs-terminology-check' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77' '.cursor/skills/dify-docs-terminology-check'

Codex
test -f '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.agents/skills' && test ! -e '.agents/skills/dify-docs-terminology-check' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77' '.agents/skills/dify-docs-terminology-check'

OpenSkills

OpenSkills must already be installed. The local install/read procedure is checked with OpenSkills 1.5.0, which requires Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Catalog slugs are not resolved automatically.

Official OpenSkills installation
openskills install './.skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77'

openskills read 'dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77'

Reading should display the installed file content and its base directory. It does not run the skill or install its dependencies.

For an agent that reads AGENTS.md, then sync the index. This command changes AGENTS.md: review the diff before using it.

openskills sync

Manual method or another tool: attach SKILL.md to a conversation, or open it in an agent that can read files. Include any required supporting resources. No universal folder is recognized by every tool.

4. Try a first task

Use a short, synthetic input: an API endpoint, a small document or an interface brief. In a new conversation, attach the file or give the agent its path, then adapt this request:

Read .skill-downloads/dify-docs-terminology-check-ms5lrg77/SKILL.md and apply its instructions to this example: [describe a test input]. Identify any missing files, dependencies or access. Produce the result requested by the skill without inventing data or running unreviewed scripts.

Expected result: output matching the skill instructions, or a precise list of missing prerequisites. A read confirmation alone does not validate a first use. If an external resource is unavailable, that path remains untested.

Related skills