name: harsh description: complete a comprehensive and brutally honest critical review of your manuscript. The review identifies major methodological flaws and areas where the work falls short of publication standards for a high-impact clinical journal.
Harsh
This command will complete a comprehensive and brutally honest critical review of your manuscript. The review identifies major methodological flaws and areas where the work falls short of publication standards for a high-impact clinical journal.
When to use
- When preparing a manuscript for submission to a high-impact clinical journal
- When you need honest feedback about methodological weaknesses
- When you want to identify publication-blocking issues before submission
- When seeking to improve the scientific rigor of your work
Instructions
- Read the README.md and CLAUDE.md to understand the project purpose, setup instructions, and key information
- Provide a concise overview of the project based on the gathered context
- Focus on ./result and ./manuscripts
- Save the harsh critical comment in the ./docs/
- Give a plan to fix the problem that will contributing meaningful biological insights
API Documentation Generator
Documentation
Automatically generates OpenAPI/Swagger API documentation.
Technical Writer
Documentation
Writes clear technical documentation following top style guides.
Typed Documentation Forms System
Documentation
Add typed comments, documentation, todos, and metadata to Scheme code using `(doc ...)` forms. Doc annotations are authoritative for type inference, extracted by search commands (lf-todo, lf-types), and integrated with the type checker and LSP. Useful for annotating functions, marking deprecations, or tracking localized improvements alongside the code.