name: leetcode description: Log a solved (or attempted) coding problem into the DSA area with pattern analysis and honest review. Use whenever the user runs /leetcode, pastes a solution, shares a LeetCode/HackerRank/Codeforces problem they worked on, says "I just solved...", "review my solution", or "log this problem" — even if they only paste code with no explanation.

Log a coding problem

Capture each practice problem as a pattern-tagged entry so the vault reveals, over time, which patterns the user has mastered and which keep costing them.

Inputs to gather

From the user's message (ask only for what's missing, in one question):

• Problem name/link, their solution (pasted or a file path)
• Whether they solved it unaided, and roughly how long it took
• Where they got stuck, if anywhere

Procedure

1. Identify the pattern(s) — the reusable technique, not the topic. "Two pointers on sorted array", not "arrays".
2. Review the solution honestly. Correctness, complexity, idiomatic quality, edge cases missed. If their approach is suboptimal, explain the optimal one and, more importantly, the insight that leads to it. Do this review conversationally in chat — this is the interactive, valuable part.
3. Write the entry to areas/dsa/lc-{number}-{kebab-name}.md using templates/leetcode-entry.md. Fill "The mistake to remember" with the single costliest error, phrased as a forward-looking rule ("When the array is sorted and you reach for a hashmap, check two pointers first").
4. Link similar problems. Grep areas/dsa/ for entries sharing the pattern tag; add 2-3 to "Similar problems in vault" bidirectionally.
5. Update indexes/dsa.md, which is organized by pattern, each pattern section listing its problems with a ✅ (clean solve) / ⚠️ (struggled) marker and a running tally. This index is the "which patterns do I fumble" dashboard — keep the tallies accurate.
6. Commit: leetcode: LC 239 sliding-window-maximum (monotonic deque).

Rules

• Be honest in the review; a flattering log is a useless log. But review the code, not the person — concrete and constructive.
• If the user only pastes code, infer the problem from it, confirm your guess, then proceed.
• Repeat attempts at a previously logged problem update the existing entry (append an "Attempt 2" section with date) — this repetition history is exactly what /quiz-me feeds on.