---

name: managing-long-term-investment-policy description: Defines and maintains long-term investment policy guardrails. Use when the user asks for portfolio discipline, rebalancing rules, risk limits, or decision frameworks for multi-year investing.

Managing Long-Term Investment Policy

When to use this skill

• When the user wants a long-horizon investing framework.
• When decisions need consistency across market cycles.
• When emotion-driven decision risk needs guardrails.

Workflow

1. Plan

• Define objective, time horizon, liquidity needs, and risk tolerance.
• Define policy structure before discussing specific securities.

2. Validate

• Confirm constraints are explicit (drawdown tolerance, max position size, diversification rules).
• Confirm assumptions are realistic for the stated horizon.

3. Execute

• Draft a policy checklist and decision rubric.
• Define rebalancing and monitoring cadence.
• Define "do not violate" rules.

Instructions

• Prioritize process quality over short-term prediction.
• Require decision logs for thesis changes.
• Include base rules:
  • Position sizing limits
  • Rebalance bands and cadence
  • Thesis invalidation criteria
  • Maximum leverage or debt exposure constraints
• Force pre-mortem and downside scenarios before large allocation changes.

Policy checklist

• [ ] Time horizon defined
• [ ] Risk budget defined
• [ ] Allocation rules defined
• [ ] Rebalancing rules defined
• [ ] Thesis update protocol defined
• [ ] Behavioral guardrails defined

Output template

## Long-Term Investment Policy

### Objective and Horizon
- Objective: ...
- Horizon: ...

### Risk and Allocation Rules
- Max position size: ...
- Target allocation bands: ...
- Max drawdown tolerance: ...

### Rebalancing Rules
- Cadence: ...
- Trigger bands: ...

### Thesis Governance
- Required evidence to add/increase: ...
- Invalidation triggers: ...
- Exit or reduce rules: ...

Error handling

• If objectives and risk tolerance conflict, stop and request prioritization.
• If user asks for policy-breaking action, flag violation and present compliant alternative.
• If data quality is weak, defer action and state required evidence.

Resources

• valuing-company
• analyzing-macro-regime
• analyzing-business-quality