Project Management Orchestration Patterns

VerifiedSafe

Provides structured patterns for decomposing epics, planning sprints, tracking progress, managing dependencies, and coordinating teams. Helps break down complex projects into manageable tasks using hierarchical decomposition, capacity-based planning, and multi-dimension status reporting.

Sby Skills Guide Bot
ProductivityIntermediate
406/2/2026
Claude Code
#project-management#orchestration#epic-breakdown#sprint-planning#dependency-management

Recommended for

Our review

This skill orchestrates complex project management by breaking epics into hierarchical tasks, planning sprints, and tracking progress across multiple dimensions using parallel agents.

Strengths

  • Clear hierarchical decomposition with phases (explore, plan, fan-out, reduce) managed by agents.
  • Capacity-based sprint planning and dependency management via cc-mirror commands.
  • Multi-dimensional status tracking (tasks, blockers, timeline, quality, risks) for full visibility.

Limitations

  • Relies on the cc-mirror tool specific to Claude Code.
  • Initial setup and agent definitions can be complex.
  • Overkill for small, single-person tasks or simple projects.
When to use it

Use when coordinating a team on a large feature that requires detailed breakdown, parallel work, and dependency tracking.

When not to use it

Avoid for simple tasks with no dependencies or when the project is small enough to manage manually.

Security analysis

Safe
Quality score85/100

The skill describes project management patterns and includes only non-destructive bash commands for a task management CLI (cc-mirror). No execution of arbitrary code, data exfiltration, or system modification is instructed. No security risks are present.

No concerns found

Examples

Epic Breakdown
Break down the authentication epic into user stories and tasks, using hierarchical decomposition.
Sprint Planning
Plan the next sprint for the team, considering current backlog priority, team capacity, and known blockers.
Progress Tracking
What's the current project status? Gather task completion, blockers, timeline variance, quality metrics, and risks.

Project Management Orchestration Patterns

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                             │
│   Complex projects, clearly decomposed.                     │
│   Dependencies tracked. Progress visible. Team aligned.     │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Load when: Epic breakdown, sprint planning, progress tracking, dependency management, team coordination Common patterns: Hierarchical Decomposition, Capacity-Based Planning, Multi-Dimension Status

Table of Contents

  1. Epic Breakdown
  2. Sprint Planning
  3. Progress Tracking
  4. Dependency Management
  5. Team Coordination

Epic Breakdown

Pattern: Hierarchical Decomposition

User Request: "Break down the authentication epic"

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Understand requirements, existing system

Phase 2: PLAN
└─ Plan agent: Design high-level feature breakdown

Phase 3: FAN-OUT (Parallel story creation)
├─ Agent A: User stories for login/logout
├─ Agent B: User stories for registration
├─ Agent C: User stories for password management
├─ Agent D: User stories for session management
└─ Agent E: User stories for OAuth integration

Phase 4: REDUCE
└─ General-purpose agent: Organize into coherent backlog

Task Management Implementation:

# Create epic
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Epic: User Authentication" --description "Complete auth system"

# Create stories
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Story: Login flow" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Story: Registration" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Story: Password reset" --description "..."

# Set dependencies
npx cc-mirror tasks update 3 --add-blocked-by 2

Pattern: Vertical Slice Breakdown

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Map feature touchpoints (UI, API, DB)

Phase 2: FAN-OUT (Slice by user value)
├─ Agent A: Define slice 1 (minimal viable feature)
├─ Agent B: Define slice 2 (enhanced feature)
└─ Agent C: Define slice 3 (complete feature)

Phase 3: PIPELINE
└─ General-purpose agent: Estimate, prioritize, sequence

Sprint Planning

Pattern: Capacity-Based Planning

User Request: "Plan the next sprint"

Phase 1: FAN-OUT (Gather context)
├─ Explore agent: Review backlog priority
├─ Explore agent: Check team capacity
├─ Explore agent: Review blockers and dependencies
└─ Explore agent: Check carryover from last sprint

Phase 2: REDUCE
└─ Plan agent: Propose sprint scope

Phase 3: FAN-OUT (Task breakdown)
├─ Agent A: Break down story 1 into tasks
├─ Agent B: Break down story 2 into tasks
└─ Agent C: Break down story 3 into tasks

Phase 4: PIPELINE
└─ General-purpose agent: Finalize sprint backlog

Task Structure:

# Sprint-level task
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Sprint 14: Auth Implementation" --description "..."

# Stories within sprint
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Login API endpoint" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Login UI component" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks update 3 --add-blocked-by 2

# Sub-tasks
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Write login validation" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Add rate limiting" --description "..."

Progress Tracking

Pattern: Multi-Dimension Status

User Request: "What's the project status?"

Phase 1: FAN-OUT (Parallel status gathering)
├─ Agent A: Task completion status
├─ Agent B: Blocker analysis
├─ Agent C: Timeline vs plan
├─ Agent D: Quality metrics
└─ Agent E: Risk status

Phase 2: REDUCE
└─ General-purpose agent: Executive status summary

Using cc-mirror tasks:

# Get current state
npx cc-mirror tasks --status all

# View dependency graph
npx cc-mirror tasks graph

# Update progress
npx cc-mirror tasks update 5 --add-comment "50% complete, blocked on API review"

# Mark complete
npx cc-mirror tasks update 5 --status resolved

Pattern: Burndown Tracking

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Calculate completed vs remaining work

Phase 2: PIPELINE
├─ General-purpose agent: Project completion trajectory
├─ General-purpose agent: Identify velocity trends
└─ General-purpose agent: Flag at-risk items

Phase 3: REDUCE
└─ General-purpose agent: Burndown report

Dependency Management

Pattern: Dependency Graph Construction

User Request: "Map project dependencies"

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: List all tasks and their relationships

Phase 2: FAN-OUT
├─ Agent A: Map technical dependencies
├─ Agent B: Map team/resource dependencies
└─ Agent C: Map external dependencies

Phase 3: REDUCE
└─ General-purpose agent: Dependency graph, critical path

Implementation:

# Create dependency chain
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Database schema" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "API models" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "API endpoints" --description "..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Frontend integration" --description "..."

npx cc-mirror tasks update 2 --add-blocked-by 1
npx cc-mirror tasks update 3 --add-blocked-by 2
npx cc-mirror tasks update 4 --add-blocked-by 3

# Cross-team dependency
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "External API access" --description "Waiting on partner"
npx cc-mirror tasks update 3 --add-blocked-by 5

# Visualize
npx cc-mirror tasks graph

Pattern: Critical Path Analysis

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Map all task dependencies

Phase 2: PIPELINE
├─ General-purpose agent: Calculate path lengths
├─ General-purpose agent: Identify critical path
└─ General-purpose agent: Find parallel opportunities

Phase 3: REDUCE
└─ General-purpose agent: Optimization recommendations

Team Coordination

Pattern: Work Distribution

User Request: "Assign work for this sprint"

Phase 1: FAN-OUT
├─ Explore agent: Analyze task requirements
├─ Explore agent: Review team skills/capacity
└─ Explore agent: Check current assignments

Phase 2: REDUCE
└─ Plan agent: Optimal assignment recommendations

Phase 3: FAN-OUT (Parallel task assignment)
├─ Agent A: Create task assignments for dev 1
├─ Agent B: Create task assignments for dev 2
└─ Agent C: Create task assignments for dev 3

Pattern: Multi-Team Sync

Phase 1: FAN-OUT
├─ Agent A: Gather Team A status
├─ Agent B: Gather Team B status
└─ Agent C: Identify cross-team dependencies

Phase 2: REDUCE
└─ General-purpose agent: Cross-team status, blockers, needs

Task Management in Practice

All project management work should use cc-mirror tasks for proper tracking:

# Sprint planning example
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Sprint 14 Planning" --description "Plan next sprint scope..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Review backlog" --description "Prioritize stories..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Break down Story A" --description "Create implementation tasks..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Break down Story B" --description "Create implementation tasks..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Set dependencies" --description "Wire task dependencies..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Assign work" --description "Distribute to team..."

# Planning sequence
npx cc-mirror tasks update 2 --add-blocked-by 1
npx cc-mirror tasks update 3 --add-blocked-by 2
npx cc-mirror tasks update 4 --add-blocked-by 2
npx cc-mirror tasks update 5 --add-blocked-by 3,4
npx cc-mirror tasks update 6 --add-blocked-by 5
# Track in session
TodoWrite([
    {"content": "Sprint 14 Planning", "status": "in_progress", "activeForm": "Planning Sprint 14"},
    {"content": "Review backlog", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Reviewing backlog"},
    {"content": "Break down Story A", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Breaking down Story A"},
    {"content": "Break down Story B", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Breaking down Story B"},
    {"content": "Set dependencies", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Setting dependencies"},
    {"content": "Assign work", "status": "pending", "activeForm": "Assigning work"}
])

# Parallel breakdown (sonnet for structured planning work)
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="Task 3: Break down Story A...",
     model="sonnet", run_in_background=True)
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="Task 4: Break down Story B...",
     model="sonnet", run_in_background=True)

Best Practices

  1. Break down early - Large tasks are hard to track
  2. Set dependencies explicitly - Prevents blocked work
  3. Update status frequently - Real-time visibility
  4. Comment on blockers - Context for resolution
  5. Close completed tasks immediately - Accurate progress

─── ◈ Project Management ────────────────
Related skills