Automated summary
Runs a roborev code review on a commit (or HEAD) through bash commands, waits for completion, then presents the verdict and findings to the user.
Strengths
- Verifies the commit reference with git rev-parse before invoking the review, preventing invalid refs from reaching roborev
- The --wait flag blocks until the review finishes, so results are always complete when presented
- Supports multi-reviewer panels (--panel) by surfacing the synthesis verdict and pointing fixes at the parent job
- Lists findings grouped by severity with file paths and line numbers the user can navigate to directly
Limitations
- Only activates on explicit invocation (/roborev-review or structured skill selection); a natural-language request like "review this commit" will not trigger it
- Requires a running roborev daemon and an initialized repo (roborev init), otherwise the command errors out
- Depends on bash execution, so it needs a shell-enabled environment with the roborev binary installed
- --wait is blocking and can tie up the session on large reviews
Use it when you want a formal roborev review of a specific commit or of HEAD, with a clear verdict and detailed findings.
Avoid it when the user is pasting existing review output or just wants an informal opinion without explicitly invoking the command.
Security analysis
CautionThe skill is designed to run bash commands (`roborev review`, `git rev-parse`) and block on `--wait`. These are legitimate, non-destructive operations scoped to code review, with commit refs validated through `git rev-parse --verify` inside a quoted heredoc, which limits shell-injection risk. No exfiltration, obfuscation, or destructive commands; the only meaningful risk is reliance on an external tool that themselves should be trusted, hence 'caution' rather than 'safe'.
- •Requires executing external `roborev` CLI via bash and reads git state (`git rev-parse`)
- •Passes user-supplied commit ref into shell command, though via quoted heredoc + `git rev-parse --verify` validation which mitigates injection
Examples
/roborev-review/roborev-review 3f2a1c9 --type security/roborev-review HEAD~1 --panel defaultname: roborev-review description: Use only when the user explicitly invokes /roborev-review disable-model-invocation: true
roborev-review
Request a code review for a commit and present the results.
Usage
/roborev-review [commit] [--type security|design] [--panel <name>|none]
Explicit invocation only
Invocation must be explicit: literal personal /roborev-review, or structured
Grok Build skill selection.
Requests such as “review this commit” without one of these explicit mechanisms must use native
behavior and must not run roborev.
When NOT to invoke this skill
Do NOT invoke this skill when the user is presenting or pasting existing review results. Messages that contain review findings, verdicts, or summaries are outputs — not requests to start a new review.
IMPORTANT
This skill requires you to execute bash commands to validate the commit and run the review. The task is not complete until the review finishes and you present the results to the user.
These instructions are guidelines, not a rigid script. Use the conversation context. Skip steps that are already satisfied. Defer to project-level AGENTS.md instructions when they conflict with these steps.
Instructions
When the user invokes /roborev-review [commit] [--type security|design] [--panel <name>|none]:
1. Validate inputs
If a commit ref is provided, use the commit-provided command snippet below; it stores and validates the ref before invoking roborev review.
If validation fails, inform the user the ref is invalid. Do not proceed.
2. Build and run the command
Construct and execute the review command:
If no commit is specified, run:
roborev review --wait [--type <type>] [--panel <name>|none]
If a commit is specified, run:
read -r commit <<'ROBOREV_REF'
<commit>
ROBOREV_REF
git rev-parse --verify -- "$commit^{commit}" || exit 1
roborev review "$commit" --wait [--type <type>] [--panel <name>|none]
- If
--typeis specified, include it - If
--panel <name>is specified, include it (fans out to the named config panel);--panel noneforces a single-agent review
The --wait flag blocks until the review completes.
3. Present the results
If the command output contains an error (e.g., daemon not running, repo not initialized, review errored), report it to the user. Suggest roborev status to check the daemon, roborev init if the repo is not initialized, or re-running the review.
Otherwise, present the review to the user:
- Show the verdict prominently (Pass or Fail)
- If there are findings, list them grouped by severity with file paths and line numbers so the user can navigate directly
- If the review passed, a brief confirmation is sufficient
Panels (multi-reviewer reviews)
If you pass --panel <name>, or a default_panel is configured for explicit
reviews, the review fans out to a panel of reviewers. In that case the
Enqueued job <id> is the synthesis (parent) job that aggregates them, and
its verdict and findings are the synthesized result across the whole panel.
Present that synthesized verdict/findings, and offer fix on that parent id —
never an individual reviewer. roborev show prints a one-line reviewers summary
(e.g. 3 reviewers: bug P, security F) for a synthesis job. --panel none
forces a single-agent review, and automatic post-commit hook reviews stay
single-agent regardless of default_panel.
4. Offer next steps
If the review has findings (verdict is Fail), offer to address them:
- "Would you like me to fix these findings? You can run
/roborev-fix <job_id>"
Extract the job ID from the review output to include in the suggestion. Look for it in the Enqueued job <id> for ... line or in the review header. For a panel review this id is the synthesis parent.
If the review passed, confirm the result and do not offer /roborev-fix.
Examples
Default review of HEAD:
User: /roborev-review
Agent:
- Executes
roborev review --wait - Presents the verdict and findings grouped by severity
- If findings exist: "Would you like me to address these findings? Run
/roborev-fix 1042" - If passed: "Review passed with no findings."
Security review of a specific commit:
User: /roborev-review abc123 --type security
Agent:
- Validates:
git rev-parse --verify -- "abc123^{commit}" - Executes
roborev review abc123 --wait --type security - Presents the verdict and findings
- If findings exist: "Would you like me to address these findings? Run
/roborev-fix 1043"
See also
/roborev-design-review— shorthand for/roborev-review --type design/roborev-fix— fix a review's findings in code/roborev-review-branch— review all commits on the current branch
From the file to a first result
The download contains exactly the content displayed on this page. This copy may differ from the latest version in the source repository.
View the source and supporting filesThis download contains SKILL.md only. Any scripts, references, templates and dependencies are not included. Get the required files from the source, preserving their directory structure, before continuing.
1. Download the file
Download SKILL.mdFrom the root of a test project, save the file as .skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/SKILL.md, or use the command below. This folder is for inspecting the skill before installation.
Command for macOS/Linux or WSL: requires a POSIX shell and curl. On Windows without WSL, use the download button and create the folder manually.
mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/download' --output '.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/SKILL.md'2. Check prerequisites
Read SKILL.md before using it. If it references scripts or external services, inspect them and prepare the required access in your test environment.
No recognized prerequisites section in this file. This does not mean it is self-contained: libraries, tools and access requirements may be mentioned elsewhere in the content or source repository.
The platforms on this page are catalog indications. The paths below follow tool documentation; they do not prove this skill has been run in those tools. No minimum tool version is confirmed for this listing.
3. Load the skill
After inspection, copy the complete folder into your project using one of the commands below, then open a new tool session. The command stops if a folder with the same name already exists: compare the files before replacing it.
Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/roborev-review' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8' '.claude/skills/roborev-review'OpenSkills
OpenSkills must already be installed. The local install/read procedure is checked with OpenSkills 1.5.0, which requires Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Catalog slugs are not resolved automatically.
Official OpenSkills installationopenskills install './.skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8'openskills read 'roborev-code-review-msh3uta8'Reading should display the installed file content and its base directory. It does not run the skill or install its dependencies.
For an agent that reads AGENTS.md, then sync the index. This command changes AGENTS.md: review the diff before using it.
openskills syncManual method or another tool: attach SKILL.md to a conversation, or open it in an agent that can read files. Include any required supporting resources. No universal folder is recognized by every tool.
4. Try a first task
Use a short, synthetic input: an API endpoint, a small document or an interface brief. In a new conversation, attach the file or give the agent its path, then adapt this request:
Read .skill-downloads/roborev-code-review-msh3uta8/SKILL.md and apply its instructions to this example: [describe a test input]. Identify any missing files, dependencies or access. Produce the result requested by the skill without inventing data or running unreviewed scripts.Expected result: output matching the skill instructions, or a precise list of missing prerequisites. A read confirmation alone does not validate a first use. If an external resource is unavailable, that path remains untested.
React Hook Form Best Practices
Development
Master React Hook Form: avoid anti-patterns, manage subscriptions, and handle reset, dirty state, and controlled inputs correctly.
Emotion to Mantine Migration
Development
Migrate Emotion styled-components to Mantine components with style props and CSS modules. Use when converting .styled.tsx files or removing @emotion imports.
Scope Creep Detector
Development
Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad PRs, and oversized changes, then suggests keep, split, or justify actions.