---

name: resilience-classify description: Research and classify stablecoins for resilience sub-factor overrides (chainRisk, collateralQuality, custodyModel). Run after types/defaults are implemented to identify coins needing explicit overrides.

Resilience Classification Skill

Identify stablecoins where the default inference (from backing + governance) is incorrect and apply overrides.

When to Invoke

• After the resilience types and default inference are implemented
• When a new stablecoin is added to the tracker
• When auditing resilience scores for accuracy

Process

Step 1 — Identify candidates

Read all coins from src/lib/stablecoins.ts. For each, apply the default inference rules (see inferResilienceDefaults() in src/lib/report-cards.ts). Flag coins where the default is likely wrong based on:

• collateral text containing keywords: "Solana", "tBTC", "WBTC", "delta-neutral", "perpetual", "CEX", "off-exchange", "Copper", "Ceffu", "Fireblocks", "bridged"
• pegMechanism text containing: "Solana", "Bitcoin L2", "not Ethereum", "Tron"
• contracts[] listing only non-Ethereum chains
• backing = crypto-backed but collateral text mentions RWAs, bridges, or exotic strategies
• Coins on this known-override list: HYUSD, USDe, meUSD, USDD, sUSD (Synthetix), USDJ

Step 2 — Research each candidate

For each flagged coin, in parallel:

• WebFetch official docs for collateral composition, custody arrangement, and chain architecture
• WebSearch for "{coin name}" stablecoin collateral custody chain to find independent analysis
• Cross-reference with existing collateral and pegMechanism text fields

Step 3 — Classify

For each coin, determine the correct tier:

| Sub-factor | Question | Tiers | |---|---|---| | chainRisk | Where does the core protocol live and where is collateral held? | ethereum (100), stage1-l2 (66), established-alt-l1 (33), unproven (0) | | collateralQuality | What are the trust assumptions in backing assets? | native (100), eth-lst (66), alt-lst-bridged-or-mixed (33), exotic (0) | | custodyModel | Who holds the collateral and can it be verified on-chain? | onchain (100), institutional (50), cex (0) |

Classification rules:

• chainRisk: Based on where the protocol's smart contracts and collateral vaults live, NOT where the token is bridged to
• collateralQuality: For mixed collateral, use the tier of the riskiest significant component (>15% of backing). Stablecoin portions don't count here (handled by dependency risk)
• custodyModel: If ANY significant portion is held off-chain by a non-institutional custodian, classify as cex
• When uncertain between two tiers, choose the riskier (lower score) tier

Step 4 — Present findings

For each coin needing an override, present:

## {Name} ({Symbol}) — ID: {id}

### Default inference
- chainRisk: {inferred} — {correct/wrong because...}
- collateralQuality: {inferred} — {correct/wrong because...}
- custodyModel: {inferred} — {correct/wrong because...}

### Proposed overrides
- {field}: {value} — {justification with source URL}

### No override needed
- {fields where default is correct}

Step 5 — Apply

After user approval, edit src/lib/stablecoins.ts to add only the override fields that differ from defaults. Example:

usd("123", "Example", "EX", "crypto-backed", "decentralized", {
  // ... existing fields ...
  chainRisk: "established-alt-l1",
  collateralQuality: "alt-lst-bridged",
}),

Run npm run build to verify.