Our review
Provides a structured debugging workflow using the scientific method, with session persistence and subagent isolation to manage context consumption.
Strengths
- Systematic root cause analysis through the scientific method.
- Subagent isolation preserves the main context for user interaction.
- Checkpoint and continuation support for long-running investigations.
- Complete traceability of hypotheses and tests.
Limitations
- Requires subagent infrastructure (specific to Claude Code).
- Overhead from spawning multiple agents.
- Not suitable for trivial or quick-to-fix issues.
Use when debugging complex issues that require systematic investigation and may consume significant context.
Avoid for simple bugs that can be fixed directly without extensive analysis.
Security analysis
SafeThe skill defines a debugging workflow using non-destructive Bash commands (ls for file listing), spawning subagents for investigation, and gathering user symptoms. No harmful operations like network exfiltration, destructive filesystem commands, or disabling safety are instructed.
No concerns found
Examples
gsd-debug My API endpoint /users returns 500 error intermittentlygsd-debug Memory increases steadily over time in production, never dropsgsd-debug Webpack build fails with 'Module not found' error only on CIname: gsd-debug description: Structured debugging workflow with session persistence and investigation tracking allowed-tools: Task, Read, Edit, Bash argument-hint: [issue]
<objective> Debug issues using scientific method with subagent isolation.Orchestrator role: Gather symptoms, spawn gsd-debugger agent, handle checkpoints, spawn continuations.
Why subagent: Investigation burns context fast (reading files, forming hypotheses, testing). Fresh 200k context per investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction. </objective>
<context> User's issue: $ARGUMENTSCheck for active sessions:
ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved | head -5
</context>
<process>
1. Check Active Sessions
If active sessions exist AND no $ARGUMENTS:
- List sessions with status, hypothesis, next action
- User picks number to resume OR describes new issue
If $ARGUMENTS provided OR user describes new issue:
- Continue to symptom gathering
2. Gather Symptoms (if new issue)
Use AskUserQuestion for each:
- Expected behavior - What should happen?
- Actual behavior - What happens instead?
- Error messages - Any errors? (paste or describe)
- Timeline - When did this start? Ever worked?
- Reproduction - How do you trigger it?
After all gathered, confirm ready to investigate.
3. Spawn gsd-debugger Agent
Fill prompt and spawn:
<objective>
Investigate issue: {slug}
**Summary:** {trigger}
</objective>
<symptoms>
expected: {expected}
actual: {actual}
errors: {errors}
reproduction: {reproduction}
timeline: {timeline}
</symptoms>
<mode>
symptoms_prefilled: true
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
<debug_file>
Create: .planning/debug/{slug}.md
</debug_file>
Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Debug {slug}"
)
4. Handle Agent Return
If ## ROOT CAUSE FOUND:
- Display root cause and evidence summary
- Offer options:
- "Fix now" - spawn fix subagent
- "Plan fix" - suggest {{COMMAND_PREFIX}}plan-phase --gaps
- "Manual fix" - done
If ## CHECKPOINT REACHED:
- Present checkpoint details to user
- Get user response
- Spawn continuation agent (see step 5)
If ## INVESTIGATION INCONCLUSIVE:
- Show what was checked and eliminated
- Offer options:
- "Continue investigating" - spawn new agent with additional context
- "Manual investigation" - done
- "Add more context" - gather more symptoms, spawn again
5. Spawn Continuation Agent (After Checkpoint)
When user responds to checkpoint, spawn fresh agent:
<objective>
Continue debugging {slug}. Evidence is in the debug file.
</objective>
<prior_state>
Debug file: @.planning/debug/{slug}.md
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>
<mode>
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Continue debug {slug}"
)
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Active sessions checked
- [ ] Symptoms gathered (if new)
- [ ] gsd-debugger spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] Root cause confirmed before fixing </success_criteria>
Next.js App Router Expert
Development
A skill that turns Claude into a Next.js App Router expert.
README Generator
Development
Creates professional and comprehensive README.md files for your projects.
API Documentation Writer
Development
Generates comprehensive API documentation in OpenAPI/Swagger format.