Structured debugging workflow with session persistence
Scientific debugging workflow using isolated subagents to manage context efficiently. Handles active sessions, symptom gathering, and investigation tracking.
name: gsd-debug description: Structured debugging workflow with session persistence and investigation tracking allowed-tools: Task, Read, Edit, Bash argument-hint: [issue]
<objective> Debug issues using scientific method with subagent isolation.Orchestrator role: Gather symptoms, spawn gsd-debugger agent, handle checkpoints, spawn continuations.
Why subagent: Investigation burns context fast (reading files, forming hypotheses, testing). Fresh 200k context per investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction. </objective>
<context> User's issue: $ARGUMENTSCheck for active sessions:
ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved | head -5
</context>
<process>
1. Check Active Sessions
If active sessions exist AND no $ARGUMENTS:
- List sessions with status, hypothesis, next action
- User picks number to resume OR describes new issue
If $ARGUMENTS provided OR user describes new issue:
- Continue to symptom gathering
2. Gather Symptoms (if new issue)
Use AskUserQuestion for each:
- Expected behavior - What should happen?
- Actual behavior - What happens instead?
- Error messages - Any errors? (paste or describe)
- Timeline - When did this start? Ever worked?
- Reproduction - How do you trigger it?
After all gathered, confirm ready to investigate.
3. Spawn gsd-debugger Agent
Fill prompt and spawn:
<objective>
Investigate issue: {slug}
**Summary:** {trigger}
</objective>
<symptoms>
expected: {expected}
actual: {actual}
errors: {errors}
reproduction: {reproduction}
timeline: {timeline}
</symptoms>
<mode>
symptoms_prefilled: true
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
<debug_file>
Create: .planning/debug/{slug}.md
</debug_file>
Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Debug {slug}"
)
4. Handle Agent Return
If ## ROOT CAUSE FOUND:
- Display root cause and evidence summary
- Offer options:
- "Fix now" - spawn fix subagent
- "Plan fix" - suggest {{COMMAND_PREFIX}}plan-phase --gaps
- "Manual fix" - done
If ## CHECKPOINT REACHED:
- Present checkpoint details to user
- Get user response
- Spawn continuation agent (see step 5)
If ## INVESTIGATION INCONCLUSIVE:
- Show what was checked and eliminated
- Offer options:
- "Continue investigating" - spawn new agent with additional context
- "Manual investigation" - done
- "Add more context" - gather more symptoms, spawn again
5. Spawn Continuation Agent (After Checkpoint)
When user responds to checkpoint, spawn fresh agent:
<objective>
Continue debugging {slug}. Evidence is in the debug file.
</objective>
<prior_state>
Debug file: @.planning/debug/{slug}.md
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>
<mode>
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Continue debug {slug}"
)
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Active sessions checked
- [ ] Symptoms gathered (if new)
- [ ] gsd-debugger spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] Root cause confirmed before fixing </success_criteria>
Related skills
Docker Compose Architect
Designs optimized Docker Compose configurations.
Incident Postmortem Writer
Writes structured and blameless incident postmortem reports.
Runbook Creator
Creates clear operational runbooks for common DevOps procedures.