Automated summary
Guides an AI coding agent through a three-phase thorough workflow—analysis, systematic implementation, and verification—for complex multi-step tasks.
Strengths
- Breaks work into explicit analysis, implementation, and verification phases with time budgets.
- Includes concrete anti-patterns and quality checkpoints to prevent shortcut-driven fixes.
- Provides a worked bad-vs-good example for resolving many TypeScript errors.
- Prioritizes root-cause analysis and dependency-ordered fixes.
Limitations
- Offers methodology only—no commands, tool integrations, or automated checks.
- Depends on the agent consistently self-enforcing the phases; there is no enforcement mechanism.
- Deliberately slower up front (2–3x), so it is overkill for small or time-critical changes.
Use when fixing critical bugs, resolving many compilation or test failures, or implementing complex multi-step features where completeness matters more than speed.
Avoid for trivial one-line fixes, early prototypes, or urgent hotfixes where speed is the priority.
Security analysis
SafeThis skill is a pure methodology/instruction file for systematic software work. It declares no tools and contains no commands, network access, credential handling, destructive operations, obfuscated payloads, or safety-disabling instructions.
No concerns found
How this analysis is madeExamples
I have 24 TypeScript errors after a dependency upgrade. Work through them thoroughly: list and group the errors, find root causes, fix them in dependency order, and run tests after each category.These integration tests started failing after my refactor. Debug them thoroughly—trace each failure to its root cause, fix one issue at a time, and verify with the full test suite before declaring done.Implement this multi-step feature carefully: create a detailed plan, implement each atomic step, verify each change with tests, and document any limitations at the end.name: thoroughness description: Use when implementing complex multi-step tasks, fixing critical bugs, or when quality and completeness matter more than speed - ensures comprehensive implementation without shortcuts through systematic analysis, implementation, and verification phases
Thoroughness
Purpose
This skill ensures comprehensive, complete implementation of complex tasks without shortcuts. Use this when quality and completeness matter more than speed.
When to Use
- Fixing critical bugs or compilation errors
- Implementing complex multi-step features
- Debugging test failures
- Refactoring large codebases
- Production deployments
- Any task where shortcuts could cause future problems
Methodology
Phase 1: Comprehensive Analysis (20% of time)
-
Identify All Issues
- List every error, warning, and failing test
- Group related issues together
- Prioritize by dependency order
- Create issue hierarchy (what blocks what)
-
Root Cause Analysis
- Don't fix symptoms, find root causes
- Trace errors to their source
- Identify patterns in failures
- Document assumptions that were wrong
-
Create Detailed Plan
- Break down into atomic steps
- Estimate time for each step
- Identify dependencies between steps
- Plan verification for each step
- Schedule breaks/checkpoints
Phase 2: Systematic Implementation (60% of time)
-
Fix Issues in Dependency Order
- Start with foundational issues
- Fix one thing completely before moving on
- Test after each fix
- Document what was changed and why
-
Verify Each Fix
- Write/run tests for the specific fix
- Check for side effects
- Verify related functionality still works
- Document test results
-
Track Progress
- Mark issues as completed
- Update plan with new discoveries
- Adjust time estimates
- Note any blockers immediately
Phase 3: Comprehensive Verification (20% of time)
-
Run All Tests
- Unit tests
- Integration tests
- E2E tests
- Manual verification
-
Cross-Check Everything
- Review all changed files
- Verify compilation succeeds
- Check for console errors/warnings
- Test edge cases
-
Documentation
- Update relevant docs
- Add inline comments for complex fixes
- Document known limitations
- Create issues for future work
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
- ❌ Fixing multiple unrelated issues at once
- ❌ Moving on before verifying a fix works
- ❌ Assuming similar errors have the same cause
- ❌ Skipping test writing "to save time"
- ❌ Copy-pasting solutions without understanding
- ❌ Ignoring warnings "because it compiles"
- ❌ Making changes without reading existing code first
Quality Checkpoints
- [ ] Can I explain why this fix works?
- [ ] Have I tested this specific change?
- [ ] Are there any side effects?
- [ ] Is this the root cause or a symptom?
- [ ] Will this prevent similar issues in the future?
- [ ] Is the code readable and maintainable?
- [ ] Have I documented non-obvious decisions?
Example Workflow
Bad Approach (Shortcut-Driven)
1. See 24 TypeScript errors
2. Add @ts-ignore to all of them
3. Hope tests pass
4. Move on
Good Approach (Thoroughness-Driven)
1. List all 24 errors systematically
2. Group by error type (7 missing types, 10 unknown casts, 7 property access)
3. Find root causes:
- Missing @types/tar package
- No type assertions on fetch responses
- Implicit any types in callbacks
4. Fix by category:
- Install @types/tar (fixes 7 errors)
- Add proper type assertions to registry-client.ts (fixes 10 errors)
- Add explicit parameter types (fixes 7 errors)
5. Test after each category
6. Run full test suite
7. Document what was learned
Time Investment
- Initial: 2-3x slower than shortcuts
- Long-term: 10x faster (no debugging later, no rework)
- Quality: Near-perfect first time
- Maintenance: Minimal
Success Metrics
- ✅ 100% of tests passing
- ✅ Zero warnings in production build
- ✅ All code has test coverage
- ✅ Documentation is complete and accurate
- ✅ No known issues or TODOs left behind
- ✅ Future developers can understand the code
Mantras
- "Slow is smooth, smooth is fast"
- "Do it right the first time"
- "Test everything, assume nothing"
- "Document for your future self"
- "Root causes, not symptoms"
From the file to a first result
The download contains exactly the content displayed on this page. This copy may differ from the latest version in the source repository.
View the source and supporting filesThis download contains SKILL.md only. Any scripts, references, templates and dependencies are not included. Get the required files from the source, preserving their directory structure, before continuing.
1. Download the file
Download SKILL.mdFrom the root of a test project, save the file as .skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md, or use the command below. This folder is for inspecting the skill before installation.
Command for macOS/Linux or WSL: requires a POSIX shell and curl. On Windows without WSL, use the download button and create the folder manually.
mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/download' --output '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md'2. Check prerequisites
Read SKILL.md before using it. If it references scripts or external services, inspect them and prepare the required access in your test environment.
No recognized prerequisites section in this file. This does not mean it is self-contained: libraries, tools and access requirements may be mentioned elsewhere in the content or source repository.
The platforms on this page are catalog indications. The paths below follow tool documentation; they do not prove this skill has been run in those tools. No minimum tool version is confirmed for this listing.
3. Load the skill
After inspection, copy the complete folder into your project using one of the commands below, then open a new tool session. The command stops if a folder with the same name already exists: compare the files before replacing it.
Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/thoroughness' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra' '.claude/skills/thoroughness'Cursor
test -f '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.cursor/skills' && test ! -e '.cursor/skills/thoroughness' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra' '.cursor/skills/thoroughness'Codex
test -f '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.agents/skills' && test ! -e '.agents/skills/thoroughness' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra' '.agents/skills/thoroughness'OpenSkills
OpenSkills must already be installed. The local install/read procedure is checked with OpenSkills 1.5.0, which requires Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Catalog slugs are not resolved automatically.
Official OpenSkills installationopenskills install './.skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra'openskills read 'thoroughness-mm5t89ra'Reading should display the installed file content and its base directory. It does not run the skill or install its dependencies.
For an agent that reads AGENTS.md, then sync the index. This command changes AGENTS.md: review the diff before using it.
openskills syncManual method or another tool: attach SKILL.md to a conversation, or open it in an agent that can read files. Include any required supporting resources. No universal folder is recognized by every tool.
4. Try a first task
Use a short, synthetic input: an API endpoint, a small document or an interface brief. In a new conversation, attach the file or give the agent its path, then adapt this request:
Read .skill-downloads/thoroughness-mm5t89ra/SKILL.md and apply its instructions to this example: [describe a test input]. Identify any missing files, dependencies or access. Produce the result requested by the skill without inventing data or running unreviewed scripts.Expected result: output matching the skill instructions, or a precise list of missing prerequisites. A read confirmation alone does not validate a first use. If an external resource is unavailable, that path remains untested.
React Hook Form Best Practices
Development
Master React Hook Form: avoid anti-patterns, manage subscriptions, and handle reset, dirty state, and controlled inputs correctly.
Emotion to Mantine Migration
Development
Migrate Emotion styled-components to Mantine components with style props and CSS modules. Use when converting .styled.tsx files or removing @emotion imports.
Scope Creep Detector
Development
Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad PRs, and oversized changes, then suggests keep, split, or justify actions.