Documentation Ark avec Diataxis

VérifiéSûr

Ce skill guide la structuration de la documentation Ark selon le framework Diataxis (Tutoriels, Guides pratiques, Concepts fondamentaux, Référence). Il aide à décider où placer chaque contenu, à réviser les PR de documentation et à restructurer une documentation existante. Idéal pour créer des docs cohérentes adaptées aux besoins des développeurs, contributeurs et opérateurs.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DocumentationIntermédiaire
17002/06/2026
Claude Code
#documentation#diataxis#ark#writing#structuring

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Fournit des conseils pour structurer la documentation d'Ark en utilisant le framework Diataxis afin de classer le contenu en tutoriels, guides pratiques, concepts fondamentaux et référence.

Points forts

  • Quadrants clairement définis avec des objectifs distincts
  • Organisation par persona pour les guides pratiques
  • Guide de décision simple pour choisir la bonne section
  • Pages hub facilitant la navigation

Limites

  • Spécifique au projet Ark, nécessite adaptation pour d'autres projets
  • Peut être trop rigide pour des documentations très petites
  • Nécessite une discipline d'équipe pour maintenir la structure
Quand l'utiliser

Utilisez ce skill lors de la création ou de la restructuration de la documentation d'Ark ou de projets techniques similaires.

Quand l'éviter

Évitez de l'utiliser pour des documentations très simples ou lorsque vous n'avez pas besoin d'une catégorisation formelle du contenu.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité95/100

This skill file contains only documentation structure guidelines with no executable instructions, network calls, or destructive actions. It poses no security risk.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Exemples

Restructure documentation
I'm rewriting our project's documentation. Can you help me apply the Diataxis framework to categorize our existing content into tutorials, how-to guides, core concepts, and reference?
Review documentation PR
I have a pull request adding a new page about deployment to our docs. Should it be a how-to guide or reference? Use the Diataxis framework to decide.
Create new documentation from scratch
We're starting a new open-source project and need to create its documentation. I want it structured using Diataxis like Ark's docs. Can you outline the sections and suggest what goes where?

name: ark-documentation description: Guidance for structuring Ark documentation using the Diataxis framework. Use this skill when creating new docs, deciding where content belongs, reviewing documentation PRs, or restructuring existing documentation.

Ark Documentation

Guidance for structuring Ark documentation using Diataxis adapted for Ark's needs.

When to use this skill

  • Creating new documentation
  • Deciding where content belongs
  • Reviewing documentation PRs
  • Restructuring existing documentation

ARK's Diataxis structure

docs/content/
├── Introduction
├── Quickstart
├── Tutorials          → Linear learning paths
├── How-to Guides      → Task-oriented, by persona
├── Core Concepts      → Understanding "why" and "how"
├── Reference          → Factual lookup material
├── Marketplace        → External link
└── Disclaimer

Terminology

| Diataxis | Ark Term | Why | |----------|----------|-----| | Explanation | Core Concepts | More accessible |

The four quadrants

1. Tutorials (learning-oriented)

Purpose: Hands-on lessons for newcomers.

Characteristics:

  • Linear, numbered paths (1, 2, 3...)
  • Single prescribed path - no choices
  • Frequent visible results
  • Ends with "Next step" → How-to Guides

Writing style:

  • Use "we" language
  • Don't explain - link to Core Concepts

Content belongs here if:

  • It teaches a skill through doing
  • Reader is studying, not working
  • Success requires following steps in order

Examples: Quickstart, Running the Dashboard, Starting a New Project, Complete Worked Example


2. How-to guides (task-oriented)

Purpose: Help competent users complete specific tasks.

Organized by persona:

Build with ARK (application developers)

  • Configure models, create agents, coordinate teams, run queries, add tools.

Extend ARK (contributors)

  • Build services locally, implement APIs, build A2A servers, add tests.

Operate ARK (operators / SRE / security)

  • Platform operations: Provisioning, deploying
  • CI/CD and supply chain: Build pipelines
  • Security & assurance: Pen testing, code analysis

Writing style:

  • Goal-oriented: "If you want X, do Y"
  • Assumes competence
  • Don't teach - link to Tutorials or Core Concepts

Content belongs here if:

  • Reader has a specific task to complete
  • Reader is working, not studying

3. Core concepts (understanding-oriented)

Purpose: Explain what ARK is, how it's designed, and why.

Topics:

  • What ARK is and how it works.
  • Design effective agentic systems.
  • Platform architecture concepts.
  • Extensibility concepts.
  • Security and identity concepts.

Writing style:

  • Discursive: "The reason for X is..."
  • Make connections between concepts
  • Provide design decision context

Content belongs here if:

  • It answers "why" or "how does this work"
  • Reader is deciding how to design/extend/operate
  • Content provides context, not procedures

4. Reference (information-oriented)

Purpose: Factual lookup material.

Organized by type:

  • Interfaces: ARK APIs.
  • Kubernetes API: CRDs, resources.
  • Evaluations: Guides, event-based evaluations.
  • System behavior: Query execution, relationships.
  • Operations: Upgrading, troubleshooting.
  • Project: Contributors.

Writing style:

  • Austere, factual, neutral
  • Structure mirrors product
  • No instruction, explanation, or opinion

Content belongs here if:

  • It describes what something IS
  • Reader needs to look up specific details
  • Content is consulted, not read cover-to-cover

Decision guide

Is the reader LEARNING or WORKING?
│
├─ LEARNING (studying)
│   ├─ Hands-on, step-by-step? → TUTORIALS
│   └─ Understanding concepts? → CORE CONCEPTS
│
└─ WORKING (applying)
    ├─ Completing a task? → HOW-TO GUIDES
    └─ Looking up facts? → REFERENCE

Hub pages

Hub pages link to content without moving files:

  • tutorials.mdx - Lists tutorials in order.
  • how-to-guides.mdx - Groups by persona.
  • core-concepts.mdx - Groups by topic.
  • reference/index.mdx - Groups by type.

Hub pages should:

  • Explain purpose in one sentence.
  • Group links logically.
  • Not duplicate content.

Personas

| Persona | Sections | |---------|----------| | End users | Quickstart, Tutorials | | Agent builders | Tutorials, How-to (Build) | | Platform engineers | How-to (Operate), Reference | | Contributors | How-to (Extend), Core Concepts |

Writing guidelines

Lexicon

  • The product is known as ARK rather than Ark.

General style

  • Be concise and direct.
  • Use simple language.
  • Keep descriptions to 1-2 sentences.
  • Use active voice: "Creates agent" not "Agent is created".
  • Write "ARK" not "Ark".
  • Use US English.
  • Use Oxford commas in lists.

Bullets

  • Capitalize the first word and end with a period.
  • Use numbered lists only for sequences of instructions or when referencing items later.

Capitalization

  • Capitalize only proper nouns (product names, tools, services).
  • Use sentence case for titles: "An introduction to data visualization" not "An Introduction to Data Visualization".
  • Don't capitalize: cloud, internet, machine learning, advanced analytics.

Headings

  • Avoid gerunds: "Get started" not "Getting started," "Customize a layout" not "Customizing a layout".
  • Keep titles short and descriptive for search discoverability.

Instructions

  • Use imperatives: "Complete the configuration steps".
  • Don't use "please".
  • Don't use passive tense: "Complete the steps" not "The steps should be completed".

Links

  • Make hyperlinks descriptive: Learn how to [contribute to ARK](url).
  • Don't write: To contribute, see [here](url).

Avoid

  • Gerunds in headings.
  • Colloquialisms (may not translate across regions/languages).
  • Business speak: "leverage", "utilize", "facilitate".

What not to mix

| Don't put in... | This content... | |-----------------|-----------------| | Tutorials | Explanations, choices. | | How-to guides | Teaching, complete reference. | | Core concepts | Instructions, reference. | | Reference | Instructions, explanations. |

References

Skills similaires