Notre avis
Mappe les menaces et contrôles aux cadres de conformité (OWASP, SOC2, PCI-DSS, etc.) et génère des rapports de couverture et d'écarts.
Points forts
- Couverture large de cadres de conformité majeurs
- Génération de rapports structurés (JSON et Markdown)
- Évaluation automatique du statut de conformité (conforme, partiel, non conforme)
- Identification des lacunes et preuves liées aux contrôles
Limites
- Nécessite une modélisation préalable des menaces avec le format attendu
- L'exactitude dépend de la qualité et de l'exhaustivité des entrées
- Ne remplace pas un audit humain pour les décisions de conformité réelles
Lors d'une vérification de conformité, d'une cartographie vers des cadres de sécurité ou de la génération de documentation d'audit.
Si le modèle de menaces n'est pas encore structuré ou si la conformité à un cadre très spécifique non supporté est requise.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThe skill only uses Read, Write, and Glob tools to generate compliance reports and map threats to frameworks. It does not execute any commands or network activities, and does not instruct the agent to perform risky actions. No data exfiltration or destructive operations are involved.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
/tm-compliance --framework owasp/tm-compliance --framework soc2 --gaps-only/tm-compliance --framework custom --policy ./policies/my-policy.yamlname: tm-compliance description: Map threats and controls to compliance frameworks like OWASP Top 10, SOC2, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR. Generates compliance reports with coverage percentages and gaps. Use when checking compliance status, mapping to security frameworks, or generating audit documentation. allowed-tools: Read, Write, Glob
Compliance Mapping
Purpose
Map your threat model to compliance frameworks to:
- Calculate compliance coverage percentages
- Identify compliance gaps
- Generate audit-ready documentation
- Track requirements across multiple frameworks
Usage
/tm-compliance [--framework <name>] [--policy <path>] [--gaps-only]
Arguments:
--framework: Framework(s) to map: owasp, soc2, pci-dss, hipaa, gdpr, custom--policy: Path to custom policy document--gaps-only: Only show gaps/non-compliance
Supported Frameworks
OWASP Top 10 2021
| ID | Name | |----|------| | A01 | Broken Access Control | | A02 | Cryptographic Failures | | A03 | Injection | | A04 | Insecure Design | | A05 | Security Misconfiguration | | A06 | Vulnerable and Outdated Components | | A07 | Identification and Authentication Failures | | A08 | Software and Data Integrity Failures | | A09 | Security Logging and Monitoring Failures | | A10 | Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) |
SOC2 Trust Services Criteria
| Category | Description | |----------|-------------| | CC6.1 | Logical and Physical Access Controls | | CC6.2 | System Access Authentication | | CC6.3 | Access Restriction and Privileges | | CC6.6 | System Boundaries | | CC6.7 | Transmission Integrity | | CC6.8 | Data Integrity | | CC7.1 | Configuration Management | | CC7.2 | Change Management |
PCI-DSS v4.0
| Requirement | Description | |-------------|-------------| | 1 | Install and maintain network security controls | | 2 | Apply secure configurations | | 3 | Protect stored account data | | 4 | Protect cardholder data during transmission | | 5 | Protect from malicious software | | 6 | Develop and maintain secure systems | | 7 | Restrict access by business need | | 8 | Identify users and authenticate access | | 9 | Restrict physical access | | 10 | Log and monitor access | | 11 | Test security regularly | | 12 | Support information security with policies |
Mapping Process
For Each Framework Requirement
-
Identify related threats
- Match requirement to STRIDE categories
- Find threats in those categories
-
Identify related controls
- Find controls that mitigate related threats
- Check control implementation status
-
Assess compliance status
compliant: All related controls implementedpartial: Some controls implementednon-compliant: No controls or all missing
-
Document evidence
- Link to verified controls
- Note gaps
Output Files
compliance.json
{
"version": "1.0",
"generated": "ISO-8601",
"frameworks": [
{
"name": "OWASP Top 10 2021",
"version": "2021",
"overall_compliance": 82,
"mappings": [
{
"requirement_id": "A01:2021",
"requirement_name": "Broken Access Control",
"description": "Restrictions on authenticated users not properly enforced",
"stride_categories": ["elevation-of-privilege", "information-disclosure"],
"related_threats": ["threat-010", "threat-011"],
"related_controls": ["control-020", "control-021"],
"status": "partial",
"coverage": 85,
"gaps": ["gap-005"],
"evidence": [
"RBAC implemented in src/middleware/authorize.ts",
"Missing: Object-level authorization"
]
}
]
}
]
}
compliance-report.md (Visual Report)
# Compliance Report
**Generated**: [Date]
**Frameworks**: OWASP Top 10 2021, SOC2
## Executive Summary
COMPLIANCE OVERVIEW ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
OWASP Top 10 2021 ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── A01 Broken Access Control: ████████░░ 85% (1 gap) A02 Cryptographic Failures: ██████████ 100% A03 Injection: ███████░░░ 70% (3 gaps) A04 Insecure Design: ██████░░░░ 55% (5 gaps) A05 Security Misconfiguration: █████████░ 95% (1 gap) A06 Vulnerable Components: █████████░ 90% (1 gap) A07 Auth Failures: ████████░░ 75% (4 gaps) A08 Data Integrity Failures: ████████░░ 85% (2 gaps) A09 Logging Failures: ████████░░ 80% (2 gaps) A10 SSRF: ██████████ 100% ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── OVERALL: ████████░░ 82%
SOC2 Trust Services ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── CC6.1 Logical Access: █████████░ 90% (1 gap) CC6.2 Authentication: ████████░░ 80% (2 gaps) CC6.3 Access Restriction: █████████░ 95% (1 gap) ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── OVERALL: █████████░ 88%
## OWASP Top 10 2021
### A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ STATUS: ⚠ Partial (85%) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ RELATED THREATS: │ │ • THREAT-010: IDOR in user profile │ │ • THREAT-011: Missing function-level access control │ │ │ │ CONTROLS: │ │ ✓ RBAC implementation │ │ ⚠ Object-level authorization (partial) │ │ │ │ GAPS: │ │ • GAP-005: Missing object-level checks │ │ │ │ EVIDENCE: │ │ src/middleware/authorize.ts:15-89 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
### A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ STATUS: ✓ Compliant (100%) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ CONTROLS: │ │ ✓ TLS 1.3 enforced │ │ ✓ AES-256 encryption at rest │ │ ✓ Bcrypt password hashing │ │ │ │ EVIDENCE: │ │ src/config/tls.ts:5 │ │ src/db/encryption.ts:12 │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
[Additional requirements...]
STRIDE to Framework Mapping
OWASP Top 10
| STRIDE Category | OWASP Requirements | |-----------------|-------------------| | Spoofing | A07 | | Tampering | A03, A08 | | Repudiation | A09 | | Information Disclosure | A01, A02 | | Denial of Service | A05 | | Elevation of Privilege | A01, A04 |
SOC2
| STRIDE Category | SOC2 Criteria | |-----------------|---------------| | Spoofing | CC6.1, CC6.2 | | Tampering | CC6.7, CC6.8 | | Repudiation | CC7.2 | | Information Disclosure | CC6.1, CC6.3 | | Denial of Service | CC6.6 | | Elevation of Privilege | CC6.3 |
Instructions for Claude
When executing this skill:
-
Load threat model state:
- Read
.threatmodel/state/threats.json - Read
.threatmodel/state/controls.json - Read
.threatmodel/state/gaps.json
- Read
-
Load framework definitions:
- Reference built-in framework mappings
- Load custom policies if specified
-
For each framework:
- Map requirements to STRIDE categories
- Find related threats
- Find related controls
- Assess coverage
-
Calculate compliance:
- Per-requirement status
- Per-framework percentage
- Overall score
-
Generate reports with visuals IN THE FILES:
- JSON for programmatic use
- Markdown with ASCII progress bars, status boxes, and visual indicators
- The compliance-report.md MUST include:
- Visual progress bars:
████████░░ 85% - Status indicators:
✓,⚠,✗ - Visual box frames for each requirement
- Visual progress bars:
- These visuals go in the written file, not just console output
-
Console summary (also display to user):
Compliance Mapping Complete =========================== Frameworks Analyzed: 2 OWASP Top 10 2021: A01 Broken Access Control: ████████░░ 85% (1 gap) A02 Cryptographic Failures: ██████████ 100% A03 Injection: ███████░░░ 70% (3 gaps) ... Overall: 82% SOC2 Trust Services: CC6.1 Logical Access: █████████░ 90% (1 gap) CC6.2 Authentication: ████████░░ 80% (2 gaps) ... Overall: 88% Total Gaps: 11 High Priority: 4 Medium Priority: 5 Low Priority: 2 Files Created: .threatmodel/state/compliance.json .threatmodel/reports/compliance-report.md Next Steps: Run /tm-report to generate full risk report
Reference Files
Auditeur de Securite
Securite
Analyse le code pour detecter les vulnerabilites OWASP Top 10.
Checklist de Sécurité OWASP
Securite
Génère des checklists de sécurité applicative basées sur l'OWASP Top 10.
Modélisation de Menaces
Securite
Génère des documents de modélisation de menaces avec analyse STRIDE.