Notre avis
Crée ou met à jour une charte de décision pour standardiser les processus de décision récurrents.
Points forts
- Établit des règles claires pour les décisions récurrentes
- Améliore la cohérence et la responsabilité
- Propose trois modes: création, mise à jour et recherche
- Structure détaillée prête à l'emploi
Limites
- Nécessite d'identifier au préalable les schémas de décision
- Peut être excessif pour des décisions simples
- Ne remplace pas la substance de la décision elle-même
Pour formaliser une décision récurrente nécessitant cohérence et traçabilité.
Pour une décision unique ou urgente où la rapidité prime.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThis skill is a documentation template; no tools are called, no code is executed, and no destructive or data-exfiltrating actions are instructed.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
Create a Decision Interface Charter for team sprint prioritization decisions.Update the charter DIC-2025-003 to add a new escalation rule for budget overruns.Find all decision charters related to resource allocation.name: decision-charter description: Create or update a Decision Interface Charter for recurring decisions argument-hint: [decision type] or [update path/to/charter.md]
Document Intelligence
This skill supports three modes: Create, Update, and Find.
Mode Detection
| Signal | Mode | Confidence | |--------|------|------------| | "update", "revise", "modify" in input | UPDATE | 100% | | File path provided | UPDATE | 100% | | Charter ID mentioned (e.g., DIC-2026-001) | UPDATE | 100% | | "create", "new", "draft" in input | CREATE | 100% | | "find", "search", "list" | FIND | 100% | | "the charter", "our charter" | UPDATE | 85% | | Just decision type | CREATE | 60% |
Threshold: ≥85% auto-proceed | 70-84% state assumption | <70% ask user
Mode Behaviors
CREATE: Generate complete new charter using template below.
UPDATE:
- Check document registry first, then search user's structure
- Preserve charter ID and version history
- Update decision rules, criteria, or escalation paths
- Show diff summary
FIND: Check registry, then search user's folders for charters.
Create a Decision Interface Charter to govern how a recurring type of decision is made.
V2V Phase
Phase 2: Strategic Decisions - Decision charters establish governance for recurring decisions at any phase.
Prerequisites: Decision patterns identified, need for consistency recognized Outputs used by: All phases (provides decision governance)
Purpose
Decision Interface Charters establish the "rules of engagement" for recurring decisions, ensuring consistent quality and accountability.
Output Structure
# Decision Interface Charter: [Decision Type]
**Charter ID**: DIC-[YYYY]-[NNN]
**Version**: 1.0
**Last Updated**: [Date]
**Charter Owner**: [Role responsible for this charter]
## Decision Scope
**Decision Type**: [What recurring decision this governs]
**Examples**:
- [Example decision 1]
- [Example decision 2]
- [Example decision 3]
**Out of Scope**:
- [What this charter does NOT cover]
## Decision Classification
**Type**: Strategic / Portfolio / Execution
**Frequency**: [How often this decision typically occurs]
**Reversibility**: Low / Medium / High
**Impact**: Low / Medium / High
## Accountable Owner
**Role**: [Role, not person name]
**Authority**: [What they can decide unilaterally]
**Constraints**: [What requires escalation or consultation]
## Decision Forum & Cadence
**Forum**: [Where this is decided - e.g., "Weekly PLT meeting"]
**Cadence**: [When - e.g., "Thursdays 2pm"]
**Quorum**: [Who must be present]
**Duration**: [Expected time allocation]
## Required Inputs
| Role | Input Required | Format | Deadline |
|------|----------------|--------|----------|
| [Role 1] | [What they provide] | [Format] | [When before decision] |
| [Role 2] | [What they provide] | [Format] | [When before decision] |
| [Role 3] | [What they provide] | [Format] | [When before decision] |
## Decision Criteria
**Ready to Decide When:**
- [ ] [Criterion 1]
- [ ] [Criterion 2]
- [ ] [Criterion 3]
**Quality Threshold**: [What "good enough" looks like]
## Decision Rules
**How the decision is made:**
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]
**Tiebreaker**: [How to resolve if no clear answer]
## Escalation Rule
| Trigger | Escalate To | Timeline | Information Required |
|---------|-------------|----------|---------------------|
| [Trigger 1] | [Role] | [When] | [What to provide] |
| [Trigger 2] | [Role] | [When] | [What to provide] |
## Success Criteria
| Metric | Target | Timeframe | Measurement |
|--------|--------|-----------|-------------|
| Leading indicator | [Target] | T+2 weeks | [How measured] |
| Mid indicator | [Target] | T+6 weeks | [How measured] |
| Lagging indicator | [Target] | T+12 weeks | [How measured] |
## Re-decision Trigger
This decision should be revisited when:
- [Trigger 1]
- [Trigger 2]
- [Trigger 3]
## Communication Plan
| Audience | Channel | Timing | Owner |
|----------|---------|--------|-------|
| [Who needs to know] | [How] | [When] | [Who tells them] |
## Charter Review
**Review Frequency**: [How often to review this charter]
**Next Review**: [Date]
**Review Owner**: [Role]
Instructions
- Ask about the specific decision type if not clear
- Reference any governance documents provided via @file syntax
- Ensure accountable owner is a role, not a person
- Include specific escalation triggers
- Define measurable success criteria
- Save in charters/ folder
- Offer to create presentation version using /present
Priorisation de Tâches
Productivite
Priorise vos tâches avec les frameworks Eisenhower, ICE et RICE.
Generateur de Rapport Hebdomadaire
Productivite
Generez des rapports de statut hebdomadaires structures et concis.
Rapport de Daily Standup
Productivite
Génère des rapports de daily standup structurés et concis.