Rédaction de documentation style Metabase

VérifiéPrudence

Rédigez une documentation dans le style conversationnel, clair et centré sur l'utilisateur de Metabase. Pour créer ou modifier des fichiers docs.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DocumentationIntermédiaire
0029/08/2026
Claude Code
#technical-writing#style-guide#metabase#documentation#mdx

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Rédige et modifie des documentations selon le guide de style conversationnel et centré utilisateur de Metabase.

Points forts

  • Fournit des directives claires sur la structure, le ton et le format.
  • Inclut des exemples concrets de bonnes et mauvaises pratiques.
  • Encourage une relecture et une édition systématiques.
  • Intègre des commandes de formatage spécifiques (Prettier).

Limites

  • Spécifique au style de Metabase, donc pas universel.
  • Dépend d'un fichier de guide de style externe.
  • Ne remplace pas un jugement éditorial humain.
Quand l'utiliser

Lors de la création ou mise à jour de documentation utilisateur devant suivre le style Metabase.

Quand l'éviter

Pour des commentaires de code internes ou des documentations techniques hors du contexte Metabase.

Analyse de sécurité

Prudence
Score qualité90/100

The skill is documentation-focused and does not instruct destructive, exfiltrating, or obfuscated actions. The use of Bash is limited to formatting and is legitimate, so caution is appropriate due to the presence of a command execution capability.

Points d'attention
  • The skill declares Bash as an allowed tool and instructs running `bun run prettier --write <file-path>`, which executes code but is a standard formatting command.

Exemples

Draft a doc page
Write a new documentation page for the 'Custom Expressions' feature in Metabase, following the docs-write skill and the Metabase style guide.
Edit existing docs
Edit this guide to match Metabase's style: make headings imperative, use active voice, and remove vague links. Use the docs-write skill.
Audit documentation
Audit this file for common style mistakes per the docs-write skill: check for 'utilize', 'here' links, and non-conversational tone.

name: docs-write description: Write documentation following Metabase's conversational, clear, and user-focused style. Use when creating or editing documentation files (markdown, MDX, etc.). allowed-tools: Read, Write, Grep, Bash, Glob

Documentation Writing Skill

@./../_shared/metabase-style-guide.md

When writing documentation

Start here

  1. Who is this for? Match complexity to audience. Don't oversimplify hard things or overcomplicate simple ones.
  2. What do they need? Get them to the answer fast. Nobody wants to be in docs longer than necessary.
  3. What did you struggle with? Those common questions you had when learning? Answer them (without literally including the question).

Writing process

Draft:

  • Write out the steps/explanation as you'd tell a colleague
  • Lead with what to do, then explain why
  • Use headings that state your point: "Set SAML before adding users" not "SAML configuration timing"

Edit:

  • Read aloud. Does it sound like you talking? If it's too formal, simplify.
  • Cut anything that doesn't directly help the reader
  • Check each paragraph has one clear purpose
  • Verify examples actually work (don't give examples that error)

Polish:

  • Make links descriptive (never "here")
  • Backticks only for code/variables, bold for UI elements
  • American spelling, serial commas
  • Keep images minimal and scoped tight

Format:

  • Run prettier on the file after making edits: bun run prettier --write <file-path>
  • This ensures consistent formatting across all documentation

Common patterns

Instructions:

Run:
\`\`\`
command-to-run
\`\`\`

Then:
\`\`\`
next-command
\`\`\`

This ensures you're getting the latest changes.

Not: "(remember to run X before Y...)" buried in a paragraph.

Headings:

  • "Use environment variables for configuration" ✅
  • "Environment variables" ❌ (too vague)
  • "How to use environment variables for configuration" ❌ (too wordy)

Links:

Watch out for

  • Describing tasks as "easy" (you don't know the reader's context)
  • Using "we" when talking about Metabase features (use "Metabase" or "it")
  • Formal language: "utilize", "reference", "offerings"
  • Too peppy: multiple exclamation points
  • Burying the action in explanation
  • Code examples that don't work
  • Numbers that will become outdated

Quick reference

| Write This | Not This | | -------------------------- | ------------------ | | people, companies | users | | summarize | aggregate | | take a look at | reference | | can't, don't | cannot, do not | | Filter button | `Filter` button | | Check out the docs | Click here |

Skills similaires