Notre avis
Génère des notes de mise à jour destinées aux joueurs en traduisant le changelog interne, l’historique git et les données de sprint en un langage clair et engageant.
Points forts
- Automatise la conversion des données techniques du changelog en langage accessible aux joueurs
- Recueille des données de plusieurs sources : historique git, changelogs, rétrospectives de sprint
- Détecte et applique les guides de ton et les modèles pour une marque cohérente
- Propose trois styles de sortie : bref, détaillé et complet
Limites
- Exige un changelog ou un historique git existant ; sinon, il se bloque et demande de générer d’abord un changelog
- La traduction peut perdre des nuances, une relecture humaine est recommandée
- Conçu pour les notes destinées aux joueurs de jeux vidéo, pas pour les notes de version logicielles générales
Lorsque vous devez transformer rapidement un changelog interne et un historique git en notes de mise à jour soignées et accessibles aux joueurs.
Lorsque vous publiez des notes internes ou techniques sans public de joueurs, ou lorsqu’aucune donnée de changelog n’existe.
Analyse de sécurité
PrudenceThe skill uses Read, Glob, Grep, and Write for file operations and Bash to run git log. No destructive or exfiltrating commands are present. The Bash usage is limited to fallback changelog retrieval, which is legitimate but still warrants caution.
- •Uses Bash to execute git log commands. While the intended use is legitimate, Bash is a powerful tool that could be misused if arguments or repository state are manipulated.
Exemples
/patch-notes 1.2.0 --style brief/patch-notes 2.1.0 --style fullGenerate patch notes for version 1.4.0 using the template from docs/patch-notes-template.mdname: patch-notes description: "Generate player-facing patch notes from git history, sprint data, and internal changelogs. Translates developer language into clear, engaging player communication." argument-hint: "[version] [--style brief|detailed|full]" user-invocable: true allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Bash model: haiku agent: community-manager
Phase 1: Parse Arguments
version: the release version to generate notes for (e.g.,1.2.0)--style: output style —brief(bullet points),detailed(with context),full(with developer commentary). Default:detailed.
If no version is provided, ask the user before proceeding.
Phase 2: Gather Change Data
- Read the internal changelog at
production/releases/[version]/changelog.mdif it exists - Also check
docs/CHANGELOG.mdfor the relevant version entry - Run
git logbetween the previous release tag and current tag/HEAD as a fallback - Read sprint retrospectives in
production/sprints/for context - Read any balance change documents in
design/balance/ - Read bug fix records from QA if available
If no changelog data is available (neither production/releases/[version]/changelog.md
nor a docs/CHANGELOG.md entry for this version exists, and git log is empty or unavailable):
"No changelog data found for [version]. Run
/changelog [version]first to generate the internal changelog, then re-run/patch-notes [version]."
Verdict: BLOCKED — stop here without generating notes.
Phase 2b: Detect Tone Guide and Template
Tone guide detection — before drafting notes, check for writing style guidance:
- Check
.claude/docs/technical-preferences.mdfor any "tone", "voice", or "style" fields or sections. - Check
docs/PATCH-NOTES-STYLE.mdif it exists. - Check
design/community/tone-guide.mdif it exists. - If any source contains tone/voice/style instructions, extract them and apply them to the language and framing of the generated notes.
- If no tone guidance is found anywhere, default to: player-friendly, non-technical language; enthusiastic but not hyperbolic; focus on what the player experiences, not what the developer changed.
Template detection — check whether a patch notes template exists:
- Glob for
docs/patch-notes-template.mdand.claude/docs/templates/patch-notes-template.md. - If found at either location, read it and use it as the output structure for Phase 4 instead of the built-in style templates (Brief / Detailed / Full). Fill in the template's sections with the categorized data.
- If not found, use the built-in style templates as defined in Phase 4.
Phase 3: Categorize and Translate
Categorize all changes into player-facing categories:
- New Content: new features, maps, characters, items, modes
- Gameplay Changes: balance adjustments, mechanic changes, progression changes
- Quality of Life: UI improvements, convenience features, accessibility
- Bug Fixes: grouped by system (combat, UI, networking, etc.)
- Performance: optimization improvements players might notice
- Known Issues: transparency about unresolved problems
Translate developer language to player language:
- "Refactored damage calculation pipeline" → "Improved hit detection accuracy"
- "Fixed null reference in inventory manager" → "Fixed a crash when opening inventory"
- "Reduced GC allocations in combat loop" → "Improved combat performance"
- Remove purely internal changes that don't affect players
- Preserve specific numbers for balance changes (damage: 50 → 45)
Phase 4: Generate Patch Notes
Brief Style
# Patch [Version] — [Title]
**New**
- [Feature 1]
- [Feature 2]
**Changes**
- [Balance/mechanic change with before → after values]
**Fixes**
- [Bug fix 1]
- [Bug fix 2]
**Known Issues**
- [Issue 1]
Detailed Style
# Patch [Version] — [Title]
*[Date]*
## Highlights
[1-2 sentence summary of the most exciting changes]
## New Content
### [Feature Name]
[2-3 sentences describing the feature and why players should be excited]
## Gameplay Changes
### Balance
| Change | Before | After | Reason |
| ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
| [Item/ability] | [old value] | [new value] | [brief rationale] |
### Mechanics
- **[Change]**: [explanation of what changed and why]
## Quality of Life
- [Improvement with context]
## Bug Fixes
### Combat
- Fixed [description of what players experienced]
### UI
- Fixed [description]
### Networking
- Fixed [description]
## Performance
- [Improvement players will notice]
## Known Issues
- [Issue and workaround if available]
Full Style
Includes everything from Detailed, plus:
## Developer Commentary
### [Topic]
> [Developer insight into a major change — why it was made, what was considered,
> what the team learned. Written in first-person team voice.]
Phase 5: Review Output
Check the generated notes for:
- No internal jargon (replace technical terms with player-friendly language)
- No references to internal systems, tickets, or sprint numbers
- Balance changes include before/after values
- Bug fixes describe the player experience, not the technical cause
- Tone matches the game's voice (adjust formality based on game style)
Phase 6: Save Patch Notes
Present the completed patch notes to the user along with: a count of changes by category, and any internal changes that were excluded (for review).
Ask: "May I write these patch notes to docs/patch-notes/[version].md?"
If yes, write the file to docs/patch-notes/[version].md, creating the directory
if needed. Also write to production/releases/[version]/patch-notes.md as the
internal archive copy.
Phase 7: Next Steps
Verdict: COMPLETE — patch notes generated and saved.
- Run
/release-checklistto verify all other release gates are met before publishing. - Share the patch notes draft with the community-manager for tone review before posting publicly.
Atomiseur de Contenu
Contenu
Transforme un contenu unique en publications adaptées à chaque plateforme.
Rédacteur de Blog SEO
Contenu
Rédige des articles de blog optimisés SEO avec structure et mots-clés.
Scénariste YouTube
Contenu
Écrit des scripts YouTube engageants avec hooks, structure et rétention.