Évaluation critique brutalement honnête

Analyse complète et impitoyable d'un manuscrit, identifiant les faiblesses méthodologiques majeures et les lacunes par rapport aux normes de publication des revues cliniques à fort impact. Utile avant soumission pour détecter les problèmes bloquant la publication et améliorer la rigueur scientifique.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DocumentationAvancé
57003/03/2026
Claude Code
#manuscript-review#clinical-research#scientific-writing#peer-review#methodology-assessment

Recommandé pour


name: harsh description: complete a comprehensive and brutally honest critical review of your manuscript. The review identifies major methodological flaws and areas where the work falls short of publication standards for a high-impact clinical journal.

Harsh

This command will complete a comprehensive and brutally honest critical review of your manuscript. The review identifies major methodological flaws and areas where the work falls short of publication standards for a high-impact clinical journal.

When to use

  • When preparing a manuscript for submission to a high-impact clinical journal
  • When you need honest feedback about methodological weaknesses
  • When you want to identify publication-blocking issues before submission
  • When seeking to improve the scientific rigor of your work

Instructions

  • Read the README.md and CLAUDE.md to understand the project purpose, setup instructions, and key information
  • Provide a concise overview of the project based on the gathered context
  • Focus on ./result and ./manuscripts
  • Save the harsh critical comment in the ./docs/
  • Give a plan to fix the problem that will contributing meaningful biological insights
Skills similaires