Mémoire juridique

Rédige des mémoires juridiques structurés selon la méthode IRAC (Question, Règle, Application, Conclusion). Idéal pour les notes de service, résumés de cas et argumentaires.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
ContenuAvancé
0030/08/2026
Claude CodeCursorWindsurfCopilotCodex
#legal-brief#irac#legal-writing#case-summary#legal-memo

Recommandé pour


name: legal-brief description: "Draft a structured legal brief, case summary, or legal argument outline. Use when asked to write a legal brief, case note, legal memo, argument outline, or position paper. Produces a structured document using IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion)."

Legal Brief Skill

This skill drafts structured legal briefs and memos using IRAC format — the standard structure for legal writing.

Required Inputs

  • Brief type (legal memo / case summary / argument outline / position paper / letter before action)
  • Legal issue or question
  • Jurisdiction (England & Wales / US / EU / Other)
  • Relevant facts
  • Relevant law or cases (if known — otherwise flagged as [RESEARCH NEEDED])
  • Audience (internal memo / court submission / client letter)

Output Structure

Header

  • To: [Recipient]
  • From: [Author]
  • Date: [Date]
  • Re: [Matter reference]
  • Confidential: Subject to legal professional privilege

Issue(s)

One sentence per legal question:

  • Issue 1: Whether X constitutes Y under [law]

Brief Answer

One sentence per issue — conclusion upfront before analysis.

Facts

Concise relevant facts only. Flag disputed facts.

Law (Rule)

  • Relevant statute, regulation, or case law
  • How the rule has been interpreted in key cases
  • Flag [RESEARCH NEEDED] where law is not provided

Application

  • Arguments in favour
  • Counter-arguments and responses
  • Areas of uncertainty flagged explicitly

Conclusion

  • Clear answer to each issue
  • Overall recommendation
  • Suggested next steps

Caveats

What this memo does not cover. What additional research would change the analysis.


WARNING: This draft requires review by a qualified legal professional. It does not constitute legal advice.

Quality Checks

  • [ ] Issue is stated as a specific legal question (not a general topic)
  • [ ] Brief answer appears before the analysis (conclusion upfront)
  • [ ] Disputed facts are explicitly flagged
  • [ ] Areas of legal uncertainty are noted (not hidden in confident language)
  • [ ] Caveats section lists what would change the analysis
  • [ ] Disclaimer is included

Anti-Patterns

  • [ ] Do not present uncertain legal positions with confident language — areas of legal ambiguity must be flagged explicitly, not smoothed over
  • [ ] Do not omit the disclaimer — every legal brief output must include the professional review caveat before the user treats it as advice
  • [ ] Do not structure the brief chronologically — IRAC format (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) must be used regardless of how the user framed the request
  • [ ] Do not cite cases or statutes from memory without flagging them as [REQUIRES VERIFICATION] — hallucinated citations are worse than no citations
  • [ ] Do not conflate jurisdiction — legal positions in England & Wales, US, and EU can differ materially; always confirm jurisdiction before stating the rule

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Draft a legal memo on [issue]"
  • "Write a legal brief arguing [position]"
  • "Summarise the legal position on [topic]"
  • "Write a letter before action for [situation]"
Skills similaires