Rédaction de documentation Metabase

VérifiéPrudence

Apprenez à rédiger une documentation claire et centrée sur l'utilisateur selon le guide de style conversationnel de Metabase.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DocumentationDébutant
3029/08/2026
Claude CodeCursorWindsurfCopilotCodex
#documentation#writing#style-guide#metabase#technical-writing

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Cette compétence guide la rédaction de documentation dans le style conversationnel et clair de Metabase, couvrant l'analyse de l'audience, la rédaction, la révision et la mise en forme.

Points forts

  • Fournit des exemples concrets de bonnes et mauvaises pratiques pour les modèles courants.
  • Met l'accent sur une écriture centrée sur le lecteur et des titres concis orientés action.
  • Inclut une liste de vérification pratique et une commande de formatage pour garantir la cohérence.
  • Repère les pièges courants comme les chiffres obsolètes ou les exemples de code non fonctionnels.

Limites

  • Liée à une voix de marque spécifique (Metabase), pas universelle.
  • Dépend d'un guide de style externe pour le contexte complet.
  • Se concentre sur la prose documentaire, pas les références API ou les schémas.
Quand l'utiliser

À utiliser lors de la création ou de l'édition de documentation utilisateur ou de contenu d'aide devant correspondre au ton de Metabase.

Quand l'éviter

À éviter pour les écrits non documentaires comme les messages de commit, les textes marketing ou les notes internes.

Analyse de sécurité

Prudence
Score qualité90/100

The skill is for documentation writing and only uses Bash for running Prettier formatting, a legitimate and safe command. However, allowing Bash introduces potential for arbitrary command execution if misused, so caution is appropriate.

Points d'attention
  • Declares Bash as allowed tool and instructs running 'bun run prettier --write <file-path>'; benign but Bash is a powerful tool.

Exemples

Draft a SAML setup guide
Write a step-by-step guide for setting up SAML in Metabase, following our docs style guide. Keep it conversational and user-focused. Use headings that state the point, and provide copy-pasteable commands.
Edit my draft to match style
Review my draft documentation for [feature]. Apply the Metabase style guide: simplify formal language, make headings action-oriented, fix links, and format code blocks properly. Also run prettier on the file.
Rewrite a paragraph in Metabase style
Rewrite the following documentation paragraph to match Metabase's conversational style. Use plain language and cut anything that doesn't help the reader: [paste text here]

name: docs-write description: Write documentation following Metabase's conversational, clear, and user-focused style. Use when creating or editing documentation files (markdown, MDX, etc.). allowed-tools: Read, Write, Grep, Bash, Glob

Documentation Writing Skill

@./../_shared/metabase-style-guide.md

When writing documentation

Start here

  1. Who is this for? Match complexity to audience. Don't oversimplify hard things or overcomplicate simple ones.
  2. What do they need? Get them to the answer fast. Nobody wants to be in docs longer than necessary.
  3. What did you struggle with? Those common questions you had when learning? Answer them (without literally including the question).

Writing process

Draft:

  • Write out the steps/explanation as you'd tell a colleague
  • Lead with what to do, then explain why
  • Use headings that state your point: "Set SAML before adding users" not "SAML configuration timing"

Edit:

  • Read aloud. Does it sound like you talking? If it's too formal, simplify.
  • Cut anything that doesn't directly help the reader
  • Check each paragraph has one clear purpose
  • Verify examples actually work (don't give examples that error)

Polish:

  • Make links descriptive (never "here")
  • Backticks only for code/variables, bold for UI elements
  • American spelling, serial commas
  • Keep images minimal and scoped tight

Format:

  • Run prettier on the file after making edits: bun run prettier --write <file-path>
  • This ensures consistent formatting across all documentation

Common patterns

Instructions:

Run:
\`\`\`
command-to-run
\`\`\`

Then:
\`\`\`
next-command
\`\`\`

This ensures you're getting the latest changes.

Not: "(remember to run X before Y...)" buried in a paragraph.

Headings:

  • "Use environment variables for configuration" ✅
  • "Environment variables" ❌ (too vague)
  • "How to use environment variables for configuration" ❌ (too wordy)

Links:

Watch out for

  • Describing tasks as "easy" (you don't know the reader's context)
  • Using "we" when talking about Metabase features (use "Metabase" or "it")
  • Formal language: "utilize", "reference", "offerings"
  • Too peppy: multiple exclamation points
  • Burying the action in explanation
  • Code examples that don't work
  • Numbers that will become outdated

Quick reference

| Write This | Not This | | -------------------------- | ------------------ | | people, companies | users | | summarize | aggregate | | take a look at | reference | | can't, don't | cannot, do not | | Filter button | `Filter` button | | Check out the docs | Click here |

Skills similaires