Synthèse automatique
Génère et archive les documents de tâches Navigator — des plans d'implémentation structurés dans .agent/tasks/ — soit en amont d'une fonctionnalité, soit après coup à partir de la conversation.
Points forts
- Modèle complet et réutilisable : contexte, objectifs, phases, décisions techniques, commandes de vérification et checklist de fin
- Détermine automatiquement l'identifiant suivant à partir du préfixe dans .agent/.nav-config.json et des fichiers existants
- Deux modes clairs : plan prospectif au démarrage ou document rétrospectif reconstruit depuis les 30-50 derniers messages
- Règles d'invocation explicites (quand ne pas invoquer) qui limitent les mauvais déclenchements
Limites
- Suppose une arborescence Navigator existante (.agent/tasks/, .nav-config.json) ; inutilisable telle quelle ailleurs
- La qualité du mode archivage dépend entièrement de la conversation encore présente dans le contexte
- Se limite à l'écriture de fichiers Markdown dans .agent/tasks/, sans synchronisation avec un outil de gestion de projet externe
À utiliser au démarrage d'une fonctionnalité pour poser un plan d'implémentation, ou à la fin des travaux pour en garder une trace durable.
À ne pas utiliser pour consulter des tâches existantes, rédiger des SOP ou mettre à jour la documentation système, qui relèvent d'autres skills.
Analyse de sécurité
PrudenceThe skill only reads config, lists task files, and writes/edits Markdown documentation under `.agent/tasks/`. Bash usage is limited to directory listing and running project test/build commands, all legitimate for a documentation helper. There are no destructive commands, no network exfiltration, no secret handling, and no obfuscated payloads, so risk is low but non-trivial because it may execute project commands via Bash.
- •Declares Bash and instructs filesystem listing (`ls .agent/tasks/*.md`) and reads of `.agent/.nav-config.json`
- •References running build/test/type-check commands as part of 'Verify' sections
Exemples
Create a task doc for the OAuth implementation — we're going to add Google and GitHub providers.Document this notification feature I just built, it's done.Archive TASK-07 — the rate limiter is finished and merged.name: nav-task description: Manage Navigator task documentation - create implementation plans, archive completed tasks, update task index. Use when user starts new feature, completes work, or says "document this feature". allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash version: 1.0.0
Navigator Task Manager Skill
Create and manage task documentation - implementation plans that capture what was built, how, and why.
When to Invoke
Invoke this skill when the user:
- Says "document this feature", "archive this task"
- Says "create task doc for...", "document what I built"
- Completes a feature and mentions "done", "finished", "complete"
- Starts new feature and says "create implementation plan"
DO NOT invoke if:
- User is asking about existing tasks (use Read, not creation)
- Creating SOPs (that's nav-sop skill)
- Updating system docs (different skill)
Execution Steps
Step 1: Determine Task ID
If user provided task ID (e.g., "TASK-01", "GH-123"):
- Use their ID directly
If no ID provided:
- Read
.agent/.nav-config.jsonfortask_prefix - Check existing tasks:
ls .agent/tasks/*.md - Generate next number:
{prefix}-{next-number} - Example: Last task is TASK-05, create TASK-06
Step 2: Determine Action (Create vs Archive)
Creating new task (starting feature):
User: "Create task doc for OAuth implementation"
→ Action: CREATE
→ Generate empty implementation plan template
Archiving completed task (feature done):
User: "Document this OAuth feature I just built"
→ Action: ARCHIVE
→ Generate implementation plan from conversation
Step 3A: Create New Task (If Starting Feature)
Generate task document from template:
# TASK-{XX}: {Feature Name}
**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
**Created**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Assignee**: {from PM tool or "Manual"}
---
## Context
**Problem**:
[What problem does this solve?]
**Goal**:
[What are we building?]
**Success Criteria**:
- [ ] [Specific measurable outcome]
- [ ] [Another outcome]
---
## Implementation Plan
### Phase 1: {Name}
**Goal**: [What this phase accomplishes]
**Tasks**:
- [ ] [Specific task]
- [ ] [Another task]
**Files**:
- `path/to/file.ts` - [Purpose]
### Phase 2: {Name}
...
---
## Technical Decisions
| Decision | Options Considered | Chosen | Reasoning |
|----------|-------------------|--------|-----------|
| [What] | [Option A, B, C] | [Chosen] | [Why] |
---
## Dependencies
**Requires**:
- [ ] {prerequisite task or setup}
**Blocks**:
- [ ] {tasks waiting on this}
---
## Verify
Run these commands to validate the implementation:
```bash
# Run tests
[test command for this feature]
# Type check
[type check command]
# Build
[build command]
Done
Observable outcomes that prove completion:
- [ ] [Specific file/API exists and exports expected interface]
- [ ] [Tests pass - specify count or coverage target]
- [ ] [Build succeeds without errors]
- [ ] [User-observable behavior works as specified]
Notes
[Any additional context, links, references]
Completion Checklist
Before marking complete:
- [ ] Implementation finished
- [ ] Tests written and passing
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Code reviewed (if team)
- [ ] Deployed/merged
Last Updated: {YYYY-MM-DD}
Save to: `.agent/tasks/TASK-{XX}-{slug}.md`
### Step 3B: Archive Completed Task (If Feature Done)
Generate task document from conversation:
1. **Analyze conversation** (last 30-50 messages):
- What was built?
- How was it implemented?
- What decisions were made?
- What files were modified?
2. **Generate implementation plan**:
```markdown
# TASK-{XX}: {Feature Name}
**Status**: ✅ Completed
**Created**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Completed**: {YYYY-MM-DD}
---
## What Was Built
[1-2 paragraph summary of the feature]
---
## Implementation
### Phase 1: {Actual phase completed}
**Completed**: {Date}
**Changes**:
- Created `src/auth/oauth.ts` - OAuth provider integration
- Modified `src/routes/auth.ts` - Added login/logout endpoints
- Updated `src/config/passport.ts` - Passport configuration
**Key Code**:
```typescript
// Example of key implementation
export const oauthLogin = async (req, res) => {
// Implementation details
};
Phase 2: {Next phase}
...
Technical Decisions
| Decision | Options | Chosen | Reasoning | |----------|---------|--------|-----------| | Auth library | next-auth, passport.js, auth0 | passport.js | Better control over OAuth flow, smaller bundle | | Token storage | localStorage, cookies, sessionStorage | httpOnly cookies | XSS protection, automatic transmission | | Session store | memory, Redis, PostgreSQL | Redis | Fast, scalable, separate from DB |
Files Modified
src/auth/oauth.ts(created) - OAuth integrationsrc/routes/auth.ts(modified) - Added auth endpointssrc/config/passport.ts(created) - Passport setuptests/auth.test.ts(created) - Auth testsREADME.md(updated) - OAuth setup instructions
Challenges & Solutions
Challenge: OAuth callback URL mismatch
- Problem: Redirects failed in production
- Solution: Added environment-specific callback URLs
- Commit: abc1234
Challenge: Session persistence across restarts
- Problem: Users logged out on server restart
- Solution: Redis session store
- Commit: def5678
Testing
- ✅ Unit tests:
src/auth/*.test.ts(15 tests, 100% coverage) - ✅ Integration tests: OAuth flow end-to-end
- ✅ Manual testing: Tested with Google, GitHub providers
Documentation
- ✅ README updated with OAuth setup instructions
- ✅ Environment variables documented in
.env.example - ✅ API endpoints documented in
docs/api.md
Verify
Commands executed to validate:
# Actual commands run during verification
npm test src/auth
npm run type-check
npm run build
Results: All passed ✅
Done
Outcomes confirmed:
- [x]
src/auth/oauth.tsexports OAuth provider integration - [x] All tests pass (15 tests, 100% coverage)
- [x] Build succeeds without errors
- [x] OAuth login/logout flows work correctly
Related
SOPs Created:
.agent/sops/integrations/oauth-setup.md
System Docs Updated:
.agent/system/project-architecture.md(added auth section)
Completed: {YYYY-MM-DD} Implementation Time: {X hours/days}
Save to: `.agent/tasks/TASK-{XX}-{slug}.md`
### Step 3.5: Verify Interpretation (ToM Checkpoint - Archive Mode Only) [EXECUTE]
**IMPORTANT**: This step MUST be executed when archiving tasks (not creating new ones).
**Before committing archive documentation, confirm interpretation with user**.
**Display verification** (only for ARCHIVE action):
I extracted this from our session: ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
What was built:
- {FEATURE_SUMMARY}
Key decisions captured:
- {DECISION_1}: {REASONING_1}
- {DECISION_2}: {REASONING_2}
Files changed: {COUNT} total
- {FILE_1} ({ACTION}: {PURPOSE})
- {FILE_2} ({ACTION}: {PURPOSE})
Challenges solved:
- {CHALLENGE_1}: {SOLUTION_1} ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Corrections needed? [Enter to proceed / type corrections]
**Always verify for ARCHIVE** because:
- Extracting from conversation is inference-based
- User may have made decisions not explicitly stated
- Some files may have been modified outside conversation
- Ensures accurate historical record
**Skip verification for CREATE** because:
- Template is mostly empty
- User fills in details themselves
- No inference risk
### Step 4: Update Navigator Index
Edit `.agent/DEVELOPMENT-README.md` to add task to index:
```markdown
## Active Tasks
- **TASK-{XX}**: {Feature Name} (Status: In Progress/Completed)
- File: `.agent/tasks/TASK-{XX}-{slug}.md`
- Started: {Date}
- [Completed: {Date}]
Keep index organized (active tasks first, completed below).
Step 4.5: Sync to Knowledge Graph (v6.0.0+)
If knowledge graph exists, sync task to graph:
if [ -f ".agent/knowledge/graph.json" ]; then
python3 skills/nav-graph/functions/task_to_graph.py \
--action add \
--task-path ".agent/tasks/TASK-{XX}-{slug}.md" \
--graph-path .agent/knowledge/graph.json
fi
What this does:
- Extracts concepts from task content (auth, api, testing, etc.)
- Adds task node to graph with status and concepts
- Creates
implementsedges from task to concepts - For completed tasks: Extracts Technical Decisions as
decisionmemories
Output:
Added task: TASK-XX
Title: {Feature Name}
Status: completed
Concepts: auth, api, testing
Decisions extracted: 2
This makes the task queryable via "What do we know about auth?" and preserves architectural decisions as persistent memories.
Step 5: Update PM Tool (If Configured)
If PM tool is Linear:
create_comment({
issueId: "TASK-XX",
body: "📚 Implementation plan documented: .agent/tasks/TASK-XX-feature.md"
})
If PM tool is GitHub:
gh issue comment {ISSUE-NUMBER} -b "📚 Implementation plan: .agent/tasks/TASK-XX-feature.md"
If PM tool is none: Skip PM update.
Step 6: Confirm Success
Show completion message:
✅ Task documentation created!
Task: TASK-{XX} - {Feature Name}
File: .agent/tasks/TASK-{XX}-{slug}.md
Size: {X} KB (~{Y} tokens)
📋 Contains:
- Implementation phases
- Technical decisions
- Files modified
- [If archived: Challenges & solutions]
- [If archived: Testing & documentation]
🔗 Navigator index updated
[If PM tool: PM tool comment added]
To reference later:
Read .agent/tasks/TASK-{XX}-{slug}.md
Task Document Template Structure
For New Tasks (Planning)
- Context (problem/goal)
- Implementation plan (phases)
- Technical decisions (to be made)
- Dependencies
- Completion checklist
For Completed Tasks (Archive)
- What was built (summary)
- Implementation (actual phases)
- Technical decisions (what was chosen)
- Files modified
- Challenges & solutions
- Testing & documentation
Common Use Cases
Starting New Feature
User: "Create task doc for payments integration"
→ Generates TASK-07-payments.md
→ Empty template for planning
→ User fills in as they work
Completing Feature
User: "Document the auth feature I just finished"
→ Analyzes conversation
→ Generates TASK-06-auth.md
→ Complete implementation record
→ Archives for future reference
Mid-Feature Update
User: "Update TASK-05 with OAuth decision"
→ Reads existing TASK-05-auth.md
→ Adds to Technical Decisions section
→ Preserves rest of document
Error Handling
Navigator not initialized:
❌ .agent/tasks/ directory not found
Run /nav:init to set up Navigator structure first.
Task ID already exists (for creation):
⚠️ TASK-{XX} already exists
Options:
1. Read existing task
2. Use different ID
3. Archive/overwrite existing
Your choice [1-3]:
Insufficient context to archive:
⚠️ Not enough conversation context to generate implementation plan
Consider:
- Provide more details about what was built
- Manually create task doc
- Skip archiving
Continue with template? [y/N]:
Success Criteria
Task documentation is successful when:
- [ ] Task file created in
.agent/tasks/ - [ ] Filename follows convention:
TASK-{XX}-{slug}.md - [ ] Contains all required sections
- [ ] Navigator index updated
- [ ] PM tool updated (if configured)
- [ ] User can reference task later
Scripts
generate_task.py: Create task documentation from conversation
- Input: Conversation history, task ID
- Output: Formatted task markdown
update_index.py: Update DEVELOPMENT-README.md task index
- Input: New task info
- Output: Updated index
Best Practices
Good task slugs:
oauth-implementation(descriptive)stripe-payment-flow(clear purpose)user-profile-page(specific feature)
Bad task slugs:
feature(too vague)fix(not descriptive)task1(meaningless)
When to create task docs:
- ✅ Starting major feature (> 1 day work)
- ✅ Completing any feature (archive)
- ✅ Complex implementation (capture decisions)
- ❌ Tiny bug fixes (use SOPs instead)
- ❌ Exploratory work (wait until direction clear)
Notes
Task docs are living documents:
- Created when starting feature (template)
- Updated during implementation (decisions)
- Finalized when complete (archive)
They serve as:
- Planning tool (before implementation)
- Progress tracker (during implementation)
- Historical record (after completion)
- Knowledge base (for team/future)
This skill provides same functionality as /nav:doc feature command but with natural language invocation.
Du fichier au premier essai
Le téléchargement contient exactement le contenu affiché sur cette fiche. Cette copie peut différer de la dernière version du dépôt source.
Consulter la source et ses fichiers annexesCe téléchargement contient uniquement SKILL.md. Les scripts, références, modèles et dépendances éventuels ne sont pas inclus. Récupérez les fichiers nécessaires depuis la source en conservant leur arborescence avant de poursuivre.
1. Télécharger le fichier
Télécharger SKILL.mdDepuis la racine d’un projet de test, enregistrez le fichier sous .skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/SKILL.md, ou utilisez la commande suivante. Ce dossier sert à examiner la skill avant son installation.
Commande pour macOS/Linux ou WSL : un shell POSIX et curl sont nécessaires. Sous Windows sans WSL, utilisez le bouton de téléchargement et créez le dossier manuellement.
mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/download' --output '.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/SKILL.md'2. Vérifier les prérequis
Lisez SKILL.md avant de l’utiliser. Si le fichier cite des scripts ou services externes, examinez-les et préparez les accès nécessaires dans votre environnement de test.
Outils déclarés par l’auteur (à vérifier dans votre agent) : Read, Write, Edit, Bash
Aucune section de prérequis reconnue dans ce fichier. Cela ne signifie pas qu’il est autonome : les bibliothèques, outils et accès peuvent être cités ailleurs dans le contenu ou dans le dépôt source.
Les plateformes de la fiche sont des indications du catalogue. Les chemins ci-dessous suivent la documentation des outils ; ils ne prouvent pas que cette skill y a été exécutée. Aucune version minimale de ces outils n’est attestée pour cette fiche.
3. Charger la skill
Après vérification, copiez le dossier complet dans le projet avec l’une des commandes ci-dessous, puis ouvrez une nouvelle session de l’outil. La commande s’arrête si un dossier du même nom existe déjà : comparez les fichiers avant de le remplacer.
Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/nav-task' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf' '.claude/skills/nav-task'OpenSkills
OpenSkills doit déjà être installé. La procédure locale install/read est contrôlée avec OpenSkills 1.5.0, qui exige Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Aucun slug du catalogue n’est résolu automatiquement.
Installation officielle d’OpenSkillsopenskills install './.skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf'openskills read 'navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf'La lecture doit afficher le contenu du fichier installé et son dossier de base. Elle ne lance ni la skill ni ses dépendances.
Pour un agent qui lit AGENTS.md, synchronisez ensuite l’index. Cette commande modifie AGENTS.md : relisez le diff avant de l’utiliser.
openskills syncMode manuel ou autre outil : joignez SKILL.md à une conversation, ou ouvrez-le dans un agent capable de lire les fichiers. Ajoutez les ressources annexes nécessaires. Il n’existe pas de dossier universel reconnu par tous les outils.
4. Faire un premier essai
Utilisez une entrée courte et fictive : un endpoint d’API, un petit document ou un brief d’interface. Dans une nouvelle conversation, joignez le fichier ou donnez son chemin à l’agent, puis adaptez cette demande :
Lis .skill-downloads/navigator-task-manager-mm78nmwf/SKILL.md et applique ses instructions à cet exemple : [décrire une entrée de test]. Indique les fichiers, dépendances ou accès qui manquent. Produis le résultat demandé par la skill sans inventer de données ni exécuter de script non examiné.Résultat attendu : une sortie correspondant aux instructions de la skill, ou une liste précise des prérequis manquants. Une simple confirmation de lecture ne valide pas le premier usage. Si une ressource externe est indisponible, ce parcours reste à tester.
Rédaction de docs Supabase
Documentation
Rédigez, éditez et révisez le contenu de la documentation Supabase : guides, tutoriels, références et partiels. Suivez les guides de style et les règles de validation MDX/TOML.
Créer un enregistrement de décision d'architecture
Documentation
Créer un nouveau ADR avec numérotation séquentielle, l'enregistrer dans le graphe AgentDB et le lier aux ADR associés.
Mise à jour de plan avec recherche approfondie
Documentation
Met à jour un document de plan en lançant des sous-agents en parallèle pour analyser un sujet sur tous les passes du compilateur, puis consolide les résultats.