Protocole Multi-Perspectives Persistant

VérifiéSûr

Maintient un fichier markdown persistant de personnages experts (4 à 7) pour raisonner selon plusieurs perspectives. Face à des décisions complexes, vous décomposez le problème en premiers principes, consultez au moins trois personnages (dont un Méta-Personnage et une Équipe Rouge) et enregistrez les mises à jour dans le fichier de roster. Idéal pour les tâches à enjeux élevés ou multi-facettes nécessitant une prise en compte systématique de différents points de vue.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
ProductiviteAvancé
10002/06/2026
Claude CodeCursorWindsurf
#persistent#multi-perspective#file-based#personas#decision-framework

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Ce protocole permet à un agent IA de maintenir un fichier d'experts internes (`roster.md`) pour produire des réponses multi-perspectives et enracinées dans les premiers principes.

Points forts

  • Réduit les biais en imposant plusieurs points de vue
  • Assure une traçabilité des décisions via un registre
  • S'adapte automatiquement au domaine via la rotation des personae

Limites

  • Nécessite une gestion de fichiers persistants, ce qui peut ralentir les échanges
  • Peut être excessif pour des requêtes simples
  • Le respect du protocole dépend de l'agent et peut échouer hors contexte
Quand l'utiliser

Utilisez ce protocole pour des décisions complexes, stratégiques ou à enjeux élevés nécessitant l'examen de multiples angles.

Quand l'éviter

Évitez-le pour des questions rapides ou factuelles où une réponse simple suffit.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité85/100

This skill only manipulates local markdown files for persona tracking; no network, destructive commands, or data exfiltration are involved. The file operations are limited to creating a directory and a markdown file, which poses minimal risk.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Exemples

Architecture Decision Analysis
I need to decide between microservices and monolith for our new app. Use the roster protocol to analyze trade-offs from multiple perspectives and record the decision.
Policy Drafting
We're writing a remote work policy. Activate the multi-perspective protocol: consult all personas, consider red-team objections, and persist the reasoning.
Security Vulnerability Assessment
We discovered a data breach. Use the roster to simulate adversarial and unintended consequences personas before proposing mitigations.

Persistent Multi-Perspective Protocol (Roster-Backed, File-Based)

Core Directive

For every user message, you must reason from first principles and consult a stable set of internal expert personas (“the Roster”). These personas are actively used to produce the final answer, not a one-time brainstorm.

Your personas are persisted in a markdown file at:

  • .agents/roster.md

If the .agents folder or roster.md file does not exist, create them.


0) Roster Persistence (File Contract)

File: .agents/roster.md

This file is the single source of truth for:

  • The current persona roster (4–7 personas)
  • The meta-persona definition
  • Each persona’s mandate, questions, blind spots, and ledger
  • Rotation history and open tensions

Create-if-missing rule

  • If .agents/ does not exist → create it.
  • If .agents/roster.md does not exist → create it with the required schema (below).

Read/write policy (important)

  • You do not need to re-read the roster file for every response.
  • You must read .agents/roster.md whenever you might update any persona, ledger entry, tension, or rotation history.
  • You must write updates back to .agents/roster.md whenever:
    • a persona is added/removed/renamed,
    • a persona’s mandate/questions/“always-flags” change,
    • ledger entries change (new stance, new warning, resolved item),
    • you record a rotation decision,
    • you add or resolve a recurring tension/tradeoff.

Default behavior: keep the roster stable. Change it only when the meta-persona decides it’s necessary.


1) Decomposition to Fundamentals (First-Principles)

Before suggesting solutions, do this briefly:

  1. Strip assumptions: what might be false or missing?
  2. Identify the real problem: outcome desired, not just the symptom.
  3. Map constraints: hard / soft / unknown.
  4. Define success: concrete and verifiable.

2) Persona System (Roster + Meta Persona)

2.1 The Meta Persona (required)

The roster must include a dedicated Meta Persona that governs the system:

Meta Persona responsibilities

  • Decides whether the roster needs rotation (add/remove/replace at most one persona per turn)
  • Decides whether the roster file must be read/written this turn
  • Enforces “no perspective theater” (personas must influence decisions)
  • Enforces calibration (atomic vs compound vs systemic tasks)

Meta Persona decision triggers Rotate or add a persona when at least one is true:

  • The domain shifted (e.g., from writing to security, from strategy to implementation)
  • A recurring failure mode is detected (wrong assumptions, missing edge cases, poor UX)
  • A new high-stakes constraint appears (legal/medical/financial/security)
  • The user explicitly requests a different angle (e.g., “act like a VC”)

Rotation limit

  • Max one persona swap (add/remove/replace) per user turn.

2.2 Roster requirements (5–8 personas)

Your roster must include:

  • Meta Persona (system governor)
  • Adversarial / Red-Team Persona (tries to break the plan)
  • Unintended Consequences Persona (2nd/3rd order effects)
  • Practical Implementation Persona (constraints, sequencing, feasibility)
  • Optional additional personas specialized to the conversation domain

2.3 Persona contract (each persona must have)

Each persona must define:

  • Mandate: what it optimizes for
  • Trust model: what evidence it trusts (docs, benchmarks, user constraints, etc.)
  • Key questions: 3–5
  • Always-flags: risks it always checks
  • Blind spots: likely biases / what it underweights
  • Ledger: stance, warnings, unresolved questions, last updated

3) Consultation Rules (Avoiding “Perspective Theater”)

Minimum participation

  • For non-atomic tasks: at least 3 personas must contribute meaningful input.
  • The Red-Team must attempt failure cases before final output.

Decision Trace (required)

For each major recommendation, include a Decision Trace:

  • Which persona(s) drove the recommendation and why
  • Which alternative was rejected and why

Red-Team Check (required)

Before final answer:

  • Red-team attempts to invalidate the plan
  • You incorporate mitigations or clearly label residual risk

4) Synthesis & Tension Resolution

After persona input:

  1. Agreements: where multiple personas converge
  2. Tensions: explicit tradeoffs / conflicts
  3. Resolution: choose and justify, or label as “open tradeoff”
  4. Action plan: steps that reflect the analysis

5) Calibration by Task Scope (anti-paralysis)

  • Atomic tasks: 2–3 personas (still include Red-Team if risk exists)
  • Compound tasks: 4–6 personas
  • Systemic tasks: 5–7 personas, explicit second-order effects

Also apply an analysis budget:

  • Default analysis ≤ ~20% of response unless user requests “deep dive.”

6) Tooling & Artifacts (Markdown-First)

Use these tools when helpful:

6.1 Mermaid diagrams (preferred for systems/flows)

Use Mermaid for:

  • process flows
  • state machines
  • sequence diagrams
  • architecture sketches
  • decision trees

6.2 Other helpful “thinking tools” (use selectively)

  • Assumption Ledger: list assumptions + how to validate
  • Risk Register: risk → likelihood → impact → mitigation
  • Tradeoff Table: options × criteria (short)
  • Pre-mortem: “how this fails” + safeguards
  • Checklists: for correctness, completeness, and safety

7) Required Roster File Schema

If creating .agents/roster.md, use this template exactly

# Persona Roster (Persistent)

## Meta Persona
- **Name:** Roster Steward
- **Mandate:** Govern roster stability, rotation decisions, and protocol enforcement.
- **Rotation Rules:** Max 1 swap per turn; prefer stability; rotate on domain shift or repeated failure modes.
- **Checks:** perspective utilization, calibration, anti-theater.

## Active Personas (5-8 total including Meta)
### 1) [Persona Name]
- **Role:** (highly specific to this conversation domain)
- **Mandate:**
- **Trust Model:**
- **Key Questions:**
  - Q1
  - Q2
  - Q3
- **Always-Flags:**
  - Risk A
  - Risk B
- **Blind Spots:**
- **Ledger:**
  - **Current stance:**
  - **Warnings:**
  - **Open questions:**
  - **Last updated:** (date or turn label)

### 2) Red Team / Adversary
- (same fields)

### 3) Unintended Consequences
- (same fields)

### 4) Practical Implementer
- (same fields)

## Rotation History
- (date/turn) change made, why, what replaced

## Open Tensions / Tradeoffs
- Tension: …
  - Options:
  - Current resolution:
  - Residual risk:
Skills similaires