Recherche de Sujet Philosophique

VérifiéSûr

Menez une recherche web structurée sur un sujet philosophique pour produire des notes de recherche académiques organisées.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
ContenuIntermédiaire
2002/06/2026
Claude Code
#philosophical-research#web-search#research-notes#tenet-evaluation

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Effectue une recherche web approfondie sur un sujet philosophique et produit des notes structurées avec évaluation par rapport aux principes du site.

Points forts

  • Production de notes de recherche détaillées et organisées
  • Évaluation explicite des sources selon des principes directeurs
  • Identification des positions majeures, débats et lacunes
  • Génération automatique de liens et citations

Limites

  • Ne produit que des notes, pas de contenu final
  • Dépend de la qualité des résultats de recherche web
  • Peut nécessiter des clarifications sur le sujet si vague
Quand l'utiliser

Lorsque vous devez préparer une base de recherche fiable avant de rédiger un article ou d'explorer un nouveau thème philosophique.

Quand l'éviter

Si vous avez besoin d'un contenu final prêt à publier ou si le sujet est très courant et bien connu sans besoin d'analyse des sources.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité90/100

The skill only performs web searches on philosophical topics and writes structured markdown notes. It does not involve any destructive actions, code execution, or data exfiltration. No risky tools are used.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Exemples

Research free will
/research-topic free will
Research consciousness from todo
From the todo item 'research-topic: consciousness', run the research topic skill.
Monthly gap research
Perform monthly gap research on the topic of 'moral luck' using the research-topic skill.

name: research-topic description: Research a philosophical topic using web search. Outputs research notes, not finished content.

Research Topic

Conduct web research on a philosophical topic and produce structured research notes.

When to Use

  • Before writing a new article
  • When a todo item is type research-topic
  • When /research-topic [topic] is invoked
  • Monthly gap research

Instructions

1. Clarify the Topic

If a specific topic is provided, use it directly.

If invoked from todo.md, extract the topic from the task description.

2. Web Research

Use WebSearch to find:

Primary Academic Sources

  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (plato.stanford.edu)
  • Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (iep.utm.edu)
  • PhilPapers (philpapers.org)

Key Thinkers

  • Who are the major philosophers on this topic?
  • What are their main positions?
  • What are the key debates?

Historical Context

  • How has thinking evolved on this topic?
  • What are the major milestones?

Scientific Connections

  • What relevant scientific research exists?
  • How do empirical findings inform the philosophy?

Contemporary Discussions

  • What are current debates?
  • Are there recent developments?

3. Evaluate Sources Against Tenets

For each major position found, note:

  • Does it align with site tenets?
  • Does it conflict with any tenet?
  • How would site tenets respond to this view?

4. Generate Research Notes

Create notes at obsidian/research/[TOPIC-SLUG]-YYYY-MM-DD.md:

---
title: Research Notes - [Topic]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
draft: false
ai_contribution: 100
ai_system: [current model]
---

# Research: [Topic]

**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Search queries used**: [list]

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentence overview of what was found]

## Key Sources

### [Source Title]
- **URL**: [url]
- **Type**: Encyclopedia/Paper/Book/Article
- **Key points**:
  - Point 1
  - Point 2
- **Tenet alignment**: Aligns/Conflicts/Neutral with [tenet]
- **Quote**: "[notable quote]"

## Major Positions

### [Position Name] (e.g., "Physicalism")
- **Proponents**: [names]
- **Core claim**: [summary]
- **Key arguments**: [list]
- **Relation to site tenets**: [analysis]

### [Position Name] (e.g., "Property Dualism")
[Similar format]

## Key Debates

### [Debate Title]
- **Sides**: [who argues what]
- **Core disagreement**: [what they disagree about]
- **Current state**: [resolved? ongoing?]

## Historical Timeline

| Year | Event/Publication | Significance |
|------|-------------------|--------------|
| YYYY | [event] | [why it matters] |

## Potential Article Angles

Based on this research, an article could:
1. [Angle 1 - how it would align with tenets]
2. [Angle 2 - alternative approach]

When writing the article, follow `obsidian/project/writing-style.md` for:
- Named-anchor summary technique for forward references
- Background vs. novelty decisions (what to include/omit)
- Tenet alignment requirements
- LLM optimization (front-load important information)

## Gaps in Research

- [What couldn't be found]
- [What needs deeper investigation]

## Citations

[Full citation list in consistent format]

5. Update Todo

If this was a todo item, mark it complete and note the output file.

6. Log to Changelog

Append summary to obsidian/workflow/changelog.md.

Important

  • This skill ONLY produces research notes
  • Does NOT generate article content
  • Use /expand-topic to write articles based on research
  • Always cite sources with URLs
  • Be honest about tenet conflicts - don't hide opposing views
  • Note where research is incomplete
Skills similaires