Notre avis
Effectue une recherche web structurée sur un sujet philosophique et produit des notes de recherche organisées dans un fichier Obsidian.
Points forts
- Utilise des sources académiques reconnues (Stanford Encyclopedia, PhilPapers).
- Structure les notes avec des sections claires (résumé, positions, débats, chronologie).
- Intègre une évaluation de l'alignement avec les principes du site.
Limites
- Ne produit que des notes de recherche, pas de contenu final.
- Nécessite un accès à la recherche web et une configuration Obsidian.
- Peut être limité par la qualité des résultats de recherche.
Utilisez cette compétence lorsque vous devez explorer un sujet philosophique avant de rédiger un article ou lorsqu'une tâche de type 'research-topic' apparaît.
Évitez cette compétence si vous avez besoin d'un contenu prêt à publier directement, ou si le sujet ne nécessite pas de recherche approfondie.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThe skill instructs web searching and structured note creation on philosophical topics. It does not execute destructive commands, exfiltrate data, or perform any risky operations. The use of WebSearch and file writing is legitimate and contained within a personal research workflow.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
/research-topic free willResearch the philosophy of consciousness and provide structured notes.name: research-topic description: Research a philosophical topic using web search. Outputs research notes, not finished content.
Research Topic
Conduct web research on a philosophical topic and produce structured research notes.
When to Use
- Before writing a new article
- When a todo item is type
research-topic - When
/research-topic [topic]is invoked - Monthly gap research
Instructions
1. Clarify the Topic
If a specific topic is provided, use it directly.
If invoked from todo.md, extract the topic from the task description.
2. Web Research
Use WebSearch to find:
Primary Academic Sources
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (plato.stanford.edu)
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (iep.utm.edu)
- PhilPapers (philpapers.org)
Key Thinkers
- Who are the major philosophers on this topic?
- What are their main positions?
- What are the key debates?
Historical Context
- How has thinking evolved on this topic?
- What are the major milestones?
Scientific Connections
- What relevant scientific research exists?
- How do empirical findings inform the philosophy?
Contemporary Discussions
- What are current debates?
- Are there recent developments?
3. Evaluate Sources Against Tenets
For each major position found, note:
- Does it align with site tenets?
- Does it conflict with any tenet?
- How would site tenets respond to this view?
4. Generate Research Notes
Create notes at obsidian/research/[TOPIC-SLUG]-YYYY-MM-DD.md:
---
title: Research Notes - [Topic]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
draft: false
ai_contribution: 100
ai_system: [current model]
---
# Research: [Topic]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Search queries used**: [list]
## Executive Summary
[3-5 sentence overview of what was found]
## Key Sources
### [Source Title]
- **URL**: [url]
- **Type**: Encyclopedia/Paper/Book/Article
- **Key points**:
- Point 1
- Point 2
- **Tenet alignment**: Aligns/Conflicts/Neutral with [tenet]
- **Quote**: "[notable quote]"
## Major Positions
### [Position Name] (e.g., "Physicalism")
- **Proponents**: [names]
- **Core claim**: [summary]
- **Key arguments**: [list]
- **Relation to site tenets**: [analysis]
### [Position Name] (e.g., "Property Dualism")
[Similar format]
## Key Debates
### [Debate Title]
- **Sides**: [who argues what]
- **Core disagreement**: [what they disagree about]
- **Current state**: [resolved? ongoing?]
## Historical Timeline
| Year | Event/Publication | Significance |
|------|-------------------|--------------|
| YYYY | [event] | [why it matters] |
## Potential Article Angles
Based on this research, an article could:
1. [Angle 1 - how it would align with tenets]
2. [Angle 2 - alternative approach]
When writing the article, follow `obsidian/project/writing-style.md` for:
- Named-anchor summary technique for forward references
- Background vs. novelty decisions (what to include/omit)
- Tenet alignment requirements
- LLM optimization (front-load important information)
## Gaps in Research
- [What couldn't be found]
- [What needs deeper investigation]
## Citations
[Full citation list in consistent format]
5. Update Todo
If this was a todo item, mark it complete and note the output file.
6. Log to Changelog
Append summary to obsidian/workflow/changelog.md.
Important
- This skill ONLY produces research notes
- Does NOT generate article content
- Use
/expand-topicto write articles based on research - Always cite sources with URLs
- Be honest about tenet conflicts - don't hide opposing views
- Note where research is incomplete
Atomiseur de Contenu
Contenu
Transforme un contenu unique en publications adaptées à chaque plateforme.
Rédacteur de Blog SEO
Contenu
Rédige des articles de blog optimisés SEO avec structure et mots-clés.
Scénariste YouTube
Contenu
Écrit des scripts YouTube engageants avec hooks, structure et rétention.