Extraction de compétences de session
Extraire les découvertes non évidentes d'une session en compétences réutilisables persistantes. Utilisé pour documenter les solutions de débogage, contournements et flux de travail multi-étapes.
name: learn description: | Extract reusable knowledge from the current session into a persistent skill. Use when you discover something non-obvious, create a workaround, or develop a multi-step workflow that future sessions would benefit from. author: Claude Code Academic Workflow version: 1.0.0 argument-hint: "[skill-name (kebab-case)]" allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write", "Bash", "Glob", "Grep"]
/learn — Skill Extraction Workflow
Extract non-obvious discoveries into reusable skills that persist across sessions.
When to Use This Skill
Invoke /learn when you encounter:
- Non-obvious debugging — Investigation that took significant effort, not in docs
- Misleading errors — Error message was wrong, found the real cause
- Workarounds — Found a limitation with a creative solution
- Tool integration — Undocumented API usage or configuration
- Trial-and-error — Multiple attempts before success
- Repeatable workflows — Multi-step task you'd do again
- User-facing automation — Reports, checks, or processes users will request
Workflow Phases
PHASE 1: Evaluate (Self-Assessment)
Before creating a skill, answer these questions:
- "What did I just learn that wasn't obvious before starting?"
- "Would future-me benefit from this being documented?"
- "Was the solution non-obvious from documentation alone?"
- "Is this a multi-step workflow I'd repeat?"
Continue only if YES to at least one question.
PHASE 2: Check Existing Skills
Search for related skills to avoid duplication:
# Check project skills
ls .claude/skills/ 2>/dev/null
# Search for keywords
grep -r -i "KEYWORD" .claude/skills/ 2>/dev/null
Outcomes:
- Nothing related → Create new skill (continue to Phase 3)
- Same trigger & fix → Update existing skill (bump version)
- Partial overlap → Update with new variant
PHASE 3: Create Skill
Create the skill file at .claude/skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md:
---
name: descriptive-kebab-case-name
description: |
[CRITICAL: Include specific triggers in the description]
- What the skill does
- Specific trigger conditions (exact error messages, symptoms)
- When to use it (contexts, scenarios)
author: Claude Code Academic Workflow
version: 1.0.0
argument-hint: "[expected arguments]" # Optional
---
# Skill Name
## Problem
[Clear problem description — what situation triggers this skill]
## Context / Trigger Conditions
[When to use — exact error messages, symptoms, scenarios]
[Be specific enough that you'd recognize it again]
## Solution
[Step-by-step solution]
[Include commands, code snippets, or workflows]
## Verification
[How to verify it worked]
[Expected output or state]
## Example
[Concrete example of the skill in action]
## References
[Documentation links, related files, or prior discussions]
PHASE 4: Quality Gates
Before finalizing, verify:
- [ ] Description has specific trigger conditions (not vague)
- [ ] Solution was verified to work (tested)
- [ ] Content is specific enough to be actionable
- [ ] Content is general enough to be reusable
- [ ] No sensitive information (credentials, personal data)
- [ ] Skill name is descriptive and uses kebab-case
Output
After creating the skill, report:
✓ Skill created: .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md
Trigger: [when to use]
Problem: [what it solves]
Example: Creating a Skill
User discovers that a specific R package silently drops observations:
---
name: fixest-missing-covariate-handling
description: |
Handle silent observation dropping in fixest when covariates have missing values.
Use when: estimates seem wrong, sample size unexpectedly small, or comparing
results between packages.
author: Claude Code Academic Workflow
version: 1.0.0
---
# fixest Missing Covariate Handling
## Problem
The fixest package silently drops observations when covariates have NA values,
which can produce unexpected results when comparing to other packages.
## Context / Trigger Conditions
- Sample size in fixest is smaller than expected
- Results differ from Stata or other R packages
- Model has covariates with potential missing values
## Solution
1. Check for NA patterns before regression:
```r
summary(complete.cases(data[, covariates]))
- Explicitly handle NA values or use
na.actionparameter - Document the expected sample size in comments
Verification
Compare nobs(model) with nrow(data) — difference indicates dropped obs.
References
- fixest documentation on missing values
- [LEARN:r-code] entry in MEMORY.md
Skills similaires
Priorisation de Tâches
Priorise vos tâches avec les frameworks Eisenhower, ICE et RICE.
Generateur de Rapport Hebdomadaire
Generez des rapports de statut hebdomadaires structures et concis.
Rapport de Daily Standup
Génère des rapports de daily standup structurés et concis.