Simplification de compétence avec vérification d'intégrité

Cette compétence analyse les fichiers SKILL.md pour détecter les redondances, optimise le contenu en supprimant les éléments descriptifs tout en préservant le code fonctionnel et la logique, puis vérifie l'intégrité fonctionnelle. Elle est déclenchée par des commandes telles que "simplify skill" et garantit qu'aucune fonctionnalité n'est perdue lors de la simplification.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
ProductiviteAvancé
62008/03/2026
Claude CodeCursor
#skill-optimization#content-simplification#functional-verification#workflow-automation#code-analysis

Recommandé pour


name: skill-simplify description: SKILL.md simplification with functional integrity verification. Analyze redundancy, optimize content, check no functionality lost. Triggers on "simplify skill", "optimize skill", "skill-simplify". allowed-tools: AskUserQuestion, Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep

Skill Simplify

Three-phase pipeline: analyze functional inventory, apply optimization rules, verify integrity.

Phase Reference Documents (read on-demand):

| Phase | Document | Purpose | |-------|----------|---------| | 1 | phases/01-analysis.md | Extract functional inventory, identify redundancy, validate pseudo-code format | | 2 | phases/02-optimize.md | Apply simplification rules, fix format issues | | 3 | phases/03-check.md | Verify functional integrity, validate format |

Input Processing

const targetPath = input.trim()
const targetFile = targetPath.endsWith('.md') ? targetPath : `${targetPath}/SKILL.md`
const originalContent = Read(targetFile)
const originalLineCount = originalContent.split('\n').length

TodoWrite Pattern

TodoWrite({ todos: [
  { content: `Phase 1: Analyzing ${targetFile}`, status: "in_progress", activeForm: "Extracting functional inventory" },
  { content: "Phase 2: Optimize", status: "pending" },
  { content: "Phase 3: Integrity Check", status: "pending" }
]})

Core Rules

  1. Preserve ALL functional elements: Code blocks with logic, agent calls, data structures, routing, error handling, input/output specs
  2. Only reduce descriptive content: Flowcharts, verbose comments, duplicate sections, examples that repeat logic
  3. Never summarize algorithm logic: If-else branches, function bodies, schemas must remain verbatim
  4. Classify code blocks: Distinguish functional (logic, routing, schemas) from descriptive (ASCII art, examples, display templates) — only descriptive blocks may be deleted
  5. Merge equivalent variants: Single/multi-perspective templates differing only by a parameter → one template with variant comment
  6. Fix format issues: Nested backtick template literals in code fences → convert to prose; hardcoded option lists → flag for dynamic generation; workflow handoff references → ensure execution steps present
  7. Validate pseudo-code: Check bracket matching, variable consistency, structural completeness
  8. Quantitative verification: Phase 3 counts must match Phase 1 counts for functional categories; descriptive block decreases are expected

Error Handling

| Error | Resolution | |-------|------------| | Target file not found | Report error, stop | | Check FAIL (missing functional elements) | Show delta, revert to original, report which elements lost | | Check WARN (descriptive decrease or merge) | Show delta with justification | | Format issues found | Report in check, fix in Phase 2 |

Skills similaires
Simplification de compétence avec vérification d'intégrité | Skills Guide