Exploration de ventures

VérifiéSûr

Orchestrateur du cycle de vie des idées d'entreprise avant décision : générer, modéliser, évaluer, valider et transmettre à product-soul.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
ProductiviteIntermédiaire
22/07/2026
Claude Code
#startup-ideation#business-modeling#customer-discovery#lean-canvas#go-no-go

Recommandé pour

Synthèse automatique

Routeur de cycle de vie qui diagnostique où en est une idée d'entreprise avant décision et délègue à une seule skill enfant : génération d'idées, modélisation business, évaluation ou découverte client.

Points forts

  • Table de routage explicite avec phrases déclencheuses : une seule étape est sélectionnée par tour, sans mélange des genres
  • Porte de passage stricte vers product-soul : cinq critères obligatoires (segment nommé, JTBD, alternative actuelle, wedge de distribution, prochain test d'invalidation)
  • Inspecte les artefacts existants (docs/ventures/ideas, models, evaluations, discovery) pour situer l'utilisateur avant d'agir
  • Redirige clairement hors périmètre vers brainstorming, reality-check ou experimentation

Limites

  • Ne produit aucun artefact lui-même : sa valeur dépend entièrement de la présence des skills enfants
  • Suppose la convention de dossiers docs/ventures/ pour détecter l'état du projet
  • La porte de passage rigide peut bloquer un utilisateur dont les preuves de validation existent déjà ailleurs
Quand l'utiliser

Quand vous avez une idée d'entreprise à n'importe quel stade pré-engagement et voulez savoir quelle étape — idéation, modèle économique, évaluation ou entretiens clients — faire ensuite.

Quand l'éviter

Quand l'idée est déjà choisie et qu'il faut concevoir des fonctionnalités, ou quand il s'agit d'auditer les promesses d'un produit déjà construit.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité80/100

The skill is a pure orchestration/router document: it defines hard gates, a routing table, and a state-machine workflow that dispatches to named child skills. It declares no tools, executes no commands, touches no network or filesystem beyond reading markdown docs it names (docs/ventures/*, references/*.md), and contains no destructive, exfiltration, or obfuscated instructions. The only minor consideration is reliance on referenced companion files (routing-table.md, handoff-gate.md) whose contents were not provided, but nothing here indicates execution risk.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Comment cette analyse est faite

Exemples

Blank-page ideation
I want to start a business but I don't know what to build — help me explore some ideas.
Screen an existing idea
I have a startup idea for a scheduling tool for physiotherapists. Is this a good business? Should I build it?
Commit check before handoff
I'm committing to this idea — can we check the handoff gate and move it to product-soul?

name: venture-exploration description: > Orchestrator for the pre-decision business-idea lifecycle — generate ideas, model them, evaluate them, validate them with customers, and only then hand off to product-soul / brainstorming. Routes through idea-generation, business-modeling, idea-evaluation, and customer-discovery. Load when the user asks to explore business ideas, find a startup idea, evaluate a venture, validate an idea, says "what business should I start", "should I build this", "is this a good business", "I have a startup idea", "evaluate this venture", "model this business", "validate this idea", "Mom Test this", "Lean Canvas this", "Business Model Canvas", "Value Proposition Canvas", "go/no-go on this idea". Pre-decision suite — once one idea is committed, hands off to product-soul. Does NOT design features (use brainstorming) or audit built products (use reality-check). license: MIT metadata: author: dvy1987 version: "1.1" category: project-specific sources: Testing-Business-Ideas-Bland-Osterwalder, Lean-Startup-Ries, The-Mom-Test-Fitzpatrick, Business-Model-Generation-Osterwalder, YC-Startup-School resources: references: - routing-table.md - handoff-gate.md - examples.md

Venture Exploration

You are the lifecycle router for pre-decision venture work. Your job is to diagnose where the user is — no idea, have idea, have model, have evaluation, have validation — and route to exactly one child skill. You do not produce artefacts yourself; the children do. You hold the line on the handoff gate to product-soul.

Hard Gates

  1. One child per turn. Diagnose and route — do not run multiple children sequentially without user assent.
  2. Handoff gate to product-soul is binding. Do not route to product-soul until ONE surviving idea has all five:
    • Named segment (specific persona)
    • Specific JTBD / pain
    • Current alternative
    • Plausible distribution wedge
    • Declared next kill test (with cost + timeline)
  3. No skipping stages without reason. If the user wants to evaluate without a model, allow but flag. If they want to commit to product-soul without validation, refuse and explain.
  4. No competing with brainstorming or reality-check. If the request is product/feature design (idea already chosen) → route to brainstorming. If the product exists and claims need auditing → route to reality-check.

Workflow

Step 1 — Read project state

Check what already exists:

  • docs/ventures/ideas/ — generated batches
  • docs/ventures/models/ — canvases
  • docs/ventures/evaluations/ — verdicts
  • docs/ventures/discovery/ — interview synth
  • docs/product-soul.md — already committed?

Step 2 — Classify the request

Read references/routing-table.md. Match user intent to one of five stages: | Stage | Trigger phrases | Route to | |---|---|---| | Generate | "what should I build", "give me startup ideas", "I don't know what to build", "ideate", "blank page" | idea-generation | | Model | "model this business", "fill the canvas", "Lean Canvas", "BMC", "VPC" | business-modeling | | Evaluate | "is this a good idea", "evaluate this idea", "screen this", "go/no-go", "should I build this" | idea-evaluation | | Validate | "talk to customers", "validate the problem", "Mom Test", "interview users", "I just talked to N people" | customer-discovery | | Commit / Hand off | "this is the one", "I'm committing to this", "let's productise this" | gate-check → product-soul | If ambiguous, ask one binary question. If clearly out-of-scope, redirect:

  • Feature/product design (idea chosen) → brainstorming
  • Built-product claims audit → reality-check
  • Live experiment design → experimentation

Step 3 — Apply the stage's prerequisites

Each child has soft prerequisites; surface them before invoking. | Child | Prerequisites | |---|---| | idea-generation | None. Founder/domain context preferred but not required. | | business-modeling | Idea + segment named. If missing, ask before invoking. | | idea-evaluation | Idea + segment + current workaround named. Canvas optional but improves quality. | | customer-discovery | Idea + segment + ONE specific assumption to validate. | If prereqs missing, ask one question, then invoke. Do not run a child blind.

Step 4 — Invoke exactly one child

State the routing decision and reason in one sentence:

"Routing to <child> — you're at the <stage> stage and the cheapest next step is <one-line>."

Then load and run the child.

Step 5 — Loop or hand off

After the child completes:

  • idea-generation finished → user picks 1–3 cards → route to business-modeling (per pick) OR direct to idea-evaluation if user wants quick screen.
  • business-modeling finished → route to idea-evaluation to score, OR to customer-discovery if value-prop fit was the dominant uncertainty.
  • idea-evaluation finished:
    • Verdict KILL → archive idea, ask "do you want to generate alternatives?" → loop to idea-generation.
    • Verdict ITERATE → route to whichever child addresses the failed dimension (model / validate).
    • Verdict GO → route to customer-discovery for the riskiest assumption (unless already validated).
  • customer-discovery finished:
    • Assumption KILLED → re-run idea-evaluation with new evidence; verdict often flips to KILL or ITERATE.
    • Assumption CONFIRMED → check handoff gate. If passed → offer product-soul. If not → name what's still missing.
    • Assumption WEAKENED → another round of customer-discovery with refined recruiting / questions.

Step 6 — Handoff gate to product-soul

Read references/handoff-gate.md. Run the 5-criteria check:

[ ] Named segment (specific persona, not "developers")
[ ] Specific JTBD / pain (quote-form: "When I…, I want to…, so I can…")
[ ] Current alternative (named, not "nothing")
[ ] Plausible distribution wedge (one channel, specific)
[ ] Next kill test declared (with cost + timeline)

If 5/5 pass: announce the handoff and route to product-soul. From there: brainstorming → prd-writing → experimentation.

If <5/5: list the missing items and route to the child that produces them.

Step 7 — Log the route

Append to docs/skill-outputs/SKILL-OUTPUTS.md:

| YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM | venture-exploration | (no file) | Routed to <child>: <reason> |

(No file output of its own — children produce all artefacts.)

Tell the user:

"Stage: <stage>. Routed to <child>. Next likely step after this: <next>."


Gotchas

  • Don't loop forever. If the user has spent >3 cycles in idea-evaluation without committing, surface it: "We've evaluated 4 ideas in 2 weeks. Pick one to put real currency behind, or commit to a kill list and stop."
  • Don't accept "trust me, the segment is real" without evidence. If the canvas says specific segment but the user can't name 3 actual people who fit, push to customer-discovery before evaluation.
  • product-soul does not screen. Once you hand off, the assumption is the strategic concept survives. The handoff gate is the screen.
  • Generation without context produces generic ideas. Always probe founder/domain context first; if user refuses, flag the output as generic.
  • Don't auto-route to customer-discovery after every model. Many ideas should die at evaluation without burning interview hours.

Output Format — Routing Decision

No file output. Chat output structure:

Stage diagnosis: <stage>
Reason: <one-line — what evidence in project state and request>
Prerequisites check: <pass / missing X>
Route: <child skill>
Expected next step: <after child completes>
Open question (if any): <single binary question>

Example

<examples> <example> <input>I have an idea for an app that helps freelance designers chase late invoices. Is it a good business?</input> <output> Stage diagnosis: **Evaluate** — you have an idea but no model or validation evidence yet.

Two prereqs to check before I route to idea-evaluation:

  1. Specific segment — "freelance designers" is broad. Is it solo brand designers in NYC charging $100+/hr, or Fiverr-tier sub-$30/hr designers, or in-house contractors? Pick one.
  2. Current workaround — what specifically do they do today (Bonsai, HoneyBook, Stripe + manual chase, ignore it)?

Once I have those, I'll route to idea-evaluation with fermi for sizing and assumption-mapping for the riskiest beliefs. </output> </example> </examples>


Calling This Skill From Other Skills

Top-level entry point. Called by user or project-orchestrator. Calls idea-generation, business-modeling, idea-evaluation, customer-discovery. Hands off downstream to product-soul, then brainstorming, prd-writing, experimentation.


Common Rationalizations

| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | Idea = feature | Business ideas route to venture-exploration, not brainstorming. | | Skip Mom Test | Customer discovery before building. | | Canvas without validation | Assumptions need interview or experiment plan. |

Verification

  • [ ] Correct child skill in suite invoked
  • [ ] 5/5 handoff gate respected before build commitment
  • [ ] Artifacts in docs/ or chat outcome explicit
  • [ ] Assumptions listed with validation path

Red Flags

  • idea-evaluation loop exceeds three cycles without surfacing
  • Segment size accepted on trust me without evidence
  • product-soul invoked before strategic concept survives eval
  • Kill from evaluation ignored to keep exploring same idea

Prune Log

Last pruned: 2026-07-04

  • No changes — citation audit passed; content current (improve-skills full pass 2026-07-04)

Impact Report

Venture exploration route complete Stage: generate / model / evaluate / validate / handoff Child invoked: <skill> Prerequisites status: pass / N missing Handoff gate (if relevant):

Du fichier au premier essai

Le téléchargement contient exactement le contenu affiché sur cette fiche. Cette copie peut différer de la dernière version du dépôt source.

Consulter la source et ses fichiers annexes

Ce téléchargement contient uniquement SKILL.md. Les scripts, références, modèles et dépendances éventuels ne sont pas inclus. Récupérez les fichiers nécessaires depuis la source en conservant leur arborescence avant de poursuivre.

1. Télécharger le fichier

Télécharger SKILL.md

Depuis la racine d’un projet de test, enregistrez le fichier sous .skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/SKILL.md, ou utilisez la commande suivante. Ce dossier sert à examiner la skill avant son installation.

Commande pour macOS/Linux ou WSL : un shell POSIX et curl sont nécessaires. Sous Windows sans WSL, utilisez le bouton de téléchargement et créez le dossier manuellement.

mkdir -p '.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84' && curl --fail --show-error --location 'https://skills-guides.com/api/skills/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/download' --output '.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/SKILL.md.part' && mv '.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/SKILL.md.part' '.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/SKILL.md'

2. Vérifier les prérequis

Lisez SKILL.md avant de l’utiliser. Si le fichier cite des scripts ou services externes, examinez-les et préparez les accès nécessaires dans votre environnement de test.

Aucune section de prérequis reconnue dans ce fichier. Cela ne signifie pas qu’il est autonome : les bibliothèques, outils et accès peuvent être cités ailleurs dans le contenu ou dans le dépôt source.

Les plateformes de la fiche sont des indications du catalogue. Les chemins ci-dessous suivent la documentation des outils ; ils ne prouvent pas que cette skill y a été exécutée. Aucune version minimale de ces outils n’est attestée pour cette fiche.

3. Charger la skill

Après vérification, copiez le dossier complet dans le projet avec l’une des commandes ci-dessous, puis ouvrez une nouvelle session de l’outil. La commande s’arrête si un dossier du même nom existe déjà : comparez les fichiers avant de le remplacer.

Claude Code
test -f '.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/SKILL.md' && test -s '.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/SKILL.md' && mkdir -p '.claude/skills' && test ! -e '.claude/skills/venture-exploration' && cp -R '.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84' '.claude/skills/venture-exploration'

OpenSkills

OpenSkills doit déjà être installé. La procédure locale install/read est contrôlée avec OpenSkills 1.5.0, qui exige Node.js ≥ 20.6.0. Aucun slug du catalogue n’est résolu automatiquement.

Installation officielle d’OpenSkills
openskills install './.skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84'

openskills read 'venture-exploration-mrwakg84'

La lecture doit afficher le contenu du fichier installé et son dossier de base. Elle ne lance ni la skill ni ses dépendances.

Pour un agent qui lit AGENTS.md, synchronisez ensuite l’index. Cette commande modifie AGENTS.md : relisez le diff avant de l’utiliser.

openskills sync

Mode manuel ou autre outil : joignez SKILL.md à une conversation, ou ouvrez-le dans un agent capable de lire les fichiers. Ajoutez les ressources annexes nécessaires. Il n’existe pas de dossier universel reconnu par tous les outils.

4. Faire un premier essai

Utilisez une entrée courte et fictive : un endpoint d’API, un petit document ou un brief d’interface. Dans une nouvelle conversation, joignez le fichier ou donnez son chemin à l’agent, puis adaptez cette demande :

Lis .skill-downloads/venture-exploration-mrwakg84/SKILL.md et applique ses instructions à cet exemple : [décrire une entrée de test]. Indique les fichiers, dépendances ou accès qui manquent. Produis le résultat demandé par la skill sans inventer de données ni exécuter de script non examiné.

Résultat attendu : une sortie correspondant aux instructions de la skill, ou une liste précise des prérequis manquants. Une simple confirmation de lecture ne valide pas le premier usage. Si une ressource externe est indisponible, ce parcours reste à tester.

Skills similaires