Patterns Python et Principes de Décision

VérifiéSûr

Cette compétence fournit des principes pour prendre des décisions en développement Python : sélection de framework (FastAPI, Django, Flask), choix entre asynchrone et synchrone, stratégie d'annotations de type et structure de projet. Elle aide les développeurs à choisir la bonne approche selon le contexte plutôt que de mémoriser des modèles fixes.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DeveloppementIntermédiaire
18002/06/2026
Claude CodeCursorWindsurf
#python#development#architecture#async-patterns#type-hints

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Une compétence qui fournit des principes de prise de décision pour le développement Python, couvrant la sélection de framework, le choix entre asynchrone et synchrone, les indications de type et la structure de projet pour 2025.

Points forts

  • Arbre de décision clair pour la sélection de framework en fonction du type de projet.
  • Enseigne les principes plutôt que des modèles figés, favorisant la compréhension.
  • Couvre les pratiques modernes comme la validation Pydantic et le choix de bibliothèques asynchrones.
  • Inclut des conseils sur l'utilisation des indications de type et la structure de projet adaptée.

Limites

  • Dépend des connaissances à jour de l'écosystème Python en 2025 ; certains détails peuvent devenir obsolètes.
  • Ne contient pas d'exemples de code spécifiques pour l'implémentation.
  • Suppose une familiarité de base avec Python ; ne convient pas aux débutants complets.
Quand l'utiliser

Utilisez cette compétence lorsque vous planifiez un nouveau projet Python et que vous avez besoin de conseils sur le choix du framework, l'approche asynchrone ou la structure du projet.

Quand l'éviter

N'utilisez pas cette compétence pour résoudre des bugs spécifiques ou lorsque vous avez besoin de code d'implémentation détaillé.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité95/100

The skill is a purely educational guide on Python development principles and decision-making. It does not instruct any code execution, destructive actions, or data exfiltration. There are no declared tools, and the content is advisory only.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Exemples

Framework selection advice
I need to build a real-time chat application using Python. Should I use FastAPI, Django, or something else? Consider async requirements.
Async vs sync for data pipeline
I'm writing a data pipeline that fetches from multiple APIs and processes data. Should I use async or sync? What libraries do you recommend?
Project structure for microservices
How should I structure a Python microservice project? I have multiple services with shared models.

name: python-patterns description: Python development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, type hints, project structure. Teaches thinking, not copying.

Python Patterns

💡 MCP Tool Available: Use Context7, Tavily, BraveSearch, or Serper.dev first; only if those fail, use WebSearch or WebFetch as needed.

Python development principles and decision-making for 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize patterns.


⚠️ How to Use This Skill

This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.

  • ASK user for framework preference when unclear
  • Choose async vs sync based on CONTEXT
  • Don't default to same framework every time

1. Framework Selection (2025)

Decision Tree

What are you building?
│
├── API-first / Microservices
│   └── FastAPI (async, modern, fast)
│
├── Full-stack web / CMS / Admin
│   └── Django (batteries-included)
│
├── Simple / Script / Learning
│   └── Flask (minimal, flexible)
│
├── AI/ML API serving
│   └── FastAPI (Pydantic, async, uvicorn)
│
└── Background workers
    └── Celery + any framework

Comparison Principles

| Factor | FastAPI | Django | Flask | |--------|---------|--------|-------| | Best for | APIs, microservices | Full-stack, CMS | Simple, learning | | Async | Native | Django 5.0+ | Via extensions | | Admin | Manual | Built-in | Via extensions | | ORM | Choose your own | Django ORM | Choose your own | | Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |

Selection Questions to Ask:

  1. Is this API-only or full-stack?
  2. Need admin interface?
  3. Team familiar with async?
  4. Existing infrastructure?

2. Async vs Sync Decision

When to Use Async

async def is better when:
├── I/O-bound operations (database, HTTP, file)
├── Many concurrent connections
├── Real-time features
├── Microservices communication
└── FastAPI/Starlette/Django ASGI

def (sync) is better when:
├── CPU-bound operations
├── Simple scripts
├── Legacy codebase
├── Team unfamiliar with async
└── Blocking libraries (no async version)

The Golden Rule

I/O-bound → async (waiting for external)
CPU-bound → sync + multiprocessing (computing)

Don't:
├── Mix sync and async carelessly
├── Use sync libraries in async code
└── Force async for CPU work

Async Library Selection

| Need | Async Library | |------|---------------| | HTTP client | httpx | | PostgreSQL | asyncpg | | Redis | aioredis / redis-py async | | File I/O | aiofiles | | Database ORM | SQLAlchemy 2.0 async, Tortoise |


3. Type Hints Strategy

When to Type

Always type:
├── Function parameters
├── Return types
├── Class attributes
├── Public APIs

Can skip:
├── Local variables (let inference work)
├── One-off scripts
├── Tests (usually)

Common Type Patterns


# These are patterns, understand them:

# Optional → might be None
from typing import Optional
def find_user(id: int) -> Optional[User]: ...

# Union → one of multiple types
def process(data: str | dict) -> None: ...

# Generic collections
def get_items() -> list[Item]: ...
def get_mapping() -> dict[str, int]: ...

# Callable
from typing import Callable
def apply(fn: Callable[[int], str]) -> str: ...

Pydantic for Validation

When to use Pydantic:
├── API request/response models
├── Configuration/settings
├── Data validation
├── Serialization

Benefits:
├── Runtime validation
├── Auto-generated JSON schema
├── Works with FastAPI natively
└── Clear error messages

4. Project Structure Principles

Structure Selection

Small project / Script:
├── main.py
├── utils.py
└── requirements.txt

Medium API:
├── app/
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
│   ├── models/
│   ├── routes/
│   ├── services/
│   └── schemas/
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml

Large application:
├── src/
│   └── myapp/
│       ├── core/
│       ├── api/
│       ├── services/
│       ├── models/
│       └── ...
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml

FastAPI Structure Principles

Organize by feature or layer:

By layer:
├── routes/ (API endpoints)
├── services/ (business logic)
├── models/ (database models)
├── schemas/ (Pydantic models)
└── dependencies/ (shared deps)

By feature:
├── users/
│   ├── routes.py
│   ├── service.py
│   └── schemas.py
└── products/
    └── ...

5. Django Principles (2025)

Django Async (Django 5.0+)

Django supports async:
├── Async views
├── Async middleware
├── Async ORM (limited)
└── ASGI deployment

When to use async in Django:
├── External API calls
├── WebSocket (Channels)
├── High-concurrency views
└── Background task triggering

Django Best Practices

Model design:
├── Fat models, thin views
├── Use managers for common queries
├── Abstract base classes for shared fields

Views:
├── Class-based for complex CRUD
├── Function-based for simple endpoints
├── Use viewsets with DRF

Queries:
├── select_related() for FKs
├── prefetch_related() for M2M
├── Avoid N+1 queries
└── Use .only() for specific fields

6. FastAPI Principles

async def vs def in FastAPI

Use async def when:
├── Using async database drivers
├── Making async HTTP calls
├── I/O-bound operations
└── Want to handle concurrency

Use def when:
├── Blocking operations
├── Sync database drivers
├── CPU-bound work
└── FastAPI runs in threadpool automatically

Dependency Injection

Use dependencies for:
├── Database sessions
├── Current user / Auth
├── Configuration
├── Shared resources

Benefits:
├── Testability (mock dependencies)
├── Clean separation
├── Automatic cleanup (yield)

Pydantic v2 Integration


# FastAPI + Pydantic are tightly integrated:

# Request validation
@app.post("/users")
async def create(user: UserCreate) -> UserResponse:
    # user is already validated
    ...

# Response serialization

# Return type becomes response schema

7. Background Tasks

Selection Guide

| Solution | Best For | |----------|----------| | BackgroundTasks | Simple, in-process tasks | | Celery | Distributed, complex workflows | | ARQ | Async, Redis-based | | RQ | Simple Redis queue | | Dramatiq | Actor-based, simpler than Celery |

When to Use Each

FastAPI BackgroundTasks:
├── Quick operations
├── No persistence needed
├── Fire-and-forget
└── Same process

Celery/ARQ:
├── Long-running tasks
├── Need retry logic
├── Distributed workers
├── Persistent queue
└── Complex workflows

8. Error Handling Principles

Exception Strategy

In FastAPI:
├── Create custom exception classes
├── Register exception handlers
├── Return consistent error format
└── Log without exposing internals

Pattern:
├── Raise domain exceptions in services
├── Catch and transform in handlers
└── Client gets clean error response

Error Response Philosophy

Include:
├── Error code (programmatic)
├── Message (human readable)
├── Details (field-level when applicable)
└── NOT stack traces (security)

9. Testing Principles

Testing Strategy

| Type | Purpose | Tools | |------|---------|-------| | Unit | Business logic | pytest | | Integration | API endpoints | pytest + httpx/TestClient | | E2E | Full workflows | pytest + DB |

Async Testing


# Use pytest-asyncio for async tests

import pytest
from httpx import AsyncClient

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_endpoint():
    async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url=" as client:
        response = await client.get("/users")
        assert response.status_code == 200

Fixtures Strategy

Common fixtures:
├── db_session → Database connection
├── client → Test client
├── authenticated_user → User with token
└── sample_data → Test data setup

10. Decision Checklist

Before implementing:

  • [ ] Asked user about framework preference?
  • [ ] Chosen framework for THIS context? (not just default)
  • [ ] Decided async vs sync?
  • [ ] Planned type hint strategy?
  • [ ] Defined project structure?
  • [ ] Planned error handling?
  • [ ] Considered background tasks?

11. Anti-Patterns to Avoid

❌ DON'T:

  • Default to Django for simple APIs (FastAPI may be better)
  • Use sync libraries in async code
  • Skip type hints for public APIs
  • Put business logic in routes/views
  • Ignore N+1 queries
  • Mix async and sync carelessly

✅ DO:

  • Choose framework based on context
  • Ask about async requirements
  • Use Pydantic for validation
  • Separate concerns (routes → services → repos)
  • Test critical paths

Remember: Python patterns are about decision-making for YOUR specific context. Don't copy code—think about what serves your application best.

Skills similaires