---

name: ape-prompt-improver description: Improves user prompts using the APE (Automatic Prompt Engineer) pipeline. Calls the ape CLI tool to generate, score, and rank improved variants of any prompt before executing it.

APE Prompt Improver

Automatically improve user prompts before acting on them by invoking the ape CLI — a tool inspired by the Automatic Prompt Engineer paper (Zhou et al., ICLR 2023).

When to use

Use this skill when:

• A user provides a vague, underspecified, or low-quality prompt
• The user explicitly asks you to improve or refine their prompt
• You want to ensure the best possible prompt is used before executing a complex task
• The user asks for help writing prompts for LLMs
• You are chaining prompts and want to optimize an intermediate step

Do not use this skill when:

• The user's prompt is already highly specific and well-structured
• The task is trivial (e.g. "what time is it")
• The user explicitly says not to modify their prompt
• Speed is critical and the extra API call would cause unacceptable delay

Prerequisites

The ape CLI must be installed and available:

bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --help

One of these environment variables must be set:

• OPENAI_API_KEY — for OpenAI-compatible providers
• ANTHROPIC_API_KEY — for Claude

Instructions

1. Identify the user's prompt that would benefit from improvement.

2. Run the ape CLI to generate and rank improved variants:

   For the single best variant (recommended for most cases):

   echo "<user's prompt>" | bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --single
   

   For the best variant as structured JSON:

   echo "<user's prompt>" | bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --json --single
   

   For multiple ranked variants to present as options:

   echo "<user's prompt>" | bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --json --count 3
   

3. Use the improved prompt. Depending on the context:

   • Silent improvement: Use the top-ranked variant directly as if the user wrote it. Best when the user won't notice or care about the rewording.
   • Suggest to user: Present the improved prompt and ask if they'd like to use it. Best when the change is significant or the user might want control.
   • Present options: Show 2–3 ranked variants and let the user pick. Best when the user explicitly asked for prompt help.

4. When presenting improvements to the user, explain what changed using the reasoning and feedback from the JSON output:

   echo "<prompt>" | bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --json --single
   

   The JSON output includes:

   • text — the improved prompt
   • reasoning — what was changed and why
   • scores.clarity — how clear the prompt is (1–10)
   • scores.specificity — how specific and detailed (1–10)
   • scores.effectiveness — how likely to produce a quality response (1–10)
   • overall — mean score (1–10)
   • feedback — brief evaluator commentary

5. Optional flags for fine-tuning:

   | Flag | Usage | |------|-------| | --provider claude | Use Claude instead of OpenAI | | --model <name> | Specify a particular model | | --base-url <url> | Point at a custom API endpoint | | --count <n> | Generate more or fewer variants (default: 5) | | --verbose | See the full scored table with color-coded ratings |

Examples

Silent improvement before executing a task

User: "summarize this article"
Agent thinks: This prompt is vague. Let me improve it.
Agent runs: echo "summarize this article" | bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --single
Agent gets: "Provide a concise summary of the following article, highlighting the key arguments, supporting evidence, and conclusions in 3-5 bullet points."
Agent uses the improved prompt internally.

Presenting an improved prompt to the user

User: "help me write a better prompt for generating code"
Agent runs: echo "generate code" | bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --json --single
Agent responds:
  "Here's an improved version of your prompt (scored 8.7/10):

   'You are an expert software engineer. Given the following requirements,
   generate clean, well-documented code with error handling...'

   Changes: Added role assignment, specified code quality expectations,
   and included error handling requirement."

Offering multiple options

User: "can you improve this prompt for me: explain quantum computing"
Agent runs: echo "explain quantum computing" | bunx @rodkings/ape-cli --json --count 3
Agent presents the top 3 variants with scores and lets the user choose.

How it works

The ape CLI implements a simplified version of the APE (Automatic Prompt Engineer) pipeline:

1. Generate — An LLM produces N improved variants of the prompt (high temperature for diversity)
2. Score — The same LLM judges each variant on clarity, specificity, and effectiveness (low temperature for consistency)
3. Rank — Variants are sorted by overall score, best first

This mirrors the proposal → scoring → selection stages from the APE paper (Zhou et al., ICLR 2023), which demonstrated that LLMs can engineer prompts at human-level or better.