Installateur d'usine à code assistée par IA

VérifiéPrudence

Installe un système d'ingénierie assistée par IA en trois couches dans le projet actuel. Détecte le langage et le framework, puis crée les fichiers de configuration.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DeveloppementAvancé
1027/07/2026
Claude Code
#code-factory#engineering-setup#scaffolding#tooling#linting

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Installe un système d'ingénierie assisté par IA en trois couches dans le projet actuel, incluant des conventions d'architecture, des compétences de révision et des outils de vérification déterministes.

Points forts

  • Agnostique au langage et au framework, avec détection automatique de la stack.
  • Combine révision pilotée par IA et vérification déterministe pour une qualité de code renforcée.
  • Inclut des embeddings de code pour la détection sémantique des doublons.
  • Mode de mise à jour pour synchroniser l'installation avec l'évolution du projet.

Limites

  • Nécessite des outils externes comme /research et un temps de configuration important.
  • Les embeddings nécessitent une base de données (voyage/pgvector).
  • Peut être excessif pour de très petits projets.
Quand l'utiliser

Lors de la mise en place d'un nouveau projet ou de l'amélioration d'un existant avec une qualité de code assistée par IA et une vérification d'architecture.

Quand l'éviter

Pour des projets triviaux ou quand vous souhaitez un outillage minimal sans intégration IA.

Analyse de sécurité

Prudence
Score qualité88/100

The skill legitimately needs powerful tools like Bash and package managers to scaffold a development environment. It does not exfiltrate data or disable safety, but the dynamic installation and execution steps carry inherent risk if the research phase is compromised or the user is unaware of what is being installed.

Points d'attention
  • Uses Bash to install packages and run scripts, which could be abused if research phase returns malicious tool recommendations.
  • Skill dynamically writes and executes hook scripts, creating potential for arbitrary code execution.

Exemples

Full install
/code-factory
Update existing factory
/code-factory --update
Minimal install without embeddings
/code-factory --minimal

name: code-factory description: Install an AI-assisted engineering code factory into the current project. Language and framework agnostic — researches the right tooling for the target stack and scaffolds skills, hooks, and static enforcement. Invoke with /code-factory. disable-model-invocation: true allowed-tools: "Read Write Bash Glob Grep Agent" argument-hint: "[--update | --minimal]"

Code Factory Installer

Install a three-layer AI-assisted engineering system into the current project:

  1. CLAUDE.md / engineer skill — architecture conventions (advisory, project-specific)
  2. AI review skills — complexity, SRP, DRY, meta-check (LLM review at Stop hook)
  3. Deterministic enforcement — linter, formatter, architecture rules, import boundaries (always-on, blocking)

Plus: code embeddings for semantic DRY detection, whitelist for accepted violations, code factory skills for scaffolding new modules.

Modes

  • Default (no args) — full install. Detects language + framework, researches right tools, creates all files.
  • --update — re-detect and update existing installations to match current state of the codebase
  • --minimal — skip code embeddings (no voyage/pgvector setup). Useful if the project is too small to justify them.

Phase 1: Detect the target stack

  1. Identify the primary language:

    • Python: pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, setup.py
    • JavaScript/TypeScript: package.json
    • Go: go.mod
    • Rust: Cargo.toml
    • Java/Kotlin: build.gradle, pom.xml
    • Ruby: Gemfile
    • Elixir: mix.exs
  2. Identify the framework (if any):

    • Python: Litestar, FastAPI, Django, Flask
    • TS: Next.js, NestJS, Express, Fastify, Hono
    • Go: Gin, Echo, Fiber, chi
    • Rust: axum, actix, rocket
    • Java: Spring Boot, Micronaut, Quarkus
  3. Identify the package manager:

    • Python: uv, poetry, pip
    • JS: npm, pnpm, yarn, bun
    • Go: go modules
    • Rust: cargo
  4. Identify testing framework already in use.

  5. Write findings to .claude/code-factory-stack.md for reference.

Phase 2: Research language-specific tooling

You must use /research (the multi-source research skill) to find current best-in-class tools for the target language. Do NOT guess. Research these:

  1. Linter + formatter (fast, sub-second on edits):

    • What is the Ruff equivalent? (Python: ruff, TS: biome/eslint+prettier, Go: gofmt+golangci-lint, Rust: rustfmt+clippy, Ruby: rubocop, Java: checkstyle/spotless)
  2. Architecture enforcement (layer/import rules):

    • What is the import-linter equivalent? (Python: import-linter, TS: dependency-cruiser/eslint-plugin-boundaries, Java: ArchUnit, Go: go-arch-lint/dep)
  3. Complexity rules (cyclomatic, cognitive):

    • What rules exist in the linter for branches/statements/complexity?
  4. Testing:

    • Standard testing framework + HTTP client for integration tests
    • Whether query-counting fixtures / N+1 detection tooling exists
  5. Duplicate detection (beyond embeddings):

    • jscpd, PMD CPD equivalents
  6. Empirical Big O:

    • bigO (Python), hyperfine (any), criterion (Rust), benchmark.js (JS)

Phase 3: Install dependencies

Install the language-specific tools via the project's package manager. Never skip this — deterministic enforcement is the most important layer.

Phase 4: Scaffold the factory files

Create the following in the target project (adapted per language):

.claude/skills/engineer/SKILL.md

Project-specific architecture skill. See templates/engineer.spec.md for the required structure and placeholders. Uses paths: to auto-load when editing source files.

.claude/skills/complexity-check/SKILL.md

Copy as-is from templates/complexity-check.md. Inside, substitute the linter invocation command with the language's equivalent (researched in Phase 2).

.claude/skills/srp-check/SKILL.md

Copy as-is from templates/srp-check.md. Language-independent — the check is pure LLM prompt.

.claude/skills/dry-check/SKILL.md

Copy as-is from templates/dry-check.md. Replace the hook script path in the skill body with the target language's script extension.

.claude/skills/dead-code-check/SKILL.md

Copy as-is from templates/dead-code-check.md. The guardrails section at the end lists language-specific false-positive patterns; retain the block matching the target language and remove the rest.

.claude/skills/benchmark/SKILL.md

Copy from templates/benchmark.md. Replace the bigO-specific example block with the language's equivalent benchmarking library (criterion for Rust, hyperfine for CLI, benchmark.js for JS, JMH for Java, go test -bench for Go).

.claude/skills/new-model/SKILL.md and .claude/skills/new-step/SKILL.md

Code factory skills. See templates/factory-skills.spec.md for the abstract structure. Write language-appropriate versions; reference references/python-litestar/new-model.md for a concrete example.

.claude/whitelist.yaml

Copy as-is from templates/whitelist.yaml. YAML format is language-independent.

.claude/hooks/check-imports.<ext>

Architecture enforcement script. See templates/check-imports.spec.md for the interface contract. Write in whatever language fits the project. Reference references/python-litestar/check-imports.sh.

.claude/hooks/code_embeddings.<ext>

Function extractor + voyage-code-3 indexer. See templates/code-embeddings.spec.md for interface and schema. Use the target language's tree-sitter grammar. Reference references/python-litestar/code_embeddings.py.

.claude/hooks/whitelist.<ext>

Whitelist loader (reads .claude/whitelist.yaml). Simple utility — use whatever language fits. Reference references/python-litestar/whitelist.py.

.claude/settings.json

Hook wiring. See templates/settings.spec.md for structure and per-language command substitutions. Reference references/python-litestar/settings.json.

Project-level config

Add linter config with the research-recommended rules (complexity, unused imports, formatting) to the project's standard config file (pyproject.toml, package.json, .eslintrc, golangci.yml, Cargo.toml, etc.). Add architecture rule config (import-linter contracts, dependency-cruiser config, ArchUnit tests, etc.).

Phase 5: Verify

Run all static checks on the existing codebase:

  • Linter: report any findings but don't block installation
  • Architecture rules: report violations, ask user to fix or whitelist
  • Run any existing tests to confirm we didn't break the toolchain

Phase 6: Update CLAUDE.md

If CLAUDE.md exists, append or update:

  • Reference to .claude/skills/engineer/SKILL.md
  • Reference to the code-factory tooling
  • Key commands added (uv, npm, go, etc.)

If not, create a minimal one.

Dependencies

Required API keys:

  • VOYAGE_API_KEY — for code embeddings (skip with --minimal)

Required local tools:

  • git
  • Language-specific package manager (detected in Phase 1)
  • jq (for hook JSON parsing)
  • For Python: pgvector extension on Postgres (if using embeddings)

When to Use

  • Starting a new project — full install
  • Joining an existing project — /code-factory to bootstrap AI tooling
  • After a major refactor — /code-factory --update to re-sync

Philosophy

The three layers are complementary:

  • CLAUDE.md + engineer skill: advisory knowledge. LLM reads and follows (usually).
  • AI check skills: LLM review layer. Catches judgment-call issues (SRP, algorithmic intent).
  • Deterministic enforcement: shell/lint scripts that cannot be ignored. Catches mechanical violations.

Each layer is necessary. None is sufficient alone. CLAUDE.md alone = hoping Claude remembers. Linters alone = no judgment. AI reviews alone = no hard guarantees.

Reference Implementation

The first implementation was for a Python/Litestar project at /Users/jarekbird/aprative/electrical-floorplan-back. You can read its .claude/ directory as a complete working example before adapting to a new language.

Skills similaires