---

activation_code: CODE_REVIEW_GATE_V1 phase: 8 prerequisites:

• Phase 7 implementation complete
• Tests passing
• Coverage thresholds met outputs:
• Code review report
• .signals/code-review-complete.json description: | Human code review gate for critical components. Activates automatically for security-sensitive paths, high-complexity code, or large changes.

Activation trigger: [ACTIVATE:CODE_REVIEW_GATE_V1]

Code Review Gate Skill

Purpose

This skill provides a human code review gate between implementation (Phase 7) and integration testing (Phase 9). It ensures that code quality, security, and maintainability are validated by human eyes before proceeding.

When This Gate Triggers

Automatic Triggers (Cannot Skip)

1. Security-Sensitive Paths

   • src/auth/ - Authentication logic
   • src/security/ - Security utilities
   • src/crypto/ - Cryptographic operations
   • api/ - API endpoints
   • services/ - External service integrations

2. High Complexity Code

   • Any function with cyclomatic complexity > 15
   • Files with > 500 lines
   • Functions with > 50 lines

3. Large Changes

   • 10 files modified in a phase

   • 500 lines added/modified

Manual Triggers

• User says "review code" or "code review"
• User says "check my implementation"
• Activated via /code-review command

Review Checklist

Security Review

• [ ] No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
• [ ] Input validation on all external inputs
• [ ] Output encoding to prevent XSS
• [ ] SQL queries use parameterized statements
• [ ] Authentication checks on protected routes
• [ ] Authorization checks for resource access
• [ ] Sensitive data not logged
• [ ] HTTPS enforced for external calls

Code Quality Review

• [ ] Functions have single responsibility
• [ ] No code duplication (DRY)
• [ ] Meaningful variable/function names
• [ ] Complex logic has comments explaining WHY
• [ ] Error handling is appropriate
• [ ] No silent failures (catch without action)
• [ ] Resource cleanup (files, connections, etc.)

Architecture Review

• [ ] Follows layer boundaries (L0-L5)
• [ ] Dependencies flow downward only
• [ ] Interface contracts respected
• [ ] No circular dependencies
• [ ] Separation of concerns maintained

Test Coverage Review

• [ ] Critical paths have 100% coverage
• [ ] Edge cases are tested
• [ ] Error paths are tested
• [ ] Assertions are meaningful (not just execution)
• [ ] No mocks in production code

Documentation Review

• [ ] Public functions have docstrings/JSDoc
• [ ] Complex algorithms are explained
• [ ] API changes documented
• [ ] README updated if needed

Review Process

Step 1: Gather Changes

# Show all files changed in this phase
git diff --stat HEAD~10..HEAD

# Show detailed diff
git diff HEAD~10..HEAD

# List files by complexity (if radon available)
radon cc -s src/

Step 2: Analyze Risk

The skill analyzes changes and categorizes them:

| Category | Action | Blocking | |----------|--------|----------| | Security-critical | Must review all changes | YES | | High-complexity | Must review flagged functions | YES | | API changes | Must review contracts | YES | | Internal changes | Spot-check recommended | NO |

Step 3: Present to Human

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  CODE REVIEW REQUIRED
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Trigger: Security-sensitive files modified

Files for Review:
  1. src/auth/login.py (52 lines added)
     - New authentication logic
     - Complexity: 8/10
     - Security: HIGH PRIORITY

  2. src/auth/tokens.py (34 lines added)
     - JWT token handling
     - Complexity: 5/10
     - Security: HIGH PRIORITY

  3. api/users.py (78 lines added)
     - User CRUD operations
     - Complexity: 6/10
     - Security: MEDIUM PRIORITY

Review Checklist:
  [ ] Security review completed
  [ ] Code quality acceptable
  [ ] Architecture boundaries respected
  [ ] Test coverage verified

Actions:
  - "approve" - Proceed to Phase 6
  - "reject [reason]" - Return to implementation
  - "comment [file:line] [note]" - Add review comment
  - "show [file]" - Display file contents
  - "diff [file]" - Show file diff
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Step 4: Human Decision

Approve:

approve

✅ CODE REVIEW APPROVED
Proceeding to Phase 9 (Integration Testing)
[SIGNAL:CODE_REVIEW_COMPLETE]
[ACTIVATE:INTEGRATION_VALIDATOR_V1]

Reject:

reject Security: Missing input validation on user_id parameter in api/users.py:45

❌ CODE REVIEW REJECTED
Reason: Security: Missing input validation on user_id parameter in api/users.py:45

Returning to Phase 7 for fixes.
Please address the review feedback and re-submit.

Add Comment:

comment src/auth/login.py:23 Consider using constant-time comparison for password check

📝 Comment added to review log
Continue with: approve | reject | more comments

Output Files

Review Report

.claude/reports/code-review-report.json:

{
  "phase": 5.5,
  "timestamp": "2025-12-19T12:00:00Z",
  "status": "approved",
  "reviewer": "human",
  "trigger": "security_sensitive_paths",
  "files_reviewed": 3,
  "security_items": 2,
  "complexity_items": 1,
  "comments": [
    {
      "file": "src/auth/login.py",
      "line": 23,
      "comment": "Consider using constant-time comparison for password check"
    }
  ],
  "checklist": {
    "security": true,
    "code_quality": true,
    "architecture": true,
    "test_coverage": true,
    "documentation": true
  }
}

Completion Signal

.claude/.signals/code-review-complete.json:

{
  "phase": 8,
  "status": "approved",
  "timestamp": "2025-12-19T12:00:00Z",
  "next_phase": 9,
  "trigger_next": true
}

Configuration

In config/quality-rules.json:

{
  "code_review_gate": {
    "enabled": true,
    "trigger_on": {
      "security_sensitive_paths": [
        "src/auth/",
        "src/security/",
        "api/"
      ],
      "high_complexity_threshold": 15,
      "file_changes_threshold": 10
    }
  }
}

To disable for a project:

{
  "code_review_gate": {
    "enabled": false
  }
}

Bypass (Emergency Only)

For emergency situations only, the gate can be bypassed:

bypass-review --reason "Production hotfix for CVE-2025-XXXXX" --ticket JIRA-1234

Bypass requirements:

• Must provide reason
• Must provide ticket/tracking number
• Logged to audit trail
• Triggers post-deployment review

Integration with Pipeline

Phase 7: TDD Implementation
    ↓
Phase 8: Code Review Gate (NEW)
    ├─ Automatic for security/complexity triggers
    ├─ Human reviews code
    └─ Approve/Reject decision
    ↓
Phase 9: Integration Testing

See Also

• hooks/code-quality-validator.sh - Automated quality checks
• config/quality-rules.json - Quality thresholds
• skills/prd-audit/SKILL.md - PRD quality audit