Équipe de Build Coordonnée

VérifiéSûr

Lance une équipe coordonnée de quatre agents IA (chercheur, planificateur, développeur, vérificateur) travaillant en parallèle sur une tâche de développement de fonctionnalité. Le chercheur étudie le domaine, le planificateur conçoit un plan d'action, le développeur implémente le code, et le vérificateur revoit le résultat. Idéal pour les fonctionnalités complexes nécessitant un développement structuré en plusieurs étapes avec révision intégrée.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DeveloppementIntermédiaire
9002/06/2026
Claude Code
#team-build#parallel-development#agent-teams#feature-development

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Lance une équipe de développement composée de quatre agents spécialisés (chercheur, planificateur, développeur, vérificateur) pour travailler en parallèle sur une fonctionnalité.

Points forts

  • Coordination automatique des rôles complémentaires
  • Réduction du temps de développement grâce au parallélisme
  • Intégration de la recherche et de la révision dès le départ

Limites

  • Nécessite une structure de projet prédéfinie (dossiers Library, Dashboard, AgentTeam)
  • Les dépendances entre agents peuvent ralentir si la communication n'est pas fluide
  • Ne convient pas aux tâches très simples ou triviales
Quand l'utiliser

Utilisez cette compétence pour des tâches de développement complexes nécessitant recherche, conception, implémentation et revue coordonnées.

Quand l'éviter

Évitez pour des modifications mineures ou des tâches qui peuvent être réalisées par un seul agent sans coordination.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité92/100

The skill orchestrates sub-agents for software development using legitimate tools (Read, Write, Bash, etc.). It does not contain destructive commands, exfiltration, or obfuscation. While Bash is powerful, its usage is for standard build tasks, and the skill itself does not instruct harmful actions.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Exemples

Add user authentication with JWT
/summon-team-build Add user authentication with JWT tokens
Refactor database layer for PostgreSQL
/summon-team-build Refactor the database layer for PostgreSQL support
Create REST API for task management
/summon-team-build Create a REST API for the task management feature

name: summon-team-build description: Launch a build team (Fetcher + Planner + Builder + Checker) for parallel feature development allowed-tools:

  • Task
  • Read
  • Write
  • Edit
  • Bash
  • Glob
  • Grep

/summon-team-build - Build Team

Launch a coordinated build team: Fetcher studies the domain, Planner designs, Builder implements, Checker reviews — working in parallel as Agent Teams teammates.

Usage

/summon-team-build <task description>

Examples

/summon-team-build Add user authentication with JWT tokens
/summon-team-build Refactor the database layer for PostgreSQL support
/summon-team-build Create a REST API for the task management feature

Instructions

When invoked, you are the Team Lead (Orca). Spawn four teammates to work on the given task.

Step 1: Understand the Task

Read these files for context:

  • Dashboard/Brief.md — current project state
  • Library/Rules.md — project constraints
  • Any files the user references

Step 2: Spawn Teammates

Launch four teammates using the Task tool. Each teammate gets a detailed prompt that includes:

  1. Their identity — tell them to read their identity file first
  2. Shared context — tell them CLAUDE.md is auto-loaded and to follow its protocols
  3. Their specific assignment — what they need to do for this task
  4. Output location — where to put their deliverables
  5. Coordination notes — what the other teammates are doing

Teammate 0: Fetcher (LEARN FIRST)

You are Fetcher — The Researcher.

READ FIRST:
- Your identity: Library/Fetcher/Fetcher_Identity.md
- Your knowledge: Library/Knowledge/Fetcher/README.md
- CLAUDE.md is auto-loaded (shared protocols)

YOUR TASK:
Research what's needed to build: [TASK DESCRIPTION]

DELIVERABLE:
1. Check Library/Sources/ for existing relevant research
2. If gaps exist, use WebSearch and WebFetch to gather sources
3. Save new sources to Library/Sources/[topic-slug]/ with README.md index
4. Write a brief study file to Dashboard/Work_Space/[Feature]_Study.md covering:
   - Key technical considerations
   - Existing patterns and best practices
   - Pitfalls to avoid
   - Recommended approach with sources

COORDINATION:
- Planner will use your research to design the blueprint
- Builder will reference it during implementation
- You start FIRST — the team learns before it builds

Teammate 1: Planner

You are Planner — The Architect.

READ FIRST:
- Your identity: AgenTeam/Planner/Planner_Identity.md
- Your knowledge: Library/Knowledge/Planner/README.md
- CLAUDE.md is auto-loaded (shared protocols)

YOUR TASK:
Create a blueprint for: [TASK DESCRIPTION]

Read Fetcher's study file at Dashboard/Work_Space/[Feature]_Study.md when available — use the research to inform your design.

DELIVERABLE:
Write your blueprint to Dashboard/Work_Space/BLUEPRINT_[feature].md

Include:
- Architecture decisions and rationale
- File structure and components
- Implementation phases (ordered steps)
- Dependencies and risks
- Acceptance criteria

COORDINATION:
- Fetcher is researching the domain — incorporate their findings
- Builder will implement from your blueprint
- Checker will review the implementation
- Keep the blueprint actionable — Builder needs clear steps

Teammate 2: Builder

You are Builder — The Developer.

READ FIRST:
- Your identity: AgenTeam/Builder/Builder_Identity.md
- Your knowledge: Library/Knowledge/Builder/README.md
- CLAUDE.md is auto-loaded (shared protocols)

YOUR TASK:
Implement: [TASK DESCRIPTION]

Wait for Planner's blueprint at Dashboard/Work_Space/BLUEPRINT_[feature].md before starting implementation. If the blueprint isn't ready yet, read the task description and begin scaffolding the file structure.

DELIVERABLE:
Working code in the appropriate project location.

COORDINATION:
- Planner is creating the blueprint — follow it
- Checker will review your code — write clean, documented code
- Flag any blueprint issues back to the team

Teammate 3: Checker

You are Checker — QA & Security.

READ FIRST:
- Your identity: AgenTeam/Checker/Checker_Identity.md
- Your knowledge: Library/Knowledge/Checker/README.md
- CLAUDE.md is auto-loaded (shared protocols)

YOUR TASK:
Review the implementation of: [TASK DESCRIPTION]

Wait for Builder to complete implementation. While waiting, review Planner's blueprint for:
- Security concerns
- Missing edge cases
- Architecture issues

DELIVERABLE:
Write your review to Dashboard/Work_Space/REVIEW_[feature].md

Include:
- Security assessment (OWASP top 10 check)
- Code quality assessment
- Test coverage gaps
- Verdict: APPROVED / NEEDS CHANGES (with specific items)

COORDINATION:
- Planner created the blueprint
- Builder implemented the code
- Your review is the quality gate before merge

Step 3: Monitor Progress

As Team Lead:

  • Watch the shared task list (Ctrl+T to toggle)
  • If teammates get stuck or conflict, step in to clarify
  • Synthesize results when all four finish

Step 4: Report to User

When the team finishes, present:

=== BUILD TEAM COMPLETE ===

BLUEPRINT: [summary of Planner's design]
IMPLEMENTATION: [summary of what Builder created]
REVIEW: [Checker's verdict + any issues]

Files created/modified:
- [list of files]

Next steps:
- [any remaining items]
===========================

Notes

  • All four teammates run in parallel — Fetcher starts research immediately, Planner starts immediately, Builder and Checker wait for upstream work
  • Teammates share files through Dashboard/Work_Space/ (file-based coordination)
  • The user (Pilot-in-Command) has final approval on all deliverables
  • If the task is small, consider whether you really need all four — sometimes just Builder + Checker is enough
Skills similaires