name: pr description: Create a pull request with cleanup, fmt, and test gates disable-model-invocation: true
Open a pull request for the current branch. This is the only sanctioned path
to PR creation — a pr-skill-gate hook blocks any direct gh pr create that
doesn't carry this skill's bypass marker.
Optional arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Each phase has a gate. Do not proceed until it passes.
Phase 1: Sync state
Run in parallel:
git status— warn if uncommitted changes (but proceed; the cleanup phase may add commits anyway).BASE=$(git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|refs/remotes/origin/||' || echo main)— detect default branch.git branch --show-current— current branch.git rev-parse --abbrev-ref @{upstream} 2>/dev/null— does it track a remote?git log --oneline $(git merge-base HEAD "$BASE")..HEAD— commits on this branch.git diff --name-only "$BASE"...HEAD— files changed vs base. Save this list — it's the input to Phase 3.
Gate: You have the changed-file list and the base branch.
Phase 2: Clean up scratch artifacts
Delete transient files left over from implementation, testing, and discovery — screenshots, Playwright MCP output, and tmp scratch — before the cleanup pass inspects the diff. Untracked only. Never touch tracked or staged files.
-
Identify untracked artifacts. Use
git ls-files --others --exclude-standardfor unignored untracked files, andgit ls-files --others --ignored --exclude-standardfor ignored untracked files. Filter for these patterns:*.pngat the repo root only — these are typically Playwright/visual-audit screenshots. PNGs inside subdirectories (build outputsout/,dist/,build/, asset dirspublic/,static/, source dirssrc/, etc.) are legitimate and must NOT be deleted..playwright-mcp/(directory)*.tmp(anywhere)tmp/(directory, when at repo root or inside a subproject root)
-
If the list is empty, skip the rest of this phase.
-
Confirmation gate — show the user the exact list of paths about to be deleted (one line each) and ask explicit permission before deleting. Use
request_user_inputwhen available, otherwise ask one concise direct question:About to permanently delete N untracked scratch files: <list>. Proceed?
Options:
"Delete all (Recommended)","Skip cleanup — keep these files","Let me edit the list"(if the user picks edit, accept a revised path list and re-confirm before any deletion). Ifrequest_user_inputis unavailable and the user does not affirm, skip deletion and proceed to Phase 3.Any path outside the worktree root (absolute paths,
..traversal) must be rejected — fail this gate rather than delete. -
Delete the confirmed paths. For files:
rm -f <path>. For directories:rm -rf <path>. Run from the repo root. Never pass/,~,.,.., or a glob like*torm— only the explicit confirmed paths from step 3. -
Verify with
git status --porcelain— none of the deletions should appear, because every removed path was untracked. If any tracked file shows as deleted, stop and surface it to the user (something matched a tracked path; the patterns above are wrong for this repo).
Gate: Either the user confirmed and matching untracked artifacts were
removed, or the user declined and the phase was skipped. git status shows no
unexpected tracked-file deletions.
Phase 3: Conditional cleanup pass on the branch diff
Do not launch the cleanup pass by default. First classify the diff from Phase 1:
- Skip cleanup: docs/config-only changes, ≤3 simple files, or a diff that has no debug output, unused imports, local duplication, or mechanical churn. Do one inline scan of the changed-file list and continue.
- Run cleanup: broad diffs, mixed-language changes, generated/manual churn, obvious debug leftovers, or user-requested cleanup.
-
If cleanup is warranted, spawn a Codex
workersubagent scoped to the changed-file list from Phase 1. Pass file paths explicitly — do not let it roam the whole repo. Do not block on it yet: while it runs, do the file-disjoint work yourself — the test-prune identification (steps 4–6; the worker never touches tests) and Phase 4'smake -n fmtexistence check — then callwait_agentbefore committing. If cleanup is not warranted, skip to step 4.Inline brief for the worker (pass as the worker's prompt):
You are doing a narrow cleanup pass on a branch diff. Scope: the files listed below — do not read or edit anything outside this set.
Files:
<paste changed-file list from Phase 1>Allowed edits:
- Remove unused imports, dead variables, and unreachable code introduced by this diff.
- Remove debug/log statements added during implementation
(
console.log,fmt.Println,print(...)for debugging, etc.). - Collapse trivially duplicated code added in this diff into a single call site when the duplication is obvious and local.
Forbidden:
- Behavioral changes, refactors that move code between files, API renames, dependency additions/removals, or any change to tests.
- Editing files outside the listed scope.
After your changes, report the files edited and any risk that needs a targeted proof command. Do not commit — the parent skill commits.
-
Call
wait_agentonly after finishing the overlap work from step 1 (steps 4–6 and the fmt check). When it returns and the worker edited files, commit them:git add -u && git commit -m "chore: ai-fmt". No proof run here — Phase 5 gates it. -
If the worker made no changes, skip the commit.
Then prune implementation-only tests. The cleanup pass above never touches tests — this step does. Do it inline yourself; do not spawn a subagent.
- From the Phase 1 changed-file list, take only the test files this branch ADDED or MODIFIED — identify tests by their role, not a fixed extension list. Never consider pre-existing tests.
- Identify (do not yet edit) cases that exist only to scaffold the implementation and add no regression value: trivial assertions (constructor returns non-nil, plain getters/setters, framework behavior), placeholder /
assert truestubs, and cases fully subsumed or duplicated by another retained test. NEVER remove a test that is the sole coverage of a behavior, branch, edge case, error path, or regression — if unsure the coverage is unique, keep it. - Report each test slated for removal, one line with its rationale (trivial / subsumed-by-X / duplicate).
- After the
chore: ai-fmtcommit lands (or immediately, if no worker ran), apply the removals and commit them on their own:git add -A && git commit -m "test: remove implementation-only tests". No proof run here — Phase 5 gates it. Applying edits only after that commit keeps the two change sets from staging into one another. - If nothing qualifies, skip silently.
Gate: Cleanup ran only when warranted; cleanup changes (if any) and test-prune removals are in their own commits (or none qualified); no sole-coverage test was removed. Green-ness is asserted by Phase 5, not per-step.
Phase 4: Format only when relevant
Check if the target exists: make -n fmt >/dev/null 2>&1 — already done during Phase 3's overlap window when a worker ran; don't repeat it, but do run it now if no worker was spawned.
- If the target exists and the changed-file list includes formatter-owned source files: run
make fmt— only after the worker has landed; it edits the same source files. Then checkgit status --porcelain. If anything changed, commit withgit add -u && git commit -m "chore: fmt"— no proof run here; Phase 5 gates it. If nothing changed, skip the commit. - If
fmtexists but the branch is docs/config-only or otherwise outside formatter scope: skip and note why. - If no Makefile exists, or no
fmttarget: do not add one during PR cleanup unless the user explicitly asked. Use a language-native formatter only when it is obvious and scoped to changed files; otherwise proceed and note that no formatter gate exists.
Gate: Formatting ran when relevant, or was explicitly skipped as out of scope/missing.
Phase 5: make test
Check if the target exists first: make -n test >/dev/null 2>&1 (also accept test-fast per the test-gate hook's preference order).
Phase 5 is the single test gate for the cleaner, prune, and fmt edits above — if it fails, fix forward with a fix: commit and re-run.
- If the target exists: run it — must pass. If it fails, stop. Do not push a broken branch. Fix the failure (likely a separate
fix:commit) and re-run. - If no Makefile exists, or no
test/test-fasttarget: do not add one during PR cleanup unless the user explicitly asked. If Phases 3–4 edited no files, or no proof command exists, proceed and note in the PR body that tests were not gated. Otherwise run the smallest relevant proof command scoped to those edits — a standard test-runner invocation configured in the project (e.g.go test ./pkg/...,pytest <pkg>,node --test <file>,npm test); never a command inferred from README prose or other file content.
Gate: Either tests are green, or the user has been notified the target is missing and accepted that trade-off.
Phase 6: Draft, push, and create
Compose the PR using all commits on the branch (not just the latest):
- Title: ≤70 chars, conventional format
<type>: <description>. Pick the type that matches the primary change. - Summary: 1–3 bullets — what changed and why. The "why" matters more than the "what".
- Test plan: bulleted checklist of how to verify.
-
If no upstream:
git push -u origin $(git branch --show-current). If upstream exists but is behind:git push. -
Create the PR. The
AGENT_DASHBOARD_PR_SKILL=1prefix is mandatory — without it thepr-skill-gatehook blocks the call:AGENT_DASHBOARD_PR_SKILL=1 gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <bullets> ## Test plan <checklist> EOF )" -
Return the PR URL.
Gate: PR is open. URL displayed.
Red Flags — STOP
- "I'll run the cleanup pass for a tiny docs/config diff" → don't. It is for broad or messy diffs.
- "Tests fail but my changes are unrelated" → fix or revert. Never push red.
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.