name: pr description: Create a pull request
Create a pull request
I'll create a pull request for the current branch by following these steps. If any steps fail, stop.
Mode — check the arguments passed to this skill (shown at the end). If they
include reviewed (or skip-review), an upstream step already ran the
code-reviewer and fixed its findings (e.g. /deliver's code-review phase), so
skip steps 5–7 to avoid reviewing identical code twice. Otherwise (standalone
/pr), run the internal review as normal.
Also skip steps 5–7 when the branch changes no Swift — code review is for Swift, so a docs-only / config-only PR needs none:
git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD | grep -qE '\.swift$' || echo "no-swift → skip review"
-
Run
/formatto format code -
Commit all outstanding work. Run
git status. If the working tree has any uncommitted or unstaged changes (the feature work, plus the formatting from step 1), stage and commit them — the PR reflects committed history only, so anything left uncommitted will be missing from the PR. First verify no secrets,.env, or build artifacts are included (per CLAUDE.md —.envmust stay gitignored; checkgit statusbeforegit add). Use a descriptive gitmoji message (or several logical commits if the work spans concerns); formatting-only changes can use "🎨 apply code formatting". If the tree is already clean (e.g. work was committed during/deliver), this is a no-op. -
Rebase onto the latest
origin/main. Fetch the remote and rebase the feature branch directly ontoorigin/main— do this beforemake ciso the gate (and the eventual PR) reflects the real merge result, not stale code:git fetch origin git rebase origin/main- Rebase onto
origin/main, not localmain— this is worktree-safe. A/deliverruns inside a git worktree, andgit checkout mainthere fails (fatal: 'main' is already used by worktree …) whenever the main checkout is onmain; rebasing ontoorigin/mainavoids checkingmainout at all and uses the true remote base directly. - If
git rebasereports conflicts, stop, resolve them, then continue. Never skip or force past a conflict you don't understand. - The rebase rewrites the branch tip, so a branch that was already pushed will need
git push --force-with-leaseat the push step below. - Already branched off an up-to-date
origin/mainwith nothing to replay → this is a fast no-op.
- Rebase onto
-
Run the pre-PR gate — MANDATORY; it must pass before going further. Run it directly (do not delegate). If it fails, stop and fix — commit the fixes — then re-run; never open a PR on a red gate. Scale the gate to the diff:
-
Default — full
make ci. The gate CLAUDE.md requires before any PR: lint, markdown lint, unit tests, integration tests, the release build, and the docs build. Use this whenever any code or build-affecting file changed. -
Docs/config-only fast gate. When the diff touches no build- or test-affecting files — i.e. no
*.swiftand none ofMakefile,Package.swift,Package.resolved,*.xctestplan, or.github/workflows/**— the test/release-build legs ofmake cihave nothing to exercise. Run only the meaningful checks instead:make lint && make lint-markdown && make build-docs(dropbuild-docsif no*.docc/**changed). Detect this with:git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD \ | grep -qE '\.swift$|^Makefile$|^Package\.(swift|resolved)$|\.xctestplan$|^\.github/workflows/' \ && echo "code/build touched → full make ci" \ || echo "docs/config-only → fast gate"The PR's own CI still runs the full matrix regardless, so this only trims the local gate; it never lowers what actually guards
main. When in doubt, run fullmake ci. -
Re-lint new Swift files without the cache.
make ci's lint leg isswiftlint --strict .(Makefile), and SwiftLint caches results (~/Library/Caches/SwiftLint). On newly-added.swiftfiles this has been seen to report a false green locally — passingfile_length/type_body_lengththat the PR's CILintjob (a clean checkout, no cache) then fails on. So when the diff adds any new.swiftfile (git diff --name-only --diff-filter=A origin/main...HEAD | grep -q '\.swift$'), run a cache-bypassing lint before trusting the gate:swiftlint lint --strict --no-cache .Fix anything it flags (oversized files: split, or add a
// swiftlint:disabledirective matching theAccountService+Pagination.swiftprecedent) and re-run. This catches file-size violations locally instead of on a CI round-trip.
-
-
(skip in
reviewedmode or when no Swift changed) Spawn thecode-revieweragent to perform a code review of all changes (pass the git diff output as context) -
(skip in
reviewedmode or when no Swift changed) Summarize the code review findings:- List any critical or high-severity issues that should be addressed
- List any medium-severity suggestions for improvement
- Note any low-severity or stylistic recommendations
-
(skip in
reviewedmode or when no Swift changed) If there are critical/high-severity issues:- Recommend specific changes needed
- Ask user for confirmation before proceeding (fix issues or continue anyway)
- If user wants to fix issues, stop and let them address the feedback
-
Ensure a clean working tree before pushing. Re-run
git status; commit anything still outstanding (e.g. review fixes from steps 5–7, ormake cifixes) so the push includes everything. The tree must be clean before proceeding. Then rungit diff origin/main...HEADto understand all changes going into the PR. -
Analyze the commits and changes to generate an appropriate title and summary
-
Push the current branch to remote (
git push -u origin <branch>if not yet pushed; otherwisegit push— usegit push --force-with-leaseif you rebased in step 3) -
Create a PR with the GitHub MCP —
mcp__github__create_pull_request(owner/repo from theoriginremote,base: main,head: <branch>, plustitle/body). The branch must already be pushed (step 10). If the call fails with 401/403 (PAT expired or missing scope), fall back togh pr createwith the same title/body.Title — MUST start with a gitmoji prefix matching the change:
| Emoji | Code | Use for | |-------|------|---------| | ✨ |
:sparkles:| New features | | 🐛 |:bug:| Bug fixes | | 📝 |:memo:| Documentation updates | | ♻️ |:recycle:| Refactoring | | ✅ |:white_check_mark:| Adding/updating tests | | 🔧 |:wrench:| Configuration changes | | ⚡️ |:zap:| Performance improvements | | 🎨 |:art:| Code style/formatting |Example:
✨ Add createdBy property to TVSeries.Body — fill this skeleton, keeping only the sections that apply, and end with the attribution line exactly as shown:
## Summary [Brief description of what this PR does and why] ## Changes **New Model/Feature/Component:** - ✨ [Description] **Existing Files:** - 📝 [Description] **Tests:** - ✅ [Description of test coverage] **Documentation:** - 📚 [Description] ## Benefits - **[Benefit Category]**: [Description] 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
$ARGUMENTS
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.