Notre avis
Automatise la validation de la qualité du code avant un commit, en exécutant des outils de linting et de typage, et en affichant les résultats bruts pour décision humaine.
Points forts
- Correction automatique des problèmes corrigeables (formatage, lint) et ré-indexation des fichiers modifiés
- Validation spécifique aux fichiers indexés, évitant les fausses alertes
- Prise en charge de Python, Shell et Markdown avec outils adaptés
Limites
- Ne remplace pas une décision humaine : l'agent doit interpréter les sorties pour décider de la validité
- Dépend de l'installation locale des outils (ruff, mypy, shellcheck, etc.)
- Ne gère pas les conflits de merge ni les validations avancées de tests
Utilisez-le avant chaque commit pour garantir que seuls du code nettoyé et vérifié est intégré au dépôt.
Évitez-le lorsque vous avez besoin de valider des modifications non encore indexées ou dans des projets sans outils de linting/typage configurés.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThe skill runs a curated validation script for code quality checks before committing. It uses predefined, reputable tools (ruff, mypy, shellcheck) in a safe manner, without downloading or executing untrusted code. No destructive or exfiltrating actions are instructed.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
Stage all modified Python and shell files, then run safe commit validation to auto-fix issues and show me the results.Run safe commit on staged changes, fix any errors found, and commit with a conventional message explaining the change.Use safe commit to validate my staged changes, paying attention to any sensitive file warnings before committing.name: safe-commit description: Validate code quality and commit changes. Supports Python, Shell, and Markdown. Use for code commits. allowed-tools: [Bash, Read, Grep, AskUserQuestion]
Safe Commit
Automatically fix code quality issues and validate changes before committing.
How It Works
The script auto-fixes everything it can (formatting, fixable lint issues), then runs validators and shows you their raw output. You read the tool output directly, decide if there are problems, and proceed accordingly.
Key Philosophy: You're an intelligent agent - the script doesn't parse tool output or interpret "errors" vs "success." It just shows you what ruff, mypy, shellcheck, etc. say, and you decide.
Note on tool selection: The script prefers project-managed tools (via uv run --group dev if pyproject.toml exists) over global tools, which allows mypy to see project dependencies and validate imports properly.
Workflow
1. Stage Your Changes
IMPORTANT: Stage files before running validation:
git add <files-to-commit>
The script validates only staged changes. If you run it without staging, you'll get:
Exit code 1: No staged changes to commit
2. Run Validation
~/.claude/skills/safe-commit/safe_commit.sh
The script will:
- Auto-fix all fixable issues (formatting, auto-fixable lint errors)
- Re-stage any files that were modified during auto-fixing
- Run validators and show their full output
- Check for safety concerns (local files, sensitive files)
- Show commit size statistics
If you see MISSING_TOOLS: - Some validators are unavailable. Validation will be limited but script continues.
3. Review Output and Fix Issues
Read the validator output directly and fix any problems found:
Clean output - proceed with commit:
=== Validating: script.py ===
--- ruff check (via project env) ---
All checks passed!
--- mypy (via project env) ---
Success: no issues found in 1 source file
Errors found - fix them before committing:
=== Validating: script.py ===
--- ruff check ---
script.py:10:5: F821 Undefined name `foo`
--- mypy ---
script.py:10: error: Name 'foo' is not defined
→ Undefined variable on line 10 - edit the file to fix it, then re-run validation
Important:
- Always fix errors - Don't proceed with broken code unless you have a very good reason
- Explain any exceptions - If you skip an error, tell the user why
- Use Edit tool to fix issues, then re-stage and re-run safe-commit
Special cases:
- Local files detected → Hard block, must unstage them
- Sensitive files detected → Ask user to confirm before committing
- Auto-fixed files → Review
git diff --cachedto see what changed
4. Generate Commit Message
- Use conventional format (
feat:,fix:,refactor:,docs:,test:) - Focus on WHY, not just WHAT
- Check recent style:
git log -5 --oneline - Ask user for confirmation
5. Execute Commit
git commit -m "your message here"
What the Script Does
The script uses language-specific tools for formatting, linting, and validation:
Python:
- Auto-fix:
ruff format(formatter) +ruff check --fix(linter with auto-fix) - Validate:
ruff check(linter) +mypy(type checker)
Shell:
- Auto-fix:
shfmt -w(formatter) - Validate:
shellcheck(linter)
Markdown:
- Auto-fix:
markdownlint --fix+prettier --writeormdformat(formatters) - Validate:
markdownlint(linter)
Auto-fixes (re-stages automatically):
- All fixable issues are automatically corrected and re-staged
- Modified files are automatically added back to the staging area
Hard blocks (exits with error):
- Local files (.local.)
- No staged changes
- Not in a git repository
Shows in output (you interpret):
- Linting errors (ruff, shellcheck, markdownlint)
- Type errors (mypy)
- All other validation results
- Line-length warnings are informational - don't block on MD013 in markdown
Warns (doesn't block):
- Sensitive files (.env, credentials, .pem)
- Large commits (>300 lines)
Splitting Commits
If changes are unrelated, stage them separately:
# First commit
git add <first-group-of-files>
~/.claude/skills/safe-commit/safe_commit.sh
git commit -m "first commit"
# Second commit
git add <second-group-of-files>
~/.claude/skills/safe-commit/safe_commit.sh
git commit -m "second commit"
To unstage files already staged:
git restore --staged <unwanted-files>
Important
- Fix errors before committing - Don't proceed with broken code
- Review validator output - You interpret what tools report, but act on errors
- Never commit .local. files* - Hard blocked by script
- Always read the diff - Understand what's changing
- Check auto-fixes - Review what was automatically fixed
- Think about coherence - Should changes be in separate commits?
Troubleshooting
If the script itself seems broken or needs improvement, see TESTING.md for how to test and validate changes to the safe-commit skill.
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.