Notre avis
Génère une décomposition détaillée des tâches TDD à partir d'une conception approuvée, structurant les éléments de travail implémentables avec une approche test-first et une pyramide de tests.
Points forts
- Respecte le cycle Rouge-Vert-Refactor pour chaque tâche
- Applique la pyramide de tests (70% unitaires, 20% intégration, 10% E2E) pour équilibrer couverture et vitesse
- Produit une structure hiérarchique claire avec dépendances et critères d'acceptation
- Intègre des directives de dimensionnement des tâches pour une estimation précise
Limites
- Nécessite une conception préalablement générée et approuvée (/sdd-design)
- Assume que l'utilisateur maîtrise le workflow SDD et les outils MCP associés
- Ne couvre pas la gestion des cas d'erreur non définis dans la conception
Utilisez cette compétence après avoir approuvé la conception d'une fonctionnalité pour la transformer en un plan de tâches TDD exécutable.
Ne l'utilisez pas si la conception n'est pas finalisée ou si la fonctionnalité est triviale et ne nécessite pas de décomposition formelle.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThe skill defines a documentation workflow using internal MCP tools to read and write spec files. It does not instruct any destructive actions, external network calls, or execution of untrusted code. All operations are confined to the project's .spec directory and the tools are assumed safe.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
/sdd-tasks login/sdd-tasks payment-processingname: sdd-tasks description: Generate TDD task breakdown for SDD workflow. Use when breaking down design into implementable tasks with test-first approach. Invoked via /sdd-tasks <feature-name>.
SDD Task Breakdown Generation
Generate comprehensive TDD-based task breakdowns that translate approved designs into implementable work items.
Prerequisites
Before generating tasks:
- Design must be generated using
/sdd-design - Design phase should be approved (use
sdd-approve designMCP tool) - Review the design document in
.spec/specs/{feature}/design.md
Workflow
Step 1: Verify Prerequisites
Use sdd-status MCP tool to verify:
design.generated: truedesign.approved: true(recommended before tasks)
Step 2: Review Design
- Read
.spec/specs/{feature}/design.md - Identify all components to implement
- Note interfaces and data models
- Understand dependencies between components
Step 3: Apply TDD Workflow
For each task, follow the Red-Green-Refactor cycle:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TDD CYCLE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 1. RED ──────> Write failing test first │
│ (Test describes expected behavior) │
│ │
│ 2. GREEN ──────> Write minimal code to pass │
│ (Just enough to make test green) │
│ │
│ 3. REFACTOR ────> Clean up, maintain tests passing │
│ (Improve design without breaking) │
│ │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ REPEAT │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Step 4: Apply Test Pyramid
Structure tests following the 70/20/10 ratio:
╱╲
╱ ╲
╱ E2E╲ 10% - Critical user journeys
╱──────╲
╱ ╲
╱Integration╲ 20% - Component interactions
╱────────────╲
╱ ╲
╱ Unit Tests ╲ 70% - Individual functions
╱──────────────────╲
| Level | Coverage | Scope | Speed | |-------|----------|-------|-------| | Unit | 70% | Single function/class | Fast (ms) | | Integration | 20% | Component interactions | Medium (s) | | E2E | 10% | Full user journeys | Slow (min) |
Step 5: Generate Task Breakdown
Structure tasks hierarchically:
# Tasks: {Feature Name}
## Overview
{Summary of implementation approach}
## Task Groups
### 1. {Component/Layer Name}
#### 1.1 {Task Name}
**Type:** Unit | Integration | E2E
**Estimated Effort:** S | M | L | XL
**Dependencies:** {Task IDs}
**TDD Steps:**
1. RED: Write test for {specific behavior}
```typescript
describe('{Component}', () => {
it('should {expected behavior}', () => {
// Arrange
// Act
// Assert
});
});
- GREEN: Implement {minimal solution}
- REFACTOR: {Specific improvements}
Acceptance Criteria:
- [ ] Test passes
- [ ] Code coverage >= 80%
- [ ] No lint errors
1.2 {Next Task}
...
2. {Next Component}
...
Implementation Order
[1.1] ──> [1.2] ──> [2.1]
│
└──> [1.3] ──> [2.2]
Definition of Done
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] Code coverage >= 80%
- [ ] No lint/type errors
- [ ] Code reviewed
- [ ] Documentation updated
### Step 6: Task Sizing Guidelines
| Size | Description | Test Count | Time |
|------|-------------|------------|------|
| **S** | Single function, 1-2 tests | 1-2 | < 1 hour |
| **M** | Multiple functions, 3-5 tests | 3-5 | 1-4 hours |
| **L** | Component with integration | 5-10 | 4-8 hours |
| **XL** | Complex component, many edge cases | 10+ | 1-2 days |
### Step 7: Test-First Task Template
For each implementation task:
```markdown
#### Task {X.Y}: {Task Name}
**Component:** {ComponentName}
**Type:** Unit Test → Implementation
**Test Scenarios:**
1. Happy path: {Expected behavior when inputs are valid}
2. Edge case: {Boundary conditions}
3. Error case: {Invalid inputs, failures}
**Test Code (RED):**
```typescript
import { {Component} } from './{component}';
describe('{Component}', () => {
describe('{method}', () => {
it('should {happy path behavior}', async () => {
// Arrange
const input = { /* valid input */ };
// Act
const result = await component.method(input);
// Assert
expect(result).toEqual({ /* expected */ });
});
it('should throw when {error condition}', async () => {
// Arrange
const invalidInput = { /* invalid */ };
// Act & Assert
await expect(component.method(invalidInput))
.rejects.toThrow('{ErrorType}');
});
});
});
Implementation (GREEN): {Brief description of minimal implementation}
Refactor:
- Extract {helper function} if needed
- Apply {specific pattern}
### Step 8: Save and Execute
1. Save tasks to `.spec/specs/{feature}/tasks.md`
2. Use `sdd-approve tasks` MCP tool to mark phase complete
3. Use `sdd-spec-impl` MCP tool to execute tasks with TDD
## MCP Tool Integration
| Tool | When to Use |
|------|-------------|
| `sdd-status` | Verify design phase complete |
| `sdd-approve` | Mark tasks phase as approved |
| `sdd-spec-impl` | Execute tasks using TDD methodology |
| `sdd-quality-check` | Validate code quality during implementation |
## Quality Checklist
- [ ] All design components have corresponding tasks
- [ ] Tasks follow TDD (test first)
- [ ] Test pyramid ratio maintained (70/20/10)
- [ ] Dependencies between tasks are clear
- [ ] Each task has specific acceptance criteria
- [ ] Tasks are sized appropriately (avoid XL when possible)
- [ ] Implementation order respects dependencies
- [ ] Definition of Done is clear
## Steering Document References
Apply these steering documents during task breakdown:
| Document | Purpose | Key Application |
|----------|---------|-----------------|
| `.spec/steering/tdd-guideline.md` | Test-Driven Development | Structure all tasks using Red-Green-Refactor cycle, follow test pyramid (70/20/10) |
**Key TDD Principles for Tasks:**
1. **RED**: Every task starts with writing a failing test
2. **GREEN**: Implement minimal code to pass the test
3. **REFACTOR**: Clean up while keeping tests green
4. **Test Pyramid**: 70% unit, 20% integration, 10% E2E
## Common Anti-Patterns to Avoid
| Anti-Pattern | Problem | Solution |
|--------------|---------|----------|
| **Test After** | Missing edge cases | Always write test first |
| **Ice Cream Cone** | Too many E2E tests | Follow pyramid (70/20/10) |
| **Big Tasks** | Hard to track progress | Break into S/M sizes |
| **No Dependencies** | Blocked work | Map dependencies explicitly |
| **Vague Criteria** | Unclear completion | Specific, measurable criteria |
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.