Notre avis
Workflow de débogage structuré utilisant la méthode scientifique avec isolation des sous-agents et persistance des sessions.
Points forts
- Collecte systématique des symptômes avant investigation
- Isolation du sous-agent pour préserver le contexte principal
- Persistance des sessions pour les enquêtes longues
- Gestion des points de contrôle avec retour utilisateur
Limites
- Nécessite le support des sous-agents (Claude Code)
- Dépend de la clarté des symptômes fournis par l'utilisateur
- Peut être excessif pour des bugs simples
Idéal pour déboguer des problèmes complexes nécessitant une exploration approfondie des fichiers et des tests d'hypothèses.
Évitez pour des bugs triviaux qui peuvent être corrigés rapidement en lisant le code concerné.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThe skill only uses Bash to list files in a safe manner and spawns a debugging subagent; no destructive or exfiltration actions are instructed.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
Debug why my API returns 500 on POST /users. The endpoint worked yesterday and no changes were made to the API code.Help me debug a race condition where two concurrent requests sometimes cause duplicate entries in the database.Debug a memory leak in my Node.js server that causes OOM after ~10k requests. I suspect the caching layer but not sure.name: gsd-debug description: Structured debugging workflow with session persistence and investigation tracking allowed-tools: Task, Read, Edit, Bash argument-hint: [issue]
<objective> Debug issues using scientific method with subagent isolation.Orchestrator role: Gather symptoms, spawn gsd-debugger agent, handle checkpoints, spawn continuations.
Why subagent: Investigation burns context fast (reading files, forming hypotheses, testing). Fresh 200k context per investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction. </objective>
<context> User's issue: $ARGUMENTSCheck for active sessions:
ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved | head -5
</context>
<process>
1. Check Active Sessions
If active sessions exist AND no $ARGUMENTS:
- List sessions with status, hypothesis, next action
- User picks number to resume OR describes new issue
If $ARGUMENTS provided OR user describes new issue:
- Continue to symptom gathering
2. Gather Symptoms (if new issue)
Use AskUserQuestion for each:
- Expected behavior - What should happen?
- Actual behavior - What happens instead?
- Error messages - Any errors? (paste or describe)
- Timeline - When did this start? Ever worked?
- Reproduction - How do you trigger it?
After all gathered, confirm ready to investigate.
3. Spawn gsd-debugger Agent
Fill prompt and spawn:
<objective>
Investigate issue: {slug}
**Summary:** {trigger}
</objective>
<symptoms>
expected: {expected}
actual: {actual}
errors: {errors}
reproduction: {reproduction}
timeline: {timeline}
</symptoms>
<mode>
symptoms_prefilled: true
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
<debug_file>
Create: .planning/debug/{slug}.md
</debug_file>
Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Debug {slug}"
)
4. Handle Agent Return
If ## ROOT CAUSE FOUND:
- Display root cause and evidence summary
- Offer options:
- "Fix now" - spawn fix subagent
- "Plan fix" - suggest {{COMMAND_PREFIX}}plan-phase --gaps
- "Manual fix" - done
If ## CHECKPOINT REACHED:
- Present checkpoint details to user
- Get user response
- Spawn continuation agent (see step 5)
If ## INVESTIGATION INCONCLUSIVE:
- Show what was checked and eliminated
- Offer options:
- "Continue investigating" - spawn new agent with additional context
- "Manual investigation" - done
- "Add more context" - gather more symptoms, spawn again
5. Spawn Continuation Agent (After Checkpoint)
When user responds to checkpoint, spawn fresh agent:
<objective>
Continue debugging {slug}. Evidence is in the debug file.
</objective>
<prior_state>
Debug file: @.planning/debug/{slug}.md
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>
<mode>
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Continue debug {slug}"
)
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Active sessions checked
- [ ] Symptoms gathered (if new)
- [ ] gsd-debugger spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] Root cause confirmed before fixing </success_criteria>
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.