Notre avis
Un workflow de débogage structuré utilisant des sous-agents pour enquêter sur des problèmes, avec persistance des sessions et suivi des hypothèses.
Points forts
- Sépare l'enquête du contexte principal pour économiser les tokens
- Suit une méthode scientifique avec collecte des symptômes, formulation d'hypothèses et validation
- Permet la reprise de sessions de débogage grâce aux points de contrôle
Limites
- Dépend de la qualité des symptômes fournis par l'utilisateur
- Peut nécessiter plusieurs sous-agents successifs pour des problèmes complexes
- La persistance des sessions repose sur des fichiers locaux
Quand vous devez déboguer un problème logiciel nécessitant une investigation approfondie et structurée.
Pour des corrections rapides ou des problèmes triviaux où une simple inspection suffit.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThis skill is a debugging workflow orchestrator that spawns subagents and checks for debug files using non-destructive Bash commands (ls). No destructive commands, exfiltration, or safety bypasses are instructed.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
Debug the login endpoint returning a 500 error after I enter credentials.My app's memory usage keeps growing over time. Can you debug why?name: gsd-debug description: Structured debugging workflow with session persistence and investigation tracking allowed-tools: Task, Read, Edit, Bash argument-hint: [issue]
<objective> Debug issues using scientific method with subagent isolation.Orchestrator role: Gather symptoms, spawn gsd-debugger agent, handle checkpoints, spawn continuations.
Why subagent: Investigation burns context fast (reading files, forming hypotheses, testing). Fresh 200k context per investigation. Main context stays lean for user interaction. </objective>
<context> User's issue: $ARGUMENTSCheck for active sessions:
ls .planning/debug/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v resolved | head -5
</context>
<process>
1. Check Active Sessions
If active sessions exist AND no $ARGUMENTS:
- List sessions with status, hypothesis, next action
- User picks number to resume OR describes new issue
If $ARGUMENTS provided OR user describes new issue:
- Continue to symptom gathering
2. Gather Symptoms (if new issue)
Use AskUserQuestion for each:
- Expected behavior - What should happen?
- Actual behavior - What happens instead?
- Error messages - Any errors? (paste or describe)
- Timeline - When did this start? Ever worked?
- Reproduction - How do you trigger it?
After all gathered, confirm ready to investigate.
3. Spawn gsd-debugger Agent
Fill prompt and spawn:
<objective>
Investigate issue: {slug}
**Summary:** {trigger}
</objective>
<symptoms>
expected: {expected}
actual: {actual}
errors: {errors}
reproduction: {reproduction}
timeline: {timeline}
</symptoms>
<mode>
symptoms_prefilled: true
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
<debug_file>
Create: .planning/debug/{slug}.md
</debug_file>
Task(
prompt=filled_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Debug {slug}"
)
4. Handle Agent Return
If ## ROOT CAUSE FOUND:
- Display root cause and evidence summary
- Offer options:
- "Fix now" - spawn fix subagent
- "Plan fix" - suggest {{COMMAND_PREFIX}}plan-phase --gaps
- "Manual fix" - done
If ## CHECKPOINT REACHED:
- Present checkpoint details to user
- Get user response
- Spawn continuation agent (see step 5)
If ## INVESTIGATION INCONCLUSIVE:
- Show what was checked and eliminated
- Offer options:
- "Continue investigating" - spawn new agent with additional context
- "Manual investigation" - done
- "Add more context" - gather more symptoms, spawn again
5. Spawn Continuation Agent (After Checkpoint)
When user responds to checkpoint, spawn fresh agent:
<objective>
Continue debugging {slug}. Evidence is in the debug file.
</objective>
<prior_state>
Debug file: @.planning/debug/{slug}.md
</prior_state>
<checkpoint_response>
**Type:** {checkpoint_type}
**Response:** {user_response}
</checkpoint_response>
<mode>
goal: find_and_fix
</mode>
Task(
prompt=continuation_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-debugger",
description="Continue debug {slug}"
)
</process>
<success_criteria>
- [ ] Active sessions checked
- [ ] Symptoms gathered (if new)
- [ ] gsd-debugger spawned with context
- [ ] Checkpoints handled correctly
- [ ] Root cause confirmed before fixing </success_criteria>
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.