Orchestration des tests - Patterns

VérifiéSûr

Fournit des patrons d'orchestration pour générer, exécuter et maintenir des tests via des agents parallèles. Couvre la génération pilotée par couverture, l'exécution parallélisée de suites de tests, l'analyse des lacunes de couverture, le triage des échecs et la refactorisation des tests. Utile pour automatiser des workflows de test complexes où plusieurs agents collaborent.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
TestingAvancé
4002/06/2026
Claude CodeCursorWindsurf
#test-orchestration#test-generation#test-execution#coverage-analysis#e2e-testing

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Ce skill orchestre la génération, l'exécution et la maintenance de tests en parallèle via des agents spécialisés.

Points forts

  • Permet de générer des tests unitaires et d'intégration en parallèle pour gagner du temps.
  • Analyse la couverture de code et identifie les lacunes critiques.
  • Gère le triage et la réparation des tests cassés de manière automatisée.
  • Prend en charge les tests E2E basés sur des parcours utilisateurs.

Limites

  • Nécessite une configuration initiale des dépendances de test et des environnements.
  • Peut générer des tests fragiles si les spécifications ne sont pas claires.
  • L'orchestration parallèle peut consommer beaucoup de ressources.
Quand l'utiliser

Utilisez ce skill lorsque vous devez rapidement augmenter la couverture de test, exécuter des suites de test en parallèle ou diagnostiquer des échecs de test dans un projet complexe.

Quand l'éviter

Évitez de l'utiliser pour des projets très simples où quelques tests manuels suffisent, ou lorsque l'environnement de test est instable.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité90/100

The skill describes testing orchestration patterns without any destructive or exfiltrating actions. Commands like 'npx cc-mirror tasks' are for task management, not arbitrary execution, and the Python snippet uses a hypothetical Task API. No sensitive operations or security bypasses are instructed.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Exemples

Add tests for UserService
Add tests for the UserService
Improve test coverage
Improve test coverage
Fix failing tests
Fix failing tests

Testing Orchestration Patterns

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                                             │
│   Confidence through verification.                          │
│   Generate, execute, analyze — all in parallel.             │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Load when: Test generation, test execution, coverage analysis, test maintenance, E2E testing Common patterns: Coverage-Driven Generation, Parallel Test Suites, Broken Test Triage

Table of Contents

  1. Test Generation
  2. Test Execution
  3. Coverage Analysis
  4. Test Maintenance
  5. E2E Testing

Test Generation

Pattern: Coverage-Driven Generation

User Request: "Add tests for the UserService"

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Understand UserService methods, dependencies

Phase 2: FAN-OUT (Parallel test writing)
├─ Agent A: Unit tests for method group 1
├─ Agent B: Unit tests for method group 2
├─ Agent C: Integration tests for external dependencies
└─ Agent D: Edge cases and error scenarios

Phase 3: PIPELINE
└─ General-purpose agent: Verify tests pass, check coverage

Pattern: Behavior-First

User Request: "Test the checkout flow"

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Map checkout flow steps and branches

Phase 2: PIPELINE (Generate by behavior)
├─ General-purpose agent: Happy path tests
├─ General-purpose agent: Error path tests
└─ General-purpose agent: Edge case tests

Phase 3: BACKGROUND
└─ Background agent: Run tests, report results

Test Execution

Pattern: Parallel Test Suites

User Request: "Run all tests"

Phase 1: FAN-OUT (Parallel suites)
├─ Background agent: Unit tests
├─ Background agent: Integration tests
├─ Background agent: E2E tests
└─ Background agent: Performance tests

Phase 2: REDUCE
└─ General-purpose agent: Aggregate results, identify failures

Pattern: Targeted Execution

User Request: "Test the changes I made"

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Identify changed files and affected tests

Phase 2: FAN-OUT
├─ Background agent: Run directly affected tests
└─ Background agent: Run dependent module tests

Phase 3: PIPELINE
└─ General-purpose agent: Report results, suggest additional tests

Coverage Analysis

Pattern: Gap Identification

User Request: "Improve test coverage"

Phase 1: BACKGROUND
└─ Background agent: Run coverage report

Phase 2: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Identify critical uncovered paths

Phase 3: FAN-OUT (Prioritized gap filling)
├─ Agent A: Tests for critical uncovered module 1
├─ Agent B: Tests for critical uncovered module 2
└─ Agent C: Tests for error handlers

Phase 4: PIPELINE
└─ General-purpose agent: Re-run coverage, verify improvement

Test Maintenance

Pattern: Broken Test Triage

User Request: "Fix failing tests"

Phase 1: BACKGROUND
└─ Background agent: Run tests, capture failures

Phase 2: FAN-OUT (Parallel diagnosis)
├─ Agent A: Diagnose failure group 1
├─ Agent B: Diagnose failure group 2
└─ Agent C: Diagnose failure group 3

Phase 3: FAN-OUT (Parallel fixes)
├─ Agent A: Fix test group 1
├─ Agent B: Fix test group 2
└─ Agent C: Fix test group 3

Phase 4: PIPELINE
└─ Background agent: Verify all tests pass

Pattern: Test Refactoring

User Request: "Clean up test duplication"

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Find duplicate test patterns

Phase 2: PLAN
└─ Plan agent: Design shared fixtures, helpers, patterns

Phase 3: FAN-OUT
├─ Agent A: Extract shared fixtures
├─ Agent B: Refactor test file group 1
└─ Agent C: Refactor test file group 2

Phase 4: PIPELINE
└─ Background agent: Verify tests still pass

E2E Testing

Pattern: User Journey Testing

User Request: "Add E2E tests for user registration"

Phase 1: EXPLORE
└─ Explore agent: Map registration flow, identify test scenarios

Phase 2: PIPELINE (Sequential scenarios)
├─ General-purpose agent: Happy path registration
├─ General-purpose agent: Validation error scenarios
├─ General-purpose agent: Duplicate email handling
└─ General-purpose agent: Email verification flow

Phase 3: BACKGROUND
└─ Background agent: Run E2E suite, capture screenshots

Task Management for Testing

Structure testing work as tasks with clear dependencies:

# Create testing tasks
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Identify testing scope" --description "Analyze what needs testing..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Generate unit tests" --description "Tests for module A..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Generate integration tests" --description "Tests for API endpoints..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Run test suite" --description "Execute all tests, capture results..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Fix failures" --description "Address any failing tests..."
npx cc-mirror tasks create --subject "Verify all pass" --description "Final test run to confirm..."

# Dependencies
npx cc-mirror tasks update 2 --add-blocked-by 1
npx cc-mirror tasks update 3 --add-blocked-by 1
npx cc-mirror tasks update 4 --add-blocked-by 2,3
npx cc-mirror tasks update 5 --add-blocked-by 4
npx cc-mirror tasks update 6 --add-blocked-by 5
# Parallel test generation (sonnet for well-structured work)
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="Task 2: Generate unit tests...",
     model="sonnet", run_in_background=True)
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", prompt="Task 3: Generate integration tests...",
     model="sonnet", run_in_background=True)

Test Execution Best Practices

  1. Always run in background for long test suites
  2. Parallelize independent suites (unit, integration, e2e)
  3. Fail fast - stop on first failure for quick feedback
  4. Capture artifacts - screenshots, logs, coverage reports
  5. Report actionable results - file:line for failures

─── ◈ Testing ───────────────────────────
Skills similaires