Thin Wrapper Skill Pattern
Created: 2026-01-19 Purpose: Quick reference for the thin wrapper skill pattern Audience: /meta agent, skill developers
Overview
Thin wrapper skills are the standard pattern for workflow skills. They:
- Validate inputs
- Prepare delegation context
- Invoke a subagent via Task tool
- Validate and propagate the return
They do NOT:
- Load heavy context (subagent does this)
- Execute business logic (subagent does this)
- Handle complex error recovery (subagent does this)
Frontmatter
---
name: skill-{name}
description: {One-line description}
allowed-tools: Task
context: fork
agent: {agent-name}
---
Key fields:
allowed-tools: Task- Only tool needed for delegationcontext: fork- Do NOT load context eagerly; subagent loads contextagent: {name}- Target subagent to invoke
Execution Pattern
1. Input Validation
Validate task exists and arguments are correct:
task_data=$(jq -r --arg num "$task_number" \
'.active_projects[] | select(.project_number == ($num | tonumber))' \
specs/state.json)
if [ -z "$task_data" ]; then
return error "Task $task_number not found"
fi
2. Context Preparation
Generate session_id and prepare delegation context:
session_id="sess_$(date +%s)_$(od -An -N3 -tx1 /dev/urandom | tr -d ' ')"
{
"session_id": "sess_{timestamp}_{random}",
"delegation_depth": {current_depth + 1},
"delegation_path": [..., "skill-{name}"],
"timeout": {timeout_seconds},
"task_context": {
"task_number": N,
"task_name": "{slug}",
"description": "{description}",
"task_type": "{task_type}"
}
}
3. Invoke Subagent
CRITICAL: Use the Task tool to spawn the subagent.
Tool: Task (NOT Skill)
Parameters:
- subagent_type: "{agent-name}" (from frontmatter)
- prompt: [Include task_context, delegation_context]
- description: "Execute {operation} for task {N}"
DO NOT use Skill({agent-name}) - this will FAIL.
Agents live in .opencode/agents/, not .opencode/skills/.
3b. Self-Execution Fallback
If the skill executor performed work inline (without spawning a subagent via Task tool), it MUST write a .return-meta.json file before proceeding to postflight. This ensures postflight stages can read metadata regardless of execution path.
Why this is needed: The postflight stages (status update, artifact linking, git commit) depend on reading .return-meta.json. When work is done by a subagent, the subagent writes this file. When work is done inline, the skill executor must write it manually using the schema from return-metadata-file.md.
Template (add after Stage 5 / subagent invocation in each skill):
### Stage 5b: Self-Execution Fallback
**CRITICAL**: If you performed the work above WITHOUT using the Task tool (i.e., you read files,
wrote artifacts, or updated metadata directly instead of spawning a subagent), you MUST write a
`.return-meta.json` file now before proceeding to postflight. Use the schema from
`return-metadata-file.md` with the appropriate status value for this operation.
If you DID use the Task tool (Stage 5), skip this stage -- the subagent already wrote the metadata.
4. Return Validation
Validate subagent return:
- Return is valid JSON
- Status is valid enum value
- Summary is non-empty and <100 tokens
- Artifacts array is present
- Session ID matches expected
5. Return Propagation
Return validated result to caller without modification.
Example
---
name: skill-{extension}-research
description: Research {extension} patterns and conventions.
allowed-tools: Task
context: fork
agent: {extension}-research-agent
---
# {Extension} Research Skill
Specialized research for {extension} tasks.
## Trigger Conditions
- Task type is "{extension}"
- Research involves {extension}-specific patterns and tools
## Execution
### 1. Input Validation
Extract task_number. Validate task exists.
### 2. Context Preparation
Generate session_id. Prepare delegation context.
### 3. Invoke Subagent
Use Task tool with subagent_type: {extension}-research-agent
### 4. Return Validation
Validate return matches subagent-return.md schema.
### 5. Return Propagation
Return validated result to caller.
Two Delegation Sub-Patterns
Thin wrapper skills use one of two delegation approaches. The choice depends on whether structured context injection is needed.
Pattern A: Core skill pattern (explicit subagent_type, no context: fork)
Used by: skill-researcher, skill-planner, skill-implementer, skill-reviser, skill-spawn, and other core workflow skills.
---
name: skill-implementer
description: Execute implementation tasks.
allowed-tools: Task, Bash, Edit, Read, Write
---
The skill body explicitly calls the Task tool with subagent_type:
Tool: Task
Parameters:
subagent_type: "general-implementation-agent"
prompt: [full structured context JSON: session_id, delegation_depth, memory_context, etc.]
Why no context: fork: Core skills have multi-stage postflight (status update, artifact linking, git commit). They inject structured context that requires knowing the exact agent. They do NOT use context: fork or agent: frontmatter.
Pattern B: Extension skill pattern (context: fork + agent:, simpler delegation)
Used by: skill-lean-research, skill-present-research, and similar extension skills.
---
name: skill-{ext}-research
description: Research {ext} patterns. Invoke for {ext} research tasks.
allowed-tools: Task
context: fork
agent: {ext}-research-agent
---
The skill body passes simpler instructions to the agent without a full structured context JSON.
Why context: fork: Extension skills are thin wrappers with minimal postflight. The context: fork field prevents context files from being loaded into the skill's session, since the agent loads its own context.
Note: context: fork and CLAUDE_CODE_FORK_SUBAGENT=1 are independent. See @.opencode/context/patterns/fork-patterns.md for the full decision matrix and cache sharing mechanics.
When NOT to Use This Pattern
Use direct execution instead when:
- Skill executes atomic operations (skill-status-sync)
- No subagent needed
- Work is trivial
Direct execution skills use:
allowed-tools: Bash, Edit, Read
Note: Direct-execution skills do not need the Stage 5b self-execution fallback since they do not delegate to subagents and handle their own metadata directly.
Extension Skills (Standard Pattern)
Extension skills follow the standard thin wrapper pattern, delegating to extension-provided agents. For example, an extension may provide skill-{ext}-research and skill-{ext}-implementation that delegate to {ext}-research-agent and {ext}-implementation-agent respectively.
Postflight Boundary Restrictions
After the subagent returns, thin wrapper skills MUST NOT perform implementation work. See @.opencode/context/standards/postflight-tool-restrictions.md for:
- Allowed tools (Read metadata, jq state updates, Edit TODO.md, git commit)
- Prohibited tools (Edit source files, build commands, MCP tools)
- MUST NOT section template to include in skills
Related Documentation
- @.opencode/context/templates/thin-wrapper-skill.md - Full template
- @.opencode/context/patterns/skill-lifecycle.md - Complete skill lifecycle
- @.opencode/context/formats/subagent-return.md - Return format
- @.opencode/context/standards/postflight-tool-restrictions.md - Postflight boundary rules
- @.opencode/docs/guides/creating-skills.md - Step-by-step guide
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.