Audit UI/UX

VérifiéSûr

Auditer l'UI/UX des interfaces en analysant la structure du code, l'accessibilité, la cohérence visuelle, la réactivité et les modèles UX. Produit des résultats structurés avec sévérité et suggestions de correctifs.

Spar Skills Guide Bot
DeveloppementIntermédiaire
2025/07/2026
Claude Code
#ui-review#ux-audit#accessibility#visual-consistency#code-analysis

Recommandé pour

Notre avis

Cette compétence réalise un audit complet de l'UI/UX des codebases frontend, en analysant la structure des composants, l'accessibilité, la réactivité, la cohérence visuelle et les schémas UX.

Points forts

  • Automatise les vérifications au niveau du code pour les problèmes d'interface courants, comme les images sans attribut alt ou les couleurs codées en dur.
  • Prend en charge les revues basées sur des personas pour des retours adaptés.
  • Produit des résultats avec des niveaux de sévérité et des suggestions de correction.

Limites

  • Repose sur une analyse statique du code ; ne peut pas évaluer pleinement les aspects visuels ou interactifs.
  • Limité aux codebases utilisant les frameworks pris en charge (React, Vue, Svelte, etc.).
  • Peut générer des faux positifs ou manquer des décisions de conception dépendantes du contexte.
Quand l'utiliser

À utiliser lorsque vous avez besoin d'une évaluation rapide et systématique de la qualité d'une UI et de son adhésion aux bonnes pratiques.

Quand l'éviter

À éviter pour les revues purement visuelles où le code n'est pas disponible, ou pour les audits d'accessibilité finaux nécessitant des tests manuels.

Analyse de sécurité

Sûr
Score qualité90/100

The skill only executes read-only file analysis commands (grep, find) on user-specified codebases; no destructive actions, data exfiltration, or obfuscation are present. Commands are transparent and limited to diagnostic purposes.

Aucun point d'attention détecté

Exemples

Quick UI Review
/ui-review --target ./src/components --mode quick
Full Standard Audit
/ui-review --target . --mode standard

name: ui-review description: "UI/UX audit skill for reviewing existing interfaces. Invoke when user asks to review UI, audit the frontend, check design quality, or review UX. Analyzes code structure, accessibility, visual consistency, responsiveness, and UX patterns. Outputs structured findings with severity and fix suggestions. Supports optional persona (e.g., 'as a senior designer')." allowed-tools:

  • Bash
  • Read
  • Grep
  • Glob metadata: token-cost-tier: instruction token-cost-estimate: 3000

/ui-review — UI/UX Audit

Usage

/ui-review [--target <path|url>] [--as <persona>] [--mode quick|standard|deep]
  • --target — directory, file, or URL to review (default: current working directory)
  • --as <persona> — load reviewer persona from .claude/personas/<persona>.md
  • quick — layout + accessibility + obvious issues only
  • standard — full audit across all 7 categories (default)
  • deep — standard + component-level analysis + refactor suggestions

Step 0 — Preflight

Identify the UI stack:

# Check package.json for frameworks
grep -l "react\|vue\|svelte\|angular\|next\|nuxt" "${TARGET:-.}/package.json" 2>/dev/null | head -5
# Count UI files
find "${TARGET:-.}" -type f \( -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.vue" -o -name "*.svelte" -o -name "*.html" \) 2>/dev/null | wc -l

Load persona if --as specified:

  • Read .claude/personas/<persona>.md
  • Apply that reviewer's lens to all findings below

Step 1 — Component Structure Analysis

find "${TARGET:-.}" -type f \( -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.vue" \) 2>/dev/null | head -30

Check for:

  • Component files > 200 lines (split concern smell)
  • Missing prop validation / TypeScript types on UI components
  • Inline styles (> 3 occurrences is a smell)
  • God components (single file doing layout + state + data fetch)
grep -rn "style={{" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
grep -rn "useState\|useEffect\|fetch\|axios" "${TARGET:-.}/src" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10

Step 2 — Accessibility Audit (a11y)

grep -rn "<img " "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.vue" --include="*.html" 2>/dev/null | grep -v 'alt=' | head -20
grep -rn "<button\|<a " "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "aria-label\|aria-describedby\|title=" | head -20
grep -rn "onClick.*div\|onClick.*span" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "tabIndex\|role=" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10

Flags:

  • <img> without alt → HIGH (WCAG 1.1.1)
  • Click handlers on div/span → MEDIUM (keyboard inaccessible)
  • Missing aria-label on icon buttons → MEDIUM
  • tabIndex="-1" on focusable elements → check intent

Step 3 — Responsiveness & Layout

grep -rn "px-\|width:\|height:" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.css" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "min-\|max-\|%" | head -20
grep -rn "overflow:\s*hidden\|overflow-hidden\|truncate" "${TARGET:-.}" 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "@media\|sm:\|md:\|lg:\|xl:" "${TARGET:-.}" 2>/dev/null | wc -l

Flags:

  • Fixed pixel widths on containers (not max-width) → MEDIUM
  • No responsive breakpoints in layout components → MEDIUM
  • Content overflow hidden without visible affordance → LOW

Step 4 — Visual Consistency

# Check for color/spacing values hardcoded outside design tokens
grep -rn "#[0-9a-fA-F]\{3,6\}\|rgb(\|rgba(" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.css" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "theme\|token\|var(--\|tailwind" | head -20
# Check for magic spacing numbers
grep -rn "margin:\s*[0-9]\|padding:\s*[0-9]\|gap:\s*[0-9]" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.css" 2>/dev/null | head -20

Flags:

  • Hardcoded color values outside design tokens → MEDIUM (consistency drift risk)
  • Magic spacing numbers outside scale → LOW
  • Multiple font sizes not from a defined scale → MEDIUM

Step 5 — UX Pattern Check

grep -rn "loading\|isLoading\|skeleton\|spinner" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "error\|catch\|onError\|fallback" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "empty\|isEmpty\|noData\|no.*result" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "toast\|notification\|alert\|feedback" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | head -10

Check coverage of UI states:

  • [ ] Loading state
  • [ ] Error state
  • [ ] Empty state
  • [ ] Success feedback

Missing states → MEDIUM (user confusion in edge cases).


Step 6 — Performance Red Flags

# Re-renders: anonymous functions in JSX
grep -rn "onClick={() =>" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
# Missing keys in lists
grep -rn "\.map(" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "key=" | head -20
# Large image without lazy loading
grep -rn "<img " "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.html" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "loading=\|lazy" | head -10

Flags:

  • .map() without key prop → HIGH (React reconciliation issues)
  • Anonymous arrow functions in render at scale (> 20 occurrences) → LOW
  • Images without loading="lazy" in long lists → LOW

Step 7 — Security in UI

grep -rn "dangerouslySetInnerHTML\|innerHTML\|document\.write\|v-html" "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.vue" 2>/dev/null | head -10
grep -rn "localStorage\.\|sessionStorage\." "${TARGET:-.}" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "test\|spec" | head -10
  • dangerouslySetInnerHTML without sanitization → CRITICAL (XSS)
  • Sensitive data (tokens, keys) in localStorage → HIGH

Report Format

UI REVIEW REPORT
================
Target  : <path>
Stack   : <detected framework>
Files   : <N scanned>
Persona : <name if --as used>

## Findings (severity-ordered)

[FINDING] <CATEGORY>/<ID>: <issue name>
  Location : <file>:<line or component>
  Severity : CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
  Issue    : <what's wrong>
  Impact   : <user or dev impact>
  Fix      : <concrete suggestion>

## State Coverage
  Loading  : ✓ / ✗
  Error    : ✓ / ✗
  Empty    : ✓ / ✗
  Success  : ✓ / ✗

## Verdict
PASS | PASS_WITH_WARNINGS | NEEDS_WORK | CRITICAL_ISSUES

## Fix Plan (top 3 priority fixes)
1. [CRITICAL/HIGH finding] — specific change needed
2. ...
3. ...
Skills similaires