Notre avis
Ce guide permet de rédiger la section UI/UX d'un document de conception SDD en suivant des étapes structurées : analyse des exigences, disposition, responsive, interactions, accessibilité, hiérarchie visuelle et états de chargement.
Points forts
- Couverture complète des aspects UX (interactions, accessibilité, responsive).
- Approche méthodique avec tableaux et checklist pour éviter les oublis.
- Intégration des références croisées (@derives) avec les exigences.
Limites
- Nécessite une connaissance préalable du framework SDD et des exigences déjà définies.
- Ne couvre pas l'implémentation (front-end) ni les tests utilisateurs.
- Peut être trop procédural pour des designs très créatifs.
Utilisez ce guide lorsque vous devez rédiger la section UI/UX d'un document de conception SDD, en partant des exigences déjà validées.
Ne l'utilisez pas pour créer un prototype interactif ou pour des décisions de conception en amont sans exigences claires.
Analyse de sécurité
SûrThe skill is a design document guideline for writing a UI/UX section. It does not execute any commands, use any system tools, or involve any destructive/exfiltrating activities. No risky actions are prescribed.
Aucun point d'attention détecté
Exemples
Design the UI/UX section for the user authentication feature. Requirements: REQ-AUTH-01: user must be able to log in with email/password; REQ-AUTH-02: password recovery via email; REQ-AUTH-03: session timeout after 30 minutes.Write the UI/UX design for a dashboard with charts and a sidebar. Desktop breakpoint 1200px, tablet 768-1199px, mobile <768px. Include accessibility and loading states.name: sdd-design-uiux description: | Design layout, responsive behavior, interactions, and accessibility. Use when: sdd-design assigns UI/UX Design section. Triggers: "design layout", "responsive design", "accessibility", "interaction design"
SDD Design UI/UX
Write the UI/UX Design section of a design document.
Scope
| Responsible For | Not Responsible For | |-----------------|---------------------| | Layout structure | Component hierarchy (→ frontend) | | Responsive breakpoints | State management (→ frontend) | | Interaction patterns | Data flow (→ frontend) | | Accessibility (a11y) | Security validation (→ security) | | Visual hierarchy | Bundle size (→ perf) | | Loading states design | Loading implementation (→ frontend) |
Cross-Cutting Roles
Note: Cross-cutting concerns are an extension to sdd-guidelines for specialist coordination. See sdd-design for full mapping.
UI/UX is:
- Primary owner: Accessibility, Loading states
- Reviewer for: Error handling (owned by frontend)
Instructions
Step 1: Read Context
- Design skeleton (from sdd-design)
- All REQs in your section's
@derives - Foundation anchors (especially
SCOPE-*,CONSTRAINT-*, audience)
Step 2: Analyze Requirements
For each assigned REQ, extract UI/UX implications:
| REQ | User Goal | UX Elements Needed | |-----|-----------|-------------------| | | | |
Tip: Focus on user goals and experience, not implementation.
Step 3: Design Layout Structure
Define spatial organization:
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ {Region} │
├─────────────┬───────────────────┤
│ {Region} │ {Region} │
│ │ │
└─────────────┴───────────────────┘
Principles:
- Content hierarchy reflects user priorities
- Related elements grouped
- Primary actions prominent
Document layout decisions with @derives linking to REQ.
Step 4: Define Responsive Strategy
Based on REQ viewport requirements:
| Breakpoint | Width | Layout Changes | Rationale | |------------|-------|----------------|-----------| | Desktop | ≥{X}px | | REQ says "..." | | Tablet | {X}-{Y}px | | REQ says "..." | | Mobile | <{X}px | | REQ says "..." |
Decision points:
- Adaptive (different layouts) vs Responsive (fluid)?
- What collapses/hides at each breakpoint?
- Touch targets for mobile?
Step 5: Design Interaction Patterns
For each user action in REQs:
| Action | Trigger | Feedback | Duration | @derives | |--------|---------|----------|----------|----------| | | | | | REQ-XXX |
Feedback types:
- Immediate: button states, hover
- Progress: loading, spinners
- Completion: success/error states
Step 6: Design Accessibility
Map REQ features to a11y requirements:
| Feature | Keyboard | Screen Reader | Visual | |---------|----------|---------------|--------| | {from REQ} | Tab order, shortcuts | ARIA labels, announcements | Focus, contrast |
WCAG checklist:
- [ ] All interactive elements keyboard accessible
- [ ] Focus visible and logical
- [ ] Color not sole indicator
- [ ] Text contrast ≥4.5:1
Step 7: Define Visual Hierarchy
Prioritize content per REQs:
- Primary: {what REQ emphasizes most}
- Secondary: {supporting content}
- Tertiary: {optional/advanced}
If REQ doesn't specify priority:
- User's primary task → Primary
- Supporting info → Secondary
- Edge cases/advanced features → Tertiary
Document with @derives linking to REQ.
Step 8: Design Loading States
For async operations in REQs:
| Operation | Skeleton/Spinner | Placement | @derives | |-----------|------------------|-----------|----------| | | | | REQ-XXX |
Step 9: Write Section
## UI/UX Design
@derives: {REQ-IDs}
### Layout Structure
### Responsive Breakpoints
### Interaction Patterns
### Accessibility
### Visual Hierarchy
### Loading States
**Status:** draft
Step 10: Add Decisions
For non-obvious choices:
| ID | Decision | Rationale | Owner |
|----|----------|-----------|-------|
| DEC-00x | {what} | {why — connect to REQ} | uiux |
Step 11: Handoff
Per sdd-guidelines §4.3 and §10.6.
1. Update Section Status
**Status:** verified
2. Update State File
# .sdd/state.yaml
documents:
design:
sections:
uiux: verified
3. Create Handoff Record
# .sdd/handoffs/{timestamp}-uiux.yaml
from: sdd-design-uiux
to: sdd-design
timestamp: {ISO-8601}
completed:
- design.uiux: verified
in_progress: []
blocked: []
gaps: []
next_steps:
- sdd-design-frontend: Review accessibility — verify components support a11y props
- sdd-design-perf: Review loading states for performance impact
4. Cross-Cutting Status
| Concern | Primary | Reviewer | Status |
|---------|---------|----------|--------|
| Accessibility | uiux | frontend | ready-for-review |
| Loading states | uiux | perf | ready-for-review |
@derives Judgment
A layout/interaction @derives from a REQ when:
| Criterion | Example | |-----------|---------| | Directly addresses REQ's UX need | Responsive layout → REQ's "works on mobile" | | Enables REQ's user action | Interaction pattern → REQ's "user can toggle" | | Satisfies REQ's constraint | Breakpoints → REQ's viewport requirements |
NOT @derives:
- Generic UX best practices not tied to REQ
- Aesthetic choices without REQ basis
Verification
- [ ] All assigned REQs have @derives coverage
- [ ] Layout supports all REQ features
- [ ] Breakpoints match REQ viewport requirements
- [ ] Interactions defined for all user actions in REQs
- [ ] Accessibility covers all interactive elements
- [ ] Loading states for all async operations
- [ ] Decisions logged with rationale
- [ ] Cross-cutting items flagged for reviewers
References
| File | Content | |------|---------| | reference/responsive-strategy.md | REQ-based responsive decisions | | reference/a11y-checklist.md | Accessibility verification for SDD |
Examples
| File | Content | |------|---------| | examples/react-sample.md | Complete example for react-sample package |
Expert Next.js App Router
Developpement
Un skill qui transforme Claude en expert Next.js App Router.
Générateur de README
Developpement
Crée des README.md professionnels et complets pour vos projets.
Rédacteur de Documentation API
Developpement
Génère de la documentation API complète au format OpenAPI/Swagger.